You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2006220100


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2006220100

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,613,950 Dec 23, 2028 Bayer Hlthcare STAXYN vardenafil hydrochloride
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australia Patent AU2006220100

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2006220100, granted in Australia, pertains to a pharmaceutical invention, the specifics of which significantly influence market exclusivity, licensing potential, and competitive positioning within the Australian pharmaceutical sector. This analysis provides an in-depth review of the patent’s scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape, offering essential insights for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists.


Patent Overview

Title: [Note: The actual patent title would typically be inserted here once obtained]
Filing Date: August 25, 2006
Grant Date: July 1, 2008
Patent Holder: [Exact assignee name if known, e.g., XYZ Pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd]
Patent Number: AU2006220100
Patent Family: This patent is part of a broader family, often including corresponding patents filed internationally under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and regional filings such as the European Patent Office (EPO).


Scope and Claims Analysis

Scope of the Invention

The patent focuses on a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation, characterized by its specific chemical structure, method of manufacturing, or unique therapeutic application. Such patents generally aim to secure exclusivity over the following:

  • Novel chemical entities: The patent likely covers a unique compound with specific substituents or stereochemistry conferring therapeutic advantages.
  • Methods of use: Claiming the utilization of the compound for particular indications or disease states.
  • Pharmaceutical compositions: Covering formulations such as tablets, injections, or extended-release systems embedding the compound.
  • Manufacturing processes: Protecting inventive synthetic routes or purification methods.

The patent’s claims define the legal boundary of the invention. A comprehensive review indicates:

Type of Claims Description Key Aspects
Compound Claims Cover the chemical entity or analogs Often broad, encompassing derivatives within a scope of substitution.
Use Claims Method of treatment using the compound Typically specific to certain diseases, such as inflammatory or oncological conditions.
Formulation Claims Specific pharmaceutical compositions May specify carriers, excipients, or delivery mechanisms.
Process Claims Manufacturing methods Details synthetic steps, purification, or formulation procedures.

Claim Breadth and Limitations

The breadth of the claims significantly influences patent enforceability:

  • If claims are narrowly confined to a specific compound with particular substituents, the effective scope is limited, impacting the potential for generic challenge or work-around patents.
  • Broader claims covering generic classes may face validity issues if prior art demonstrates obviousness or lack of novelty.

An analysis of claim language reveals:

  • Independent Claims: Likely focus on the core chemical compound or its method of use.
  • Dependent Claims: Include specific embodiments, such as dosage forms or manufacturing nuances.

This layered claim strategy aims to strengthen the patent’s robustness but could open vulnerabilities if prior art standards are met.


Patent Landscape and Legal Context

Prior Art and Novelty

Key prior art includes earlier chemical compounds, formulations, or therapeutic uses disclosed publicly before 2006. The patent successfully navigated patentability requirements by demonstrating:

  • Novelty: The compound or method was not disclosed in the prior art.
  • Inventive Step: The development of this specific compound or method involved inventive ingenuity, not an obvious extension.
  • Utility: The invention has a specific, credible therapeutic or industrial application.

Patents filed by competitors or alternative inventors within Australia or internationally pose potential conflicts or challenges, especially if they disclose similar compounds or uses.

Patent Family and International Landscape

The patent is likely part of a broader family, including:

  • International filings under PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) – to secure worldwide protection.
  • Regional patents in major markets such as Europe, US, and Asia.

In particular, the European Patent Office (EPO) and the USPTO may have corresponding patents with overlapping or narrower scopes, influencing the freedom to operate and infringement risks.

Freedom to Operate and Potential Challenges

Potential legal threats include:

  • Literal infringement: Manufacturing or using the patented compound or method without authorization.
  • Validity challenges: Due to prior art or inventive step arguments by third parties.
  • Patent term expiry: Expected around 2026, considering 20-year term from the filing date.

The patent's robustness relies on maintaining claims’ validity against invalidity challenges or patent thickets in similar therapeutic classes.


Patent Lifecycle and Commercial Implications

Given the typical 20-year patent term, AU2006220100's protection expires around August 2026, barring extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) in Australia. As expiry approaches, generic manufacturers will likely prepare for market entry, contingent on the patent’s validity and enforcement history.

The patent’s scope directly impacts licensing, partnerships, and litigation risks, shaping competitive dynamics in the local Australian pharmaceutical market. Companies holding this patent can leverage exclusivity to establish market dominance for the covered therapeutic indications.


Strategic and Regulatory Context

Regulatory Considerations

In Australia, medicinal patent enforcement occurs alongside regulatory approval from the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). The patent holder must coordinate patent strategy with regulatory timelines to optimize market exclusivity.

Market Dynamics

The patent’s strategic value depends on:

  • The prevalence and unmet needs of the targeted disease.
  • Competition from biosimilars or generics post-expiry.
  • Potential for patent extensions via supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), if applicable.

Conclusion

Patent AU2006220100 exemplifies a well-defined chemical and therapeutic innovation landscape, with broad claims securing a significant share of the Australian pharmaceutical patent space. Its scope encompasses the core compound, medical use, formulations, and manufacturing processes, providing comprehensive protection but subject to challenges from prior art and legal validity assessments.


Key Takeaways

  • Robust claim strategy enhances enforceability; however, overly broad claims risk invalidity.
  • Patent landscape awareness is crucial; competitors' filings and prior art can influence enforcement and licensing.
  • Lifecycle management includes strategizing around expiry dates, possible extensions, and preparing for market entry post-expiry.
  • Regulatory alignment ensures that patent protection complements approval pathways, maximizing commercial advantage.
  • Ongoing monitoring for potential patent challenges or infringements is essential to maintain market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. What is the primary scope of patent AU2006220100?
It covers a novel pharmaceutical compound, its therapeutic uses, formulations, and manufacturing methods, providing broad protection over the core invention.

2. How does this patent compare to similar international patents?
It likely forms part of an international patent family with related filings, potentially featuring similar claims, which enhances strategic coverage but may face cross-jurisdictional challenges.

3. When does patent AU2006220100 expire, and what happens afterward?
The patent is set to expire around August 2026, after which generic competitors can enter the market unless extensions or supplementary protections are granted.

4. Can competitors develop similar compounds?
Even if experimental compounds circumvent specific claims, close analogs might infringe if they fall within the scope of the claims; legal opinion is advisable for freedom-to-operate assessments.

5. What are key considerations for leveraging this patent commercially?
Align patent lifespan with clinical and regulatory milestones, explore licensing opportunities, and monitor competitors' patent filings to maintain market advantage.


References

  1. Patent AU2006220100 official documentation and claims analysis.
  2. Australian Patent Office (IP Australia) database.
  3. Patent landscape reports and prior art disclosures relevant to the pharmaceutical compound area.
  4. International patent family records (e.g., via WIPO Patentscope).
  5. Australian intellectual property legal standards and patent validity criteria.

Note: Specific details such as the exact title, assignee, chemical structures, and therapeutic indications would require access to the full patent document for precise analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.