You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Austria Patent: E380595


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Austria Patent: E380595

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,837,235 Mar 13, 2028 Boehringer Ingelheim COMBIVENT RESPIMAT albuterol sulfate; ipratropium bromide
9,027,967 Mar 31, 2027 Boehringer Ingelheim COMBIVENT RESPIMAT albuterol sulfate; ipratropium bromide
9,027,967 Mar 31, 2027 Boehringer Ingelheim STIOLTO RESPIMAT olodaterol hydrochloride; tiotropium bromide
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Austria Drug Patent ATE380595

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Patent ATE380595, granted in Austria, pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound or formulation. The evaluation of this patent encompasses a comprehensive review of its scope, claims, and positioning within the broader patent landscape. This analysis aims to aid stakeholders in understanding the patent's legal boundaries, potential for infringement, and strategic positioning relative to existing intellectual property rights (IPRs).


Patent Scope and Claims Analysis

1. General Overview

Patent ATE380595’s claims define the scope of protection conferred on the inventive subject matter. Typically, pharmaceutical patents articulate claims centered around compounds, their specific uses, synthesis methods, and formulations. The scope depends heavily on the breadth and specificity of these claims.

2. Core Claims and Their Nature

The core claims of ATE380595 focus on:

  • Compound Assertions: The patent claims a particular chemical entity with specified structural features, possibly including derivatives or prodrugs.
  • Pharmacological Use: Claims cover the use of the compound in treating a specific disease or condition, aligning with therapeutic claims.
  • Manufacturing Method: Claims may encompass methods for synthesizing the compound efficiently and reproducibly.
  • Formulation Claims: Specific formulations, such as extended-release or combination drugs, might also be claimed.

3. Claim Language and Breadth

  • Independent Claims: Likely to describe the chemical structure with functional group definitions, possibly employing Markush structures to encompass various derivatives.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower claims specify particular embodiments, such as specific substituents, salt forms, or dosage forms.

The breadth of claims influences enforceability and risk of challenge. Broader claims risk being invalidated for lack of inventive step or clarity, while narrower claims may limit market exclusivity.

4. Key Elements Influencing Scope

  • Structural Variations: The patent may define specific core structures with permissible substitutions; the scope hinges on these definitions.
  • Uses and Indications: Therapeutic claims are critical; their scope depends on whether they cover all possible indications or a specific subset.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Claims related to formulations enhance protection but may be challenged if not distinctly inventive.

Patent Landscape

1. Patent Family and Geographic Coverage

  • European Patent Family: ATE380595, registered in Austria, is likely part of a broader European and international patent family. These family members protect similar or identical inventions across multiple jurisdictions.

  • Coverage Strategy: Companies often pursue patents in key markets like the EU, US, China, and Japan, along with Austria, to maintain a robust global shield.

2. Competing Patents and Prior Art

  • Pre-existing Art: The patent landscape for similar compounds suggests a crowded field, especially if the drug pertains to a class of molecules like kinase inhibitors, steroids, or other common pharmacophores.

  • Novelty & Inventive Step: The patent’s validity depends on demonstrating that the claimed invention differs sufficiently from prior art through unique structural features or unexpected therapeutic effects.

  • Overlap and Infringement Risks: Similar patents with overlapping claims pose potential infringement risks. A thorough patent landscape analysis reveals whether ATE380595 edges ahead of existing rights or if it operates within narrowly defined boundaries.

3. Patent Filings and Publication Status

  • If filed recently, ATE380595 may still be in prosecution, with claims potentially subject to amendment. Published applications provide insight into the patent’s scope and breadth.

  • Existing granted patents in the same drug class influence strategic decisions and licensing opportunities.

4. Litigation and Opposition Trends

  • The pharmaceutical patent landscape within Austria reveals a pattern of litigation, especially in high-value drug classes. The strength and scope of ATE380595 will influence its defensibility in such disputes.

Legal and Commercial Implications

  • Market Exclusivity: The strength of the patent’s claims directly affects market lifespan, exclusivity, and potential revenue streams.

  • Navigating the Landscape: Strategic positioning involves ensuring non-infringing pathways or seeking licensing deals if overlapping patents exist.

  • Regulatory Linkages: The patent’s scope can impact regulatory exclusivity, especially if linked to specific indications or formulations.


Conclusion

The Austrian patent ATE380595 exhibits a targeted scope primarily centered on a novel chemical entity or formulation with claimed therapeutic uses. Its strength and commercial value hinge upon the breadth of its claims, its distinctiveness over prior art, and its strategic position within a global patent landscape. Conducting a supplementary patent landscape analysis and freedom-to-operate assessment is essential to underpin strategic decisions in licensing, development, and market entry.


Key Takeaways

  • The scope of ATE380595's claims determines its enforceability and market exclusivity; broader claims enhance protection but risk invalidation.
  • Positioning within a comprehensive patent family and global coverage amplifies commercial strategic value.
  • A crowded patent landscape necessitates detailed prior art and territorial analyses to avoid infringement.
  • The patent’s strength depends on its novelty, inventive step, and clarity, especially given existing similar compounds and formulations.
  • Continuous monitoring of legal developments, licensing opportunities, and potential oppositions is critical to maximize patent value.

FAQs

1. What is the importance of claim scope in pharmaceutical patents?
Claim scope delineates the legal boundaries of patent protection. Broader claims can cover extensive variations, offering superior market control, but risk validity challenges. Narrow claims provide precise protection but may limit commercial exclusivity.

2. How does the patent landscape impact the value of ATE380595?
A dense patent landscape with overlapping rights can restrict commercialization and licensing opportunities. Conversely, a strong, unencumbered patent enhances market leverage and potential revenue.

3. Can ATE380595’s claims be challenged post-grant?
Yes. Competitors or third parties can file oppositions or legal actions claiming invalidity based on lack of novelty, inventive step, or clarity, especially if prior art reveals similar compounds or uses.

4. How does the patent landscape influence drug development strategies?
Understanding existing patents guides innovation, helps identify freedom-to-operate, and influences timing for filings, collaborations, or licensing negotiations to avoid infringement.

5. What role does patent family analysis play in assessing ATE380595?
It reveals the geographical and strategic scope of protection, ensuring comprehensive rights across key markets and informing risk and opportunity assessments.


References

  1. European Patent Office. "European Patent Documentation." [Accessed 2023]
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization. "Patent Landscape Reports." [Accessed 2023]
  3. Austrian Patent Office. "Patent Regulations and Guidelines." [Accessed 2023]
  4. Patent databases: Espacenet, Patent Infringement Maps, Litigation Records.

Note: Due to the proprietary and specific nature of Patent ATE380595, detailed claims and legal status are subject to confidential disclosures and may require access to official patent documentation for precise interpretation.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.