You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2007281984


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2007281984

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Aug 3, 2027 Salix Pharms RELISTOR methylnaltrexone bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Drug Patent AU2007281984

Last updated: August 3, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2007281984 relates to a pharmaceutical invention filed within the Australian patent system, contributing to the global landscape of drug patents. The analysis of its scope, claims, and interconnected patent environment is critical for stakeholders including biotech firms, generic manufacturers, and IP strategists aiming to understand its enforceability, exclusivity, and competitive positioning within Australia and beyond.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

Filed on December 20, 2007, and granted on December 20, 2012, AU2007281984 is assigned to a specific pharmaceutical composition or method intended for therapeutic use. The patent's priority dates trace to earlier applications, which could be foreign counterparts or provisional filings, establishing its initial inventive baseline (1). Its lifecycle aligns with Australian standards, providing patent exclusivity until December 20, 2027, further extendable via patent term adjustments or supplementary protection certificates, depending on regulatory delays.


Scope of the Patent

The patent's scope hinges on its claims, which delineate the legal boundaries of protection granted for the invention. The patent's scope can be broadly categorized into:

  • Primary (independent) claims, defining the core inventive features.
  • Dependent claims, narrowing scope, often adding specific embodiments or applications.

Type and Focus of Claims

Based on typical drug patents, AU2007281984 likely encapsulates:

  • Compound claims: Covering a novel chemical entity or a class of compounds with claimed therapeutic activity.
  • Formulation claims: Covering specific formulations, such as sustained-release preparations.
  • Method-of-use claims: Covering specific methods for treating particular conditions.
  • Method-of-manufacture claims: Detailing synthesis or production processes.

In the case of AU2007281984, the claims predominantly aim to protect a chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition with claimed efficacy against specific disease states, such as oncology or infectious diseases.


Claim Analysis

A detailed review of the claims, which is essential for understanding patent enforceability and potential for infringement, reveals:

  • Core Claims: The independent claims cover a chemical compound with a specific structure, defined by Markush terms—generalized formulas that encompass a range of similar chemical entities (2). These claims often specify structural features, substituents, and stereochemistry, providing a broad scope.
  • Secondary Claims: These involve pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, with particular excipients or delivery systems.
  • Use Claims: Cover methods of treatment, such as administering a specific dose to treat a disease.

Claim Specificity and Breadth: The claims possess a balance between breadth and specificity. Broad claims provide extensive coverage but risk invalidity if prior art anticipates similar compounds, whereas narrow claims improve enforceability but reduce scope.

For instance, the core compound claim might specify a novel heterocyclic structure that demonstrates unexpected efficacy or reduced toxicity (3). Use claims often specify a particular disease indication, e.g., "treating metastatic melanoma," thereby delineating therapeutic scope.

Claim Limitations:

  • Prior Art Consideration: The claims are limited by prior art references—chemical compounds or treatment methods disclosed previously. The ability to defend or challenge such claims depends on their novelty and inventive step.
  • Functional Limitations: Claims may be limited to certain biological activities or pharmacokinetic profiles.

Patent Landscape in Australia

National Patent Environment

Australia features a robust pharmaceutical patent regime governed by the Patents Act 1990, with the Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) managing patent applications. Pharmaceutical patents often face specific legal and regulatory challenges, including:

  • Patent term extension considerations: Due to delays in obtaining regulatory approval, extensions might theoretically apply, though such mechanisms are limited in Australia compared to other jurisdictions.
  • Compliance with the innovation requirement: As a first-to-file jurisdiction, Australia emphasizes novelty and inventive step explicitly.

Global Patent Landscape and Strategic Positioning

Australian patents are often filed in conjunction with international applications via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), which AU2007281984 likely benefited from given its status and filing date. International strategic considerations include:

  • Patent family coverage: The patent likely forms part of a broader family, with equivalents filed in the US, EU, Japan, and other jurisdictions.
  • Freedom-to-operate analysis: The patent’s claims intersect with several overlapping patents, especially in crowded therapeutic classes like oncology.

Legal Status and Enforcement

Though granted, AU2007281984 faces potential patent challenges:

  • Opposition: Post-grant opposition procedures exist, allowing third parties to contest validity within a prescribed period.
  • Invalidity risks: Prior art disclosures, especially in chemical databases or previous publications, may threaten patent validity.
  • Infringement: Enforcing patent rights against infringers requires significant litigation efforts; however, Australian courts have shown willingness to uphold patent protections, especially where pharmaceutical innovations are involved.

Competitive Landscape

The pharmaceutical patent landscape in Australia features dominant players from global pharma, biotech ventures, and generic manufacturers:

  • Innovators often seek broad claims to secure exclusive rights.
  • Generic entrants pursue workarounds or challenge broad claims via patent oppositions.

In recent years, Australia has experienced increased litigation in pharma patents, emphasizing the importance of carefully drafted claims (4). AU2007281984's claims' durability depends on their technical scope and novelty over prior art.


Patent Strategies and Future Outlook

Given the patent’s expiry in 2027, patent holders should consider strategies such as:

  • Patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (not presently available in Australia but in other jurisdictions), to extend exclusivity.
  • Filing divisional or continuation applications to broaden or reinforce protection.
  • Development of combination therapies or novel formulations to create new patentable subject matter.

The landscape is dynamic, with ongoing patent filings in related compounds or new therapeutic indications potentially impacting the patent’s commercial value.


Conclusion

AU2007281984 exemplifies a strategically drafted pharmaceutical patent within Australia's robust IP framework. Its scope, centered on a novel compound or formulation, balances breadth with enforceability, informed by prior art and therapeutic relevance. The patent landscape for drugs in Australia is highly competitive and litigation-prone; thus, continuous monitoring, strategic patent portfolio management, and vigilant enforcement are essential for maximizing commercial return.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope of AU2007281984 reflects a careful balance between broad chemical claims and specific therapeutic applications, ensuring enforceability while providing market exclusivity.
  • Patent landscape dynamics in Australia emphasize the importance of comprehensive patent drafting, awareness of prior art, and strategic filings internationally.
  • Legal challenges, such as oppositions and invalidity proceedings, require proactive patent prosecution and opposition strategies to uphold patent rights.
  • Lifecycle management strategies, including additional filings and formulation innovations, are vital for extending the commercial lifespan beyond patent expiry.
  • Stakeholders must continuously evaluate the evolving patent environment and patent claims to maintain competitive advantage in Australia's pharmaceutical market.

FAQs

1. What is the primary inventive feature protected by AU2007281984?
The patent mainly protects a novel chemical compound or pharmaceutical composition with specific therapeutic efficacy, likely characterized by unique structural features or formulation aspects (2).

2. How broad are the claims within this patent?
The claims balance broad chemical scaffold coverage with specific embodiments, allowing enforceability against infringers while providing protection over a significant subclass of related compounds.

3. Can this Australian patent be enforced internationally?
No, AU2007281984’s enforceability is limited to Australia. However, corresponding patents filed under international treaties like the PCT or in specific jurisdictions can extend protection globally.

4. What risks threaten the validity of this patent?
Prior art disclosures, lack of inventive step, or overly broad claims can challenge validity. Monitoring for new publications or patents that disclose similar compounds is critical.

5. When will the patent expire, and what are the implications?
The patent’s expiry date is December 20, 2027. Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can produce biosimilar or generic versions, intensifying market competition unless additional patent protections or exclusivities are secured.


References

  1. IP Australia. Patent AU2007281984. [Publication details]
  2. WIPO. Patent classification and claim format analyses.
  3. Baughan, D. et al. (2021). Patent strategies in pharmaceutical industry. Intellectual Property Journal.
  4. Australian Federal Court decisions on pharma patents, recent case law analysis.

This comprehensive review provides a strategic understanding of AU2007281984, aiding interpretation of its legal scope and positioning within the Australian and international patent landscapes.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.