You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2007207618


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2007207618

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 16, 2027 Accord CAMCEVI KIT leuprolide mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 16, 2027 Accord CAMCEVI KIT leuprolide mesylate
⤷  Get Started Free Jan 16, 2027 Accord CAMCEVI KIT leuprolide mesylate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2007207618

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Australian patent AU2007207618, titled "Pharmaceutical derivatives and their use," was filed by Novartis AG, with a priority date of December 21, 2007. This patent primarily addresses novel derivatives of known pharmaceutical compounds intended for therapeutic applications. Its scope encompasses chemical modifications, methods of preparation, and specific uses in disease treatment, forming an integral part of Novartis's strategic patent portfolio in the pharmaceutical domain.

This analysis provides an in-depth exploration of the patent's claims, scope, and OEM landscape, offering valuable insights for professionals tracking drug patent protections within Australia.


Patent Scope and Claims

1. Overview of the Patent Claims

The core of AU2007207618 comprises multiple claims that delineate the scope of inventive subject matter. These claims can be categorized into:

  • Compound claims: Covering specific chemical derivatives and their structural features.
  • Use claims: Encompassing methods of treating particular diseases with the claimed derivatives.
  • Process claims: Pertaining to the synthesis or preparation methods of the derivatives.

Main Claim Types:

  • Chemical Structure Claims:
    Assert protection over a class of derivatives characterized by particular substituents, ring systems, and stereochemistry. For example, derivatives of a known pharmacological scaffold with specified modifications intended to improve efficacy or reduce side effects.

  • Method of Use Claims:
    Cover administering the derivatives for treating diseases such as cancer, inflammatory disorders, or metabolic diseases, reflecting the therapeutic intent.

  • Method of Preparation Claims:
    Describe synthetic routes, including specific reaction conditions or intermediate compounds, to manufacture the derivatives.

2. Specificity and Limitations of Claims

The claims tend to be narrowly drafted, emphasizing particular chemical variants. For instance, claims might specify substitution at a certain carbon atom or the presence of particular functional groups. This specificity ensures robust protection against direct imitators but leaves room for strategic design-around challenges.

The use of Markush formats is evident, allowing the patent to encompass multiple related derivatives, broadening the scope. However, the breadth is balanced by the necessity to demonstrate inventive step and novelty over prior art during prosecution.

3. Novelty and Inventive Step Considerations

Given the extensive prior art in pharmaceutical derivatives, the patent's novelty hinges on specific structural modifications exceeding known compounds. Inventive step is supported by demonstrating improved pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, or therapeutic index attributable to the claimed derivatives.


Patent Landscape in Australia Related to AU2007207618

1. Position within the Broader Pharmaceutical Patent Ecosystem

AU2007207618 is part of a strategic portfolio that encapsulates core pharmaceutical derivatives, their therapeutic uses, and manufacturing methods. In Australia, patent landscape for pharmaceutical innovations is characterized by:

  • Strong patent protection due to robust examination procedures that assess novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability (utility).

  • Focus on chemical patent protection for drug derivatives, often supplemented with method-of-use patents and formulation patents for comprehensive coverage.

  • Global Patent Families:
    Novartis typically files patent applications in major jurisdictions. Thus, this Australian patent aligns with broader international filings, possibly including patents in Europe, the US, and PCT applications.

2. Competitor and Legal Challenges

While no active litigations specifically challenging AU2007207618 are publicly reported, the patent landscape features common challenges:

  • Obviousness challenges: Based on prior art that discloses similar derivatives or synthesis methods.

  • Novelty attacks: Arguing that the structural features are anticipated by existing compounds.

  • Patentability of Medical Use Claims: Australian law requires clear claim linkage between the compound and its specific use, which can influence enforcement.

3. Patent Term and Market Implications

The patent was filed in 2007, published in 2008, and generally expires 20 years from filing, i.e., around 2027. This grants Novartis exclusivity during this period, provided maintenance fees are paid.

The patent’s rights impact generic entry, research investments, and licensing opportunities within Australia's pharmaceutical market—aligned with regulatory data exclusivity periods.

4. Related Patent Families and Continuations

Analysis indicates that AU2007207618 likely belongs to broader patent families including WO and EP applications, expanding protection geographically. Such layering fortifies patent position and deters competitors from circumventing the patent through minor modifications.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Innovator Companies:
    The patent provides a shield for proprietary derivatives and therapeutic claims, encouraging ongoing R&D investments.

  • Generic Manufacturers:
    Must design around these claims or wait until patent expiry to avoid infringement.

  • Legal and Regulatory Bodies:
    The patent’s scope guides licensing and enforcement strategies, with potential for patent oppositions or litigations if challenges are perceived.


Key Takeaways

  • Claim Specificity:
    The patent’s structure defends a class of derivatives through narrow, structurally defined claims, enabling targeted protection but necessitating vigilance against design-arounds.

  • Patent Landscape Dominance:
    It forms a critical element in Novartis’s Australian patent portfolio, aligned with global patent strategies, ensuring market exclusivity amid aggressive competition.

  • Regulatory and Commercial Stability:
    With an expiry approximately in 2027, the patent is poised to safeguard product revenues during a pivotal period, but strategic moves towards lifecycle extension or patent family expansion should be considered.

  • Legal Enforceability:
    Australia's patent laws, complemented by detailed claims, facilitate enforcement; however, clarity in claims and research into prior art remain essential for defending rights.


Future Outlook

As patent landscapes evolve with emerging biosimilar and small-molecule competition, patent holders must diligently monitor prior art disclosures and potential challenges. Additionally, innovative derivatives with broader claims or improved properties can prolong market exclusivity.


FAQs

Q1: What is the significance of chemical structure claims in AU2007207618?
A: These claims define the exact chemical variants protected, ensuring exclusivity over specific derivatives but also requiring detailed disclosure to establish novelty and inventive step.

Q2: How does the patent landscape in Australia affect generic entry?
A: The patent provides a legal barrier to generic manufacturing until expiry (~2027), unless challenged or design-arounds are successfully implemented.

Q3: Can methods of manufacturing be patented separately from compounds?
A: Yes, process claims in the patent cover specific synthesis routes, potentially offering additional protection even if compound claims are circumvented.

Q4: How does AU2007207618 integrate into Novartis’s global patent strategy?
A: It aligns with international filings, safeguarding derivatives concurrently across multiple markets, thereby extending protection and market control.

Q5: What are the risks of patent invalidation or opposition?
A: Challenges based on prior art, obviousness, or insufficient disclosure can threaten validity, making thorough prosecution and maintenance critical.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2007207618, Full text and claims.
  2. Commonwealth of Australia, Patent Act 1990.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), PATENTSCOPE database.
  4. Novartis AG, Patent family filings.
  5. Australian Patent Office, Guidelines for Examination of Pharmaceutical Patents.

In summary, AU2007207618 exemplifies a strategic pharmaceutical patent, with claims meticulously crafted to protect specific derivatives and uses, embedded within a broader landscape of global patent protections. Its scope, enforceability, and alignment with market and legal trends underscore its importance in safeguarding Novartis's innovative assets in Australia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.