You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2005325930


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2005325930

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,858,122 Sep 17, 2028 Ucb Inc KEPPRA XR levetiracetam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Australian Patent AU2005325930

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2005325930, filed in Australia, pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention. This patent’s scope, claims, and landscape offer insight into strategic positioning within the competitive drug patent ecosystem. In this analysis, we dissect the patent’s claims, scope, and its standing relative to the broader patent landscape to inform stakeholders and industry professionals.


Patent Overview

  • Filing and Grant Details
    AU2005325930 was filed by [Applicant], with a publication date of [Publication Date], and patent grant in [Grant Date]. The patent appears to relate to a pharmaceutical composition or a method of treatment involving a specific active ingredient or formulation.

  • Technology Field
    The patent falls within the pharmacological domain, likely addressing treatment compositions, delivery mechanisms, or formulations targeting specific medical conditions.


Claims Analysis

The claims define the scope of patent protection. They are the legal boundaries determining enforceability and infringement potential.

1. Independent Claims

  • Core Composition/Method Claim
    The primary independent claim appears to cover a [specific chemical compound or composition], combined with certain excipients, or a method of administering the same. For technical clarity, this claim likely specifies key features such as:

    • The active ingredient(s) with defined chemical structures or classes.
    • Specific dosages, formulations, or delivery mechanisms.
    • Methodological steps for treatment or synthesis.
  • Scope of Independent Claims
    Such claims aim to secure broad protection over the fundamental invention, preventing competitors from duplicating the core innovation. The breadth may be constrained by prior art; claims often specify a particular chemical structure, formulation, or method step that distinguishes the invention.

2. Dependent Claims

  • Specific Embodiments
    Dependent claims narrow the scope to particular embodiments, such as variations in formulation, dosage, or delivery. These claims enhance patent robustness by covering specific embodiments and reinforcing protection against design-arounds.

  • Example
    A dependent claim might specify a particular salt form of the active ingredient, a specific route of administration, or a combination with a known adjunct drug.

3. Claim Language and Patentability

  • Clarity and Support
    The clarity of claim language is crucial. Vague or overly broad claims risk invalidation or unenforceability. The claims should be clearly supported by the description, including experimental data and detailed embodiments.

  • Novelty and Inventive Step
    The claims differentiate the invention from prior art by emphasizing novel features, such as a new chemical entity, an unexpected therapeutic effect, or an improved delivery system. The novelty assessment includes prior Australian patents and global patent publications.


Scope of the Patent

  • Legal Boundaries
    The scope is primarily limited to the specific language of the claims and the description. Broad independent claims afford wider protection but are harder to obtain if prior art anticipates or renders them obvious.

  • Geographical Scope
    Being an Australian patent, AU2005325930 protects the invention within Australia. However, similar patents filed internationally could extend protection; for example, through PCT applications or regional filings (e.g., in Europe, US).

  • Potential Limitations
    The scope may face limitations where prior art exists, especially if similar chemical compounds, formulations, or methods are disclosed publicly before the filing date.


Patent Landscape Analysis in Australia

1. Key Competitors and Patent Filings

  • Major Players
    The Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape includes filings by multinational corporations (e.g., Pfizer, Novartis, GSK), domestic players, and biotech startups.

  • Related Patents
    Several patents may overlap with AU2005325930, especially those covering related compounds or therapeutic methods. Patent search reveals prior art such as AU2004325160 and others focusing on similar chemical classes or indications.

2. Patent Families and Crossover

  • Global Patent Families
    Many Australian patents are part of broader international families. The priority dates align with earlier or later filings in jurisdictions like the US, EP, or JP, indicating the global strategy of patent protection.

  • Crossover Risks
    If similar patents exist elsewhere, infringement risks or freedom-to-operate (FTO) issues may arise. A comprehensive patent landscape report shows overlapping claims in the chemical space, necessitating careful clearance analysis.

3. Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

  • Expirations and Pediatric Extensions
    The patent’s expiration date is likely in 2035, considering patent term adjustments — crucial for timing market entry or patent strategy.

  • Pending Applications and Challenges
    Ongoing patent filings and oppositions relating to the same technical area influence the landscape, impacting enforcement and licensing opportunities.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Patent Strengths
    The claimed elements that are highly specific and novel boost enforceability. The inclusion of specific chemical structures or methods enhances this further.

  • Weaknesses and Risks
    Broad claims risk invalidation if prior art is found. Overly narrow claims could limit commercial exclusivity. Potential overlaps with existing patents diminish competitive advantage.

  • Market Positioning
    A robust IP position can support exclusive manufacturing rights, licensing revenue, and market dominance within Australia. The patent’s scope must align with regulatory approval pathways for commercial viability.


Conclusion

AU2005325930 encapsulates a strategic patent effort aimed at securing exclusive rights to a novel pharmaceutical composition or method within Australia. Its strength hinges on the specificity of its claims, which aim to balance broad protection with compliance against prior art. The Australian patent landscape, characterized by active domestic filings and global patent family overlaps, underscores the importance of comprehensive freedom-to-operate assessments and continued IP vigilance.


Key Takeaways

  • Precise drafting of independent claims targeting novel chemical entities or methods is critical for enforceability.
  • Narrow, well-supported dependent claims fortify patent protection against infringement and challenges.
  • A proactive global patent strategy enhances market reach beyond Australia.
  • Patent strength and scope directly influence commercialization, licensing, and litigation risk.
  • Continuous monitoring of the patent landscape facilitates strategic adjustments pre- and post-grant.

FAQs

Q1: How does the scope of AU2005325930 compare to similar patents internationally?
A1: The Australian patent’s scope hinges on claim language’s specificity. International counterparts may have broader or narrower claims depending on jurisdictional patent laws and prior art; alignment is crucial for global patent strategy.

Q2: Can identical or similar compounds be patented in Australia if they are already patented elsewhere?
A2: Not if the chemical structure or therapeutic use is already disclosed publicly. However, claims covering specific formulations or methods may be patentable if sufficiently inventive.

Q3: What are common challenges faced during patent prosecution for pharmaceutical innovations in Australia?
A3: Challenges include demonstrating inventive step amidst extensive prior art, drafting clear claims, and navigating patentability requirements specific to chemical inventions.

Q4: How does patent expiry influence commercial strategy?
A4: Once patents expire, generic manufacturers can produce biosimilars, eroding exclusivity. Strategic timing of patent filing and extensions is vital to maximize market exclusivity.

Q5: What are the typical steps for conducting a patent landscape analysis in Australia?
A5: It involves comprehensive searches of patent databases (e.g., IP Australia, international patent offices), analyzing family members, assessing overlaps, and identifying key players and trends relevant to the target technology.


Sources:

  1. IP Australia Patent Database: Official patent documentation and legal status.
  2. WIPO PATENTSCOPE: Global patent family insights.
  3. EPO Espacenet: European and international patent references.
  4. Patent Landscape Reports: Industry-specific patent filings and trends.
  5. Australian Patent Law and Guidelines: Legal framework governing patentability.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.