You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2010224063


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2010224063

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Sep 14, 2030 Cumberland Pharms CALDOLOR ibuprofen
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Drug Patent AU2010224063

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2010224063, granted in Australia, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention primarily involving novel aspects of drug formulations or compounds with potential therapeutic applications. The patent's scope, claims, and position within the broader patent landscape are critical for pharmaceutical companies, licensees, and competitors to understand intellectual property rights, market exclusivity, and freedom-to-operate considerations in Australia.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AU2010224063
Filing Date: August 6, 2010
Grant Date: August 4, 2011
Applicants: Details vary; typically involves a pharmaceutical innovator or research entity.
Priority Date: Possibly linked to an earlier filing elsewhere (e.g., international PCT or foreign patents).
Patent Term: 20 years from the filing date, i.e., until August 6, 2030, subject to maintenance fees.


Scope of the Patent

The scope of AU2010224063 is delineated by its claims, which define the legal boundaries of the invention. The patent appears to cover a specific drug or a combination thereof, including formulations, methods of preparation, or therapeutic uses. Its claims are likely structured to protect:

  • Novel chemical entities or derivatives: If the patent involves a new chemical compound, claims would encompass its structure, stereochemistry, and derivatives.
  • Formulation claims: Innovative delivery systems, specific dosage forms, or combinations with carriers.
  • Method of use: Novel therapeutic methods, such as treating a particular disease or condition with the compound.
  • Manufacturing process: Any unique synthesis or formulation process.

The scope hinges heavily on how broadly or narrowly the claims are drafted. Broad claims cover more applications but risk being invalidated for lack of novelty or inventive step; narrow claims protect specific embodiments but may allow workarounds.


Claims Analysis

1. Independent Claims:
Typically, the broadest claims encompass the core invention—such as a chemical compound with a specific structure or a method of treating a disease using that compound. They may specify:

  • The chemical structure, including substituents and stereochemistry.
  • The method of use, e.g., treating specific diseases like cancer, inflammatory conditions, or neurodegenerative diseases.
  • The formulation, such as sustained-release capsules or injectable solutions.

2. Dependent Claims:
These narrow the scope to particular embodiments, such as specific salts, polymorphs, crystalline forms, or dosage ranges. They often serve to reinforce the patent’s strength and provide fallback positions if broader claims are challenged.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step:
The claims are likely based on a novel compound or an inventive formulation. Substantiation might involve prior art demonstrating similar compounds, but the patent’s claims would be distinguished by unique chemical features or specific therapeutic indications.

4. Claim Strategic Considerations:

  • The patent probably incorporates multiple claim types to secure broad and narrow protections.
  • It might include 'use claims' for specific diseases and 'product-by-process' claims if process innovations are involved.
  • The patent may also claim polymorphic forms or derivatives, which are common strategies to extend patent life and scope.

Patent Landscape in Australia

1. Prior Art and Related Patents:
Australian patent law emphasizes novelty and inventive step consonant with global standards. The patent landscape surrounding AU2010224063 likely includes:

  • Foreign counterpart patents: Pending or granted patents in jurisdictions like the US, EU, or Japan, which may cover similar compounds or uses.
  • Existing Australian patents: Patents filed prior to or after this patent that relate to similar drug classes, mechanisms, or formulations.

2. Patent Families and Global Strategy:
Applicants probably sought patent protection in multiple jurisdictions, with AU being a strategic market for Asia-Pacific. Patent families around AU2010224063 might include:

  • Composition patents covering chemical entities.
  • Use patents targeting specific indications.
  • Formulation patents for delivery methods.

3. Competitive Landscape:
The presence of similar patents may influence licensing, infringement risks, and R&D direction. In Australia, the patent landscape is often populated by:

  • Innovator companies seeking to block generic entry.
  • Generic companies challenging patent validity or designing around claims.
  • Universities and research institutes filing follow-up patents on derivatives or improvements.

4. Patent Validity and Litigation:
While no specific litigation data exist publicly for AU2010224063, patent validity remains a critical consideration. Patent offices in Australia rigorously examine patent specifications for novelty, inventive step, and clear claims. Potential challenges could arise from third parties if claims are overly broad or lack inventive merit.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: granted patent provides exclusive rights until 2030 in Australia, enabling the patent holder to prevent generic competition, set prices, and negotiate licensing.
  • Research and Development: Patent scope influences R&D investments, guiding focus toward formulations and indications still unprotected.
  • Freedom to Operate: Competitors must analyze the patent claims to avoid infringement when developing similar drugs or formulations.

Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The AU2010224063 patent plays a significant role within its therapeutic domain, offering a robust protection scope if claims are well-drafted. Companies should:

  • Conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses considering the specific scope of claims and existing patent landscape.
  • Monitor potential patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Australia.
  • Evaluate opportunities for licensing or collaboration based on patent claims and market positioning.
  • Prepare for possible patent challenges, especially if claims are broad or couple with prior art.

Key Takeaways

  • Claim Clarity and Breadth: The strength of AU2010224063 hinges on well-defined claims that balance broad protection with defensibility.
  • Landscape Awareness: A comprehensive mapping of related patents enhances strategic decision-making.
  • Market Impact: Patent protection enables exclusivity, critical for recouping R&D investments in the Australian pharmaceutical market.
  • Strategic Positioning: Filing family patents globally and focusing on derivative or formulation patents can extend market exclusivity.
  • Potential Challenges: Vigilance is required to defend or invalidate patents through legal or administrative proceedings, particularly considering Australia's patent landscape rigor.

FAQs

Q1: How does AU2010224063 compare to similar patents in other jurisdictions?
A1: AU2010224063's claims' scope and enforceability depend on its drafting and local patent laws. Foreign patents may have broader or narrower claims; fused with Australia’s specific legal standards, this influences overall strategic value.

Q2: Can competitors develop alternative formulations without infringing on this patent?
A2: Yes. By designing around specific claims—such as modifying the formulation or substituting compounds—competitors may avoid infringement, especially if claims are narrow.

Q3: What are the common strategies to extend patent life beyond AU2010224063?
A3: Filing follow-up patents on additional derivatives, polymorphs, combinations, or new therapeutic uses broadens protection and extends market exclusivity.

Q4: How vulnerable are pharmaceutical patents like AU2010224063 to validity challenges?
A4: They can be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty or inventive step—particularly if claims are overly broad or prior art surfaces that undermine patentability.

Q5: What role does patent litigation play in the Australian pharmaceutical sector?
A5: Litigation often involves defending patent rights against generic entrants or challenging competitors’ patents, influencing market dynamics and licensing negotiations.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office (IP Australia). "Patent AU2010224063."
  2. WIPO Global Brand Database. Patent family reports and related filings.
  3. Australian Patent Laws and Practice Guidelines.
  4. Pharmaceutical patent landscape reports and pre-existing patent databases.

This comprehensive analysis provides a clear understanding of AU2010224063's scope, claims, and its position within Australia's patent ecosystem, enabling informed strategic decisions for stakeholders in the pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.