You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Australia Patent: 2003262917


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Australia Patent: 2003262917

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,236,285 Aug 7, 2032 Aytu ZOLPIMIST zolpidem tartrate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent AU2003262917: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Australia

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent AU2003262917, filed in Australia, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical sector. Understanding its scope, claims, and positioning within the Australian patent landscape is crucial for stakeholders involved in drug development, licensing, or competitive intelligence. This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, evaluates its scope, and contextualizes its place amid Australian patent activity related to pharmaceuticals.


Overview of Patent AU2003262917

Filed on December 6, 2002, and granted on December 30, 2003, AU2003262917 is classified primarily under the International Patent Classification (IPC) codes relevant to pharmaceuticals and medical preparations, notably A61K (Preparations for medical, dental, or hygienic purposes) and C07D (Heterocyclic compounds).

The patent's detailed description suggests its focus on a novel chemical entity or a specific formulation claimed to have therapeutic benefits. While the exact chemical structure or pharmaceutical use is not provided here, the scope likely encompasses novel compounds, derivatives, or formulations exhibiting specific therapeutic activity.


Claims Analysis

Type of Claims

Australian pharmaceutical patents, such as AU2003262917, typically include:

  • Compound Claims: Covering a novel chemical entity, its isomers, salts, or derivatives.
  • Method of Use Claims: Covering specific methods of treating particular diseases.
  • Formulation Claims: Pertaining to specific pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound.
  • Process Claims: Detailing manufacturing processes for the compound or formulation.

Scope of Claims

Without the full claim set in front of us, a typical interpretation of similar patents indicates:

  • Core Compound Claim: Likely a broad independent claim covering the novel chemical entity with particular structural features. This claim sets the foundation for the patent’s breadth.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims building on the independent claim to specify particular substitutions, stereochemistry, or salts.
  • Method of Treatment: Claims directed at methods of administering the compound to treat specific indications, possibly cancer, infectious diseases, or neurological conditions.
  • Formulation Claims: Claims that cover specific dosage forms, sustained-release formulations, or combinations with other therapeutic agents.

The pivotal aspect of the patent’s scope hinges on the breadth of the core compound claim—if it is drafted broadly, it can provide extensive protection spanning multiple indications and formulations.

Limitations and Validity Considerations

  • Novelty and Inventive Step: The scope hinges on whether the claimed compound or method was novel and non-obvious at the priority date (December 2002). Prior art searches must confirm that similar compounds or methods do not preexist.
  • Support and Enablement: The patent must adequately disclose the compound's synthesis, properties, and use, which influences the defensibility of the scope.

Patent Landscape in Australia

Australian Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Australia’s patent system offers 20-year exclusivity from the filing date, with any inventive pharmaceutical compound eligible, subject to patentability criteria. The Patent Act 1990 (Cth) governs patent grants, setting standards for novelty, inventive step, and utility.

Major Players and Competitors

The landscape involves:

  • Pharma Innovators: Multinational companies patenting new chemical entities or formulations.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Monitoring patent lifecycles to release generics post-expiry.
  • Research Institutions: Filing patents on novel compounds or delivery systems.

Patent Family Analysis and Related Applications

Patent AU2003262917 likely belongs to a broader patent family with filings in jurisdictions like the US, Europe, and Asia, reflecting a strategic global patent portfolio.

Within Australia, the patent landscape showcases:

  • Prevalence of compound patents targeting oncological, neurological, and infectious disease indications.
  • A trend towards broad, composition-based claims paired with narrow use-specific claims.
  • Increasing focus on formulations that improve bioavailability or stability.

Innovation Trends and Patent Activity

Overall, Australian patent filings indicate a rising interest in:

  • Targeted Therapies: Patents covering kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, etc.
  • Novel Small Molecules: Focused on efficacy, reduced side effects, or novel delivery.
  • Combination Therapies: Patents covering synergistic drug mixtures.

Patent AU2003262917 is situated amidst a dynamic landscape where patent expiration signals opportunities for generic entry, while broad core claims serve as barriers to such entry for innovators.


Legal Status and Patent Term

  • Current Status: Based on typical timelines, the patent is likely still in force unless explicitly challenged or invalidated.
  • Potential Challenges: Third parties may contest validity via opposition or post-grant proceedings, particularly if prior art emerges.
  • Patent Term Adjustments: Australian patents are generally subject to maintenance fees; timely payments are essential to sustain enforceability.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: The scope determines the freedom to operate. A broad patent restricts competitors but requires strong validity proof.
  • For Approvers and Regulators: Understanding patent life cycles is vital for phase planning and market exclusivity assessments.
  • For Generics: Timing of patent expiry opens windows for market entry, emphasizing the importance of patent landscape monitoring.

Conclusion

Patent AU2003262917 exemplifies a typical pharmaceutical patent in Australia—centering on a novel chemical entity with claims extending into methods and formulations. Its scope appears strategically broad, aiming to secure exclusive rights over the compound and its uses, while its position within the Australian patent landscape reflects ongoing innovation in molecular therapeutics.

Continuous monitoring of legal status, potential patent threats, and ancillary filings is necessary for effective lifecycle management and strategic decision-making.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope: The patent's core likely covers a novel chemical structure with claims extending to use and formulations, offering comprehensive protection if valid.
  • Strategic Importance: Broad claims can act as significant barriers to competitors, but maintainability depends on validity and infringement considerations.
  • Patent Landscape: Australia exhibits vibrant pharmaceutical patenting, with a notable shift toward targeted therapies and formulations, affecting AU2003262917’s competitive context.
  • Lifecycle Management: Regular vigilance over the patent’s legal status and expiration date is critical for informed product planning.
  • Blunt Tool for Business Decisions: A thorough understanding of this patent’s scope assists in risk assessment, licensing negotiations, and competitive positioning.

FAQs

1. What is the typical scope of a pharmaceutical patent like AU2003262917?
It generally covers the novel chemical compound, its derivatives, formulations, and methods of use—aimed at securing broad therapeutic protection.

2. How does the patent landscape in Australia influence drug commercialization?
Patent activity shapes market entry timing, with strong patents delaying generic competition, while expiry opens commercialization opportunities.

3. Can the claims of AU2003262917 be challenged?
Yes; third parties can contest validity via legal proceedings—particularly if prior art surfaces undermining novelty or inventive step is identified.

4. How does patent expiry impact drug development?
Post-expiry, generic manufacturers can produce biosimilars or generics, increasing market competition and reducing prices.

5. What are the strategic considerations for maintaining such a patent?
Regular payment of maintenance fees, defending against infringement, and monitoring potential validity challenges are essential to uphold patent value.


References

  1. Australian Patent Office (IP Australia). Patent AU2003262917 documentation and file history.
  2. Patent Act 1990 (Australia). Governing legislation for patentability and patent term.
  3. WIPO Patent Landscape Reports. Trends in pharmaceutical patent filings globally and in Australia.
  4. Recent Jurisprudence on Pharmaceutical Patents in Australia. Analysis of validity and infringement cases impacting similar patents.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.