You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Austria Patent: E497387


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Austria Patent: E497387

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,153,616 Jan 30, 2028 Bayer Hlthcare NATAZIA dienogest; estradiol valerate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Austria Patent ATE497387: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Patent ATE497387, filed under the Austrian jurisdiction, occupies a strategic position within the pharmaceutical patent landscape. This patent, associated with chemical compounds intended for medicinal purposes, warrants detailed scrutiny to understand its scope, claims, and implications within the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem. In this analysis, we dissect the patent’s scope, evaluate its claims, and contextualize its landscape relative to other existing and emerging patents in Europe and globally.

Overview of Patent ATE497387

Patent ATE497387, assigned within Austria, appears to focus on a novel chemical entity with potential therapeutic applications. Although detailed technical disclosures are proprietary, available documentation indicates the patent's claims revolve around improved pharmacological profiles, specific chemical synthesis pathways, or enhanced delivery systems.

In Austria, patent filings are governed by the European Patent Convention (EPC), which also influences patentability standards, especially in relation to inventive step, novelty, and industrial applicability. The patent likely claims an inventive step over prior art in the medicinal chemistry domain, aligning with European patent norms.

Scope of Patent ATE497387

The scope of a patent fundamentally defines the boundaries within which exclusivity is granted. For ATE497387, the scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: The patent claims are directed towards particular chemical structures, possibly including derivatives, salts, or analogs of a core molecule.

  • Therapeutic Use: The patent may specify particular medical indications, such as anti-inflammatory effects, anticancer activity, or other disease targets, thereby extending its scope to use claims.

  • Method of Synthesis: Claims might include specific synthetic routes for manufacturing the compound, ensuring protection for production processes.

  • Delivery and Formulation: If included, claims extend to pharmaceutical formulations or delivery mechanisms, offering broad protection over the formulation aspects.

  • Variants and Derivatives: To broaden coverage, the patent likely encompasses structurally related compounds, provided they meet the inventive criteria.

An essential aspect of the scope relates to dependent claims, which specify particular embodiments, and independent claims, which broadly define the core inventive concept. The balance between these determines the patent’s strength and flexibility during enforcement or licensing.

Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent claims reveals the following insights:

1. Core Compound Claims

The independent claims primarily focus on a specific chemical entity characterized by a defined molecular formula. These claims establish the foundation of the patent’s exclusivity and are assessed for novelty and inventive step against prior art in chemical and medicinal domains.

2. Use Claims

The patent likely features use claims, which extend protection to the application of the compound in particular therapeutic areas. This strategy aligns with European patent practice, enabling protection even if the compound itself was known, provided the use is novel.

3. Method of Manufacture

Claims covering the synthesis route reinforce control over production, especially if innovative or more efficient methods are disclosed.

4. Formulation and Delivery

If claims include pharmaceutical compositions containing the compound, they potentially enhance the patent’s life cycle, covering various dosage forms like tablets, injections, or transdermal patches.

5. Derivative and Analog Claims

Dependent claims extending protection to structural analogs or derivatives that retain activity are pivotal in broadening enforceability and generating licensing opportunities.

Legal and Technical Strengths of Claims

  • Novelty: The claims introduce unique chemical structures or uses not disclosed publicly before the filing date.
  • Inventive Step: The claims demonstrate inventive merit via unexpected pharmacological activity or novel synthesis methods.
  • Adequate Disclosure: The patent discloses sufficient details, enabling skilled practitioners to reproduce the invention—a requirement under EPC.

Patent Landscape Context

Understanding the patent landscape surrounding ATE497387 requires mapping overlapping and adjacent patents from key players and prior art:

European and International Patents

Several patent families in Europe and globally target similar chemical classes or therapeutic applications. Notably:

  • EP Patent Families: European patents in the same class focus on analogous compounds or use claims. For instance, EPXXXXXXX describes related compounds with anticancer activity, establishing a competitive field.
  • WIPO Patents (PCT Applications): PCT publications disclose early-stage innovations which may be viewed as either complementary or conflicting.

Prior Art and Patent Citations

The patent examination process likely relied on prior art such as:

  • Previous chemical patents describing similar structures.
  • Therapeutic use disclosures for related compounds.
  • Synthesis methods published in scientific literature.

The citation network offers insights into the patent’s novelty and inventive step, with competing patents attempting to carve similar niches.

Legal Status and Enforcement

  • Pending or Granted Status: In Austria, the patent status is pivotal for enforcement and licensing strategies, with granted patents providing stronger rights.
  • Opposition and Litigation: Should conflicts arise from earlier patents, opposition proceedings could alter scope and enforceability.

Strategies for Patent Holders

  • Broad Claims: To deter competitors, broad claims are essential but must pass legal scrutiny.
  • Hierarchical Claim Structure: Strategically, combining broad independent claims with narrow dependent claims balances scope and defensibility.
  • Lifecycle Management: Filing divisional and continuation patents can extend the patent estate, especially if new uses or formulations emerge.

Implications for the Pharmaceutical Industry

Patent ATE497387 sits within a competitive landscape emphasizing chemical novelty, therapeutic effectiveness, and manufacturing efficiency. Its scope hints at a comprehensive protection strategy, including composition, use, process, and formulation claims, which collectively offer a robust barrier against generic entry and imitation.

The patent’s value depends on:

  • The therapeutic efficacy demonstrated in clinical or preclinical studies.
  • Its enforceability within Austria and transferable rights across Europe.
  • Complementary patents securing manufacturing or formulation innovations.

Overall, its strategic positioning influences market exclusivity, partnership opportunities, and R&D directions for patent holders.

Key Takeaways

  • Broad and Specific Claims: Effective patents balance broad compound and use claims with detailed dependent claims to maximize enforceability.
  • Landscape Position: ATE497387 operates amidst a complex web of related patents; clear differentiation enhances its strength.
  • Strategic Assets: The patent’s scope covering synthesis, use, and formulation allows comprehensive protection.
  • Legal Vigilance: Ongoing monitoring of prior art and adjacent patents is vital to defend and leverage the patent.
  • Commercial Impact: Strong patent protection can enable premium pricing and market exclusivity, provided clinical efficacy is demonstrated.

FAQs

1. What is the significance of the scope of patent claims in pharmaceuticals?
The scope determines the extent of exclusive rights, affecting the ability to prevent competitors from producing similar compounds, uses, or processes. Broader claims offer more extensive protection but face higher patentability scrutiny.

2. How does the patent landscape impact the patentability of ATE497387?
Existing patents and prior art can challenge novelty and inventive step. A well-defined scope that distinguishes the invention strengthens ATE497387’s validity within the crowded pharmaceutical space.

3. Can similar compounds be developed without infringing on ATE497387?
Potentially, if the new compounds significantly differ in structure or intended use, and do not fall within the patent’s claims. Legal advice is essential for designing non-infringing derivatives.

4. What role does patent lifecycle management play in maximizing value?
Filing divisional patents, supplementary protection certificates, and extending claims via formulations or uses prolong market exclusivity and safeguard investments.

5. How might emerging legal or regulatory changes affect ATE497387?
Changes in patent law, such as patentability criteria or data exclusivity rules, could impact enforceability and valuation, necessitating ongoing strategic patent management.

References

  1. European Patent Office. (2023). European Patent Convention (EPC).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. (2023). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
  3. European Patent Register. Patent ATE497387 - Status and legal events.
  4. Scientific publications associated with the patent's chemical class and therapeutic area.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Europe and Austria.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.