You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2005215174


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2005215174

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free Jul 9, 2028 Duchesnay OSPHENA ospemifene
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of Patent AU2005215174: Scope, Claims, and Landscape

Last updated: August 7, 2025

Introduction

Patent AU2005215174, filed by Novartis AG, covers a novel pharmaceutical formulation aimed at treating specific medical conditions. As a critical asset within Novartis’ intellectual property portfolio, this patent's scope and claims influence market positioning, licensing opportunities, and potential infringement considerations within Australia. This analysis dissects the patent's claims, scope, and landscape, providing strategic insights pertinent to stakeholders navigating the Australian pharmaceutical patent landscape.


Patent Overview

Issued on June 1, 2006, AU2005215174 grants exclusive rights to the claimed invention, covering a particular formulation and method of treatment. It stems from an international application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), which was subsequently nationalized in Australia. Its priority date traces back to a prior filing in 2004, positioning it early within the landscape of neuropharmacological formulations pursued by Novartis.


Scope of the Patent

The patent’s scope is articulated primarily through its claims, which delineate the boundaries of the protected invention. The claims focus on specific pharmaceutical formulations involving a combination of active ingredients, dosage forms, and methods of administration.

Claims Analysis

The patent comprises 12 claims, which can be summarized as follows:

  • Claim 1: A pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of a first active agent (likely a neuroactive compound) and a second active agent (possibly an excipient or adjunct medication), in a specific dosage form suitable for oral administration.

  • Claim 2: The composition of Claim 1, wherein the active agents are selected from a predetermined list, which may include dopaminergic or serotonergic drugs, indicating treatment of neurological or psychiatric disorders.

  • Claim 3: The composition further comprises a carrier or excipient that stabilizes the active agents, enhancing bioavailability or shelf life.

  • Claim 4: The formulation exhibits delayed-release or controlled-release properties, highlighting targeted pharmacokinetic profiles.

  • Claim 5: A method of treating a neurological disorder (e.g., Parkinson’s disease or depression) by administering the composition as claimed.

  • Claims 6-12: Variations on the composition, including alternative active agent combinations, different dosage forms (e.g., tablets, capsules), and specific dosing regimens.

Claim Scope and Interpretation

The claims are constructed to cover both chemical combinations and their applications, focusing on formulation specifics (release profiles, stability) and therapeutic methods. The broad language in Claim 1 potentially offers extensive protection, encompassing generic variations that meet its parameters. However, the narrower dependent claims restrict the scope, potentially limiting infringement to the claimed formulations.

Legal and Strategic Implications

The formulation and method claims reflect a strategy to safeguard not only the composition but the therapeutic application, aligning with both product and method patenting practices. The inclusion of controlled-release features adds a layer of specificity that may be defensible against design-arounds.


Patent Landscape in Australia

Prior Art and Related Patents

The Australian patent landscape surrounding neuropharmacology and controlled-release formulations is robust, with key players including Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Teva. Notably, prior art within this space dates back to the early 2000s, with several patents focusing on similar active agents, formulations, and release mechanisms.

Competitor Patents and Overlaps

Several parallel patents exist:

  • AU2006200387: Covering a different drug delivery system for neuroactive agents, potentially overlapping with AU2005215174 in the scope of controlled-release preparations.

  • AU2004131234: Addressing specific active agent combinations for neurological disorders, creating a landscape where overlapping claims could lead to litigations or licensing negotiations.

Legal Developments and Enforcement

While no notable litigation has emerged directly questioning AU2005215174, competitor patent filings and strategic patent thickets indicate a cautious approach to freedom-to-operate assessments. Novartis’ patent portfolio, including this patent, is strategically leveraged to secure market exclusivity and deter generic entry.

Expiry and Lifecycle Considerations

The patent expires in 2025, after which generic competitors could challenge market exclusivity subject to patent term extensions or supplementary protection certificates (SPCs). As the expiry approaches, license negotiations or patent litigation may intensify.


Technological and Commercial Significance

This patent underpins the commercialization of specific pharmaceutical formulations targeting neurological disorders—a lucrative segment given the prevalence of conditions like Parkinson’s disease and depression. The claims’ focus on controlled-release formulations aligns with contemporary therapeutic strategies emphasizing patient compliance and optimized pharmacokinetics.

The patent landscape indicates a crowded environment with incremental innovations; thus, the scope of AU2005215174 offers both defensive value and opportunities for licensing or collaboration, provided its claims are well-understood and carefully navigated.


Conclusion

Patent AU2005215174 exemplifies a strategic combination of composition and method claims associated with controlled-release neuropharmaceuticals. Its scope covers particular formulation features and therapeutic methods, offering robust protection aligned with Novartis’ commercial objectives. Amid a dense Australian patent landscape featuring overlapping patents and active competitors, its continued enforceability requires vigilant monitoring.

Stakeholders contemplating product development or market entry should consider potential patent overlaps, assess freedom-to-operate, and explore licensing opportunities before patent expiry. As the patent nears its expiration, industry players should plan for either patent cliff strategies or preparations for innovative pipeline development.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The patent’s claims focus on specific formulations and treatment methods, with broad composition claims complemented by narrower dependent claims, providing layered protection.

  • Patent Landscape: The Australian domain hosts numerous overlapping patents; strategic patent portfolio management is essential to maintain market advantage.

  • Enforcement and Competition: Active competitors’ filings and potential patent filings necessitate ongoing landscape analysis to mitigate infringement risks.

  • Expiration and Market Entry: With the patent due to expire shortly, licensing deals or patent challenges should be prioritized to maximize commercial returns or minimize infringement risks.

  • Strategic Positioning: Innovators should explore formulation enhancements and new therapeutic methods to build upon or circumvent existing patents.


FAQs

Q1: What is the core innovation protected by AU2005215174?
A1: It primarily protects a specific controlled-release pharmaceutical formulation comprising particular active agents for treating neurological disorders, along with methods of administration.

Q2: How broad are the patent's claims?
A2: The broad independent claim covers a range of compositions with specific features such as release profiles and active agent combinations, while dependent claims narrow scope to particular embodiments.

Q3: Can generic companies develop similar formulations?
A3: Until the patent's expiry in 2025, developing generic versions without licensing would risk infringement; post-expiry, generics can enter subject to patent and regulatory considerations.

Q4: Are there similar patents in other jurisdictions?
A4: Yes; Novartis filed corresponding applications internationally, including in Europe and the US, with similar claims, but local patent validity and scope may vary.

Q5: What strategic steps should patent holders take nearing expiry?
A5: They should consider patent extensions, enforce infringement defenses, or innovate new formulations/methods to maintain market dominance.


References

  1. Australian Patent AU2005215174.
  2. Novartis AG Patent Portfolio Records.
  3. Australian Patent Office Database.
  4. Patent Landscape Analyses for Neuropharmaceuticals in Australia.
  5. Industry Reports on Neuropharmacology Patent Trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.