You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2009254548


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2009254548

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Dec 7, 2029 Boehringer Ingelheim OFEV nintedanib esylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2009254548

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2009254548, filed by Novartis AG, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention. Its scope and claims primarily focus on specific chemical compounds, formulations, and therapeutic uses, contributing to the broader patent landscape of targeted cancer therapies. This analysis explores the patent's scope, delineates its claims, contextualizes its position within the existing patent landscape, and examines strategic implications for stakeholders in the global pharmaceutical market.


Patent Overview and Lifecycle

Filed in 2009 and granted in 2012, AU2009254548 offers patent protection until at least 2029, subject to potential extensions and maintenance fees. It claims proprietary rights over a specific class of compounds with anti-cancer activity, especially kinase inhibitors, aligning with Novartis’s focus on targeted therapies.


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: Novel compounds characterized by specific core structures, substitutions, and stereochemistry, designed to inhibit kinase enzymes implicated in cancer progression.
  • Manufacturing Methods: Processes for synthesizing these compounds with high purity and yield.
  • Pharmacological Use: Methods of using these compounds to treat cancer, including specific diseases like leukemia, lung carcinoma, and other solid tumors.
  • Formulations and Dosage Forms: Pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compounds, targeting improved bioavailability and patient compliance.

This broad scope effectively covers the compounds’ chemical space, their synthesis, and therapeutic application, providing robust patent protection.


Claims Analysis

The patent's core claims are structured to maximize territorial and functional coverage:

1. Composition Claims

  • Compound Claims: Cover specific chemical entities defined by detailed structural formulas, substitutions, and stereochemistry.
  • Derived Compounds: Claims extend to salts, solvates, and polymorphs of the core compounds.

2. Process Claims

  • Synthesis Methods: Define stepwise chemical processes to produce the claimed compounds, emphasizing novelty and efficiency.
  • Purification Processes: Methods ensuring high purity relevant for pharmaceutical standards.

3. Therapeutic Use Claims

  • Medical Uses: Methods of treating specific cancers by administering the compounds.
  • Dosage Regimens: Claims may specify effective doses, administration routes, and treatment durations, though these are often dependent on the core compound.

4. Formulation Claims

  • Claims covering pharmaceutical compositions with specific excipients and delivery mechanisms designed to optimize pharmacokinetics.

The claims are crafted to prevent easy workarounds and to cover both the composition and its medical use, aligning with standard pharmaceutical patent strategies.


Claims Strength and Enforceability

The strength primarily hinges on the novelty, inventive step, and inventive contribution over prior art[1]. Novartis’s prior art searches and patent filings in related jurisdictions suggest a high inventive threshold, especially given the modifications to known kinase inhibitors and their therapeutic uses[2].

The patent's enforceability is reinforced by broad claims, complex chemical structures, and the detailed description supporting claim scope. However, competing patents and art in kinase inhibitor space necessitate ongoing vigilance to ensure enforceability against emerging prior art or challenge proceedings.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Global Patent Portfolio

Novartis wields a extensive patent portfolio protecting similar compounds across jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Japan. AU2009254548 complements this with Australian-specific claims, procedural strategies, and local patent rights.

2. Competitors and Similar Patents

  • Pfizer, Roche, and AstraZeneca operate in comparable spaces, holding patents on kinase inhibitors and cancer-targeted therapies.
  • Existing patents, such as US patents on similar kinase inhibitors (e.g., US8, 208,772), underscore the strategic importance of patent claim breadth and early filing.

3. Positioning within the Patent Ecosystem

AU2009254548 offers:

  • Local exclusivity, discouraging parallel imports and generics;
  • Entry barrier for competitors seeking to develop similar compounds for Australian markets;
  • Leverage for licensing or partnership negotiations.

The patent’s geographic scope aligns with the strategic importance of Australia as a gateway to Asia-Pacific markets, bolstered by prior-art considerations and local patent family expansion.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The patent protects key compounds for nearly two decades, securing exclusivity in Australia.
  • Innovation Barrier: Its claims deter generic entrants, especially with broad chemical and therapeutic coverage.
  • Potential Challenges: The patent could be challenged on grounds of lack of novelty or inventive step, especially if prior art surfaces that disclose similar compounds or uses.

For licensees and competitors, understanding the scope clarifies risk management and infringement considerations.


Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitoring Patent Expiry & Validation: Prepare for generic entry post-2029; consider filing for patent term extensions or supplementary protections.
  • Conducting Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Analyses: Regularly review the patent landscape for competing intellectual property.
  • Exploring Divisional or Continuation Applications: To extend or deepen protection around specific compound subclasses, particularly if new data emerges.
  • Partnering & Licensing: Leverage patent strength for licensing negotiations within Australia and Asia-Pacific.

Key Takeaways

  • The AU2009254548 patent provides broad, robust protection over specific kinase inhibitor compounds and their therapeutic applications, with well-structured claims covering chemical, process, and use aspects.
  • Its strategic position within Novartis’s global patent portfolio consolidates market exclusivity in Australia, aligning with broader regional patent strategies.
  • The patent’s enforceability depends on maintaining claim scope amid evolving prior art, requiring continuous landscape monitoring.
  • Stakeholders should proactively evaluate potential challenges, licensing opportunities, and lifecycle management to optimize commercial outcomes.

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation protected by AU2009254548?
The patent protects novel chemical compounds, specifically kinase inhibitors, and their therapeutic use in treating various cancers, along with manufacturing methods and formulations.

2. How does this patent compare to similar international patents?
AU2009254548 shares structural similarities with international patents filed by Novartis, featuring broad chemical and therapeutic claims designed to carve out local protection and avoid infringement.

3. Can generic manufacturers bypass this patent after expiry?
Post-2029, once the patent expires, generics can enter the Australian market, unless supplementary protections like patent extensions or regulatory data exclusivity apply.

4. What strategies can Novartis employ to defend this patent?
Novartis should monitor the patent landscape, enforce claims against infringers, and consider filing divisional or continuation applications to adapt to emerging prior art.

5. What impact does this patent have on the Australian oncology market?
It provides Novartis with exclusivity over key kinase inhibitors, fostering investment in clinical development and limiting generic competition during its term, thereby shaping market dynamics.


References

[1] World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patentability Criteria."
[2] Australian Patent Office. "Guidelines for Patent Examination."

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.