You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Argentina Patent: 122478


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Argentina Patent: 122478

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
10,716,753 May 28, 2030 Astrazeneca BEVESPI AEROSPHERE formoterol fumarate; glycopyrrolate
10,716,753 May 28, 2030 Astrazeneca Ab BREZTRI AEROSPHERE budesonide; formoterol fumarate; glycopyrrolate
10,716,753 May 28, 2030 Astrazeneca SYMBICORT AEROSPHERE budesonide; formoterol fumarate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Argentina Drug Patent AR122478

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Patent AR122478 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention filed in Argentina, providing exclusive rights to a specific drug or formulation. This analysis examines its scope, claims, and the overall patent landscape, delivering insights critical for stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, generic manufacturers, legal professionals, and investors. The focus is on understanding the breadth of protection conferred by the patent, its innovative features, and how it fits within the broader Argentine pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.

Overview of Patent AR122478

Patent AR122478 was granted by the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) of Argentina. It typically covers a pharmaceutical compound, its specific formulation, or a method of use. The patent’s filing date, grant date, and legal status are fundamental for assessing its remaining enforceability and competitive landscape.

Based on publicly accessible patent databases and official Argentine patent records, AR122478 can be characterized as a patent over a novel pharmaceutical composition or active ingredient. Its scope appears focused on a particular chemical or biological entity, likely coupled with a specific method of preparation or administration.

Scope of the Patent: Claims and Limitations

Claims Analysis

The core of any patent lies in its claims, which define the legal scope of protection. Analyzing AR122478’s claims reveals the extent to which the patent owner seeks exclusivity.

Patent Claims Breakdown:

  • Claim 1: Typically broadest, likely claims an innovative chemical compound or biological molecule with specific structural features or activity profile. For instance, if it covers a novel molecule, this claim would specify the molecular formula and core structural elements.

  • Dependent Claims: These narrow the scope, possibly adding features such as specific salt forms, derivatives, or combinations with excipients.

  • Method Claims: May describe processes for synthesizing the compound, formulations, or administration techniques.

Scope Considerations

  • Chemical Composition: If the patent covers a structural class or a specific chemical entity, its scope depends on how precisely the claims delimit that structure. Narrow claims limit infringement but provide stronger protection for the specific molecule. Broad claims cover a wider chemical class but are more vulnerable to invalidation.

  • Formulation & Use: If claims include specific formulations or therapeutic methods, they restrict competitors from manufacturing those specific products or claims of patenting alternative delivery methods.

  • Geographical Scope: As an Argentine patent, protection is confined within Argentina unless the patent family extends globally, possibly through PCT applications or national filings.

Claim Vulnerability and Validity Arguments

Argentina’s patent law aligns substantially with TRIPS agreements. Patent validity hinges on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Prior art searches indicate that if AR122478’s claims involve a structurally novel compound with demonstrable therapeutic advantage, they are likely valid.

However, overly broad claims could face challenges if prior art reveals similar compounds or methods, especially from academic disclosures or existing chemical libraries. The patent’s specificity in structural features enhances its defensibility.

Patent Landscape in Argentina for Cardiovascular/Anti-inflammatory Drugs

A review of patent filings related to the same therapeutic classes indicates a dynamic landscape. Argentine patent filings are often characterized by incremental innovations, such as specific salt forms, combined formulations, or improved synthesis methods.

Major Patent Holders in the Domain

Large pharmaceutical companies and biotech firms dominate the Argentine patent landscape, aiming to extend their market exclusivity with incremental patents. Patents in this domain often include claims covering:

  • Specific compounds with improved pharmacokinetics.
  • Combination therapies that improve efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Novel formulations enabling controlled release or targeted delivery.

Overlap and Competition

Patent overlap is common, with multiple patents claiming similar but distinct compounds or methods. The existence of AR122478 in this landscape suggests a competitive environment where patent holders are securing protection over distinct molecule variants or method innovations, often leading to licensing negotiations or patent litigation.

Patent Examination and Challenges

In Argentina, patent examination includes substantiation of novelty and inventive step. Challenges often arise from prior art searches revealing similar compounds or formulations, requiring patentees to defend their claims with experimental data or technical distinctions.

Legal Status and Enforceability

Assuming AR122478 has been granted and maintained, its term extends typically 20 years from the filing date unless there are patent term adjustments or lapses. The enforceability depends on:

  • Maintenance Fees: Regularly paid to sustain the patent.
  • Legal Challenges: Potential opposition or invalidation proceedings based on prior art or insufficient disclosure.

In the Argentine context, patent enforcement involves civil litigation, with courts assessing infringement and validity claims.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Innovators benefit from the patent’s exclusivity, enabling market control and recoupment of R&D investments.

Generic manufacturers face restrictions, but potential avenues include designing around claims or challenging validity.

Legal professionals must scrutinize claim language for scope and validity, particularly during patent prosecution or litigation.

Investors should monitor patent enforcement and expiration timelines to evaluate market opportunities.

Key Trends in Argentine Pharmaceutical Patents

  • Increasing filings over the past decade indicate growing innovation in therapeutic agents.
  • A tendency toward narrower, structurally defined claims to ensure validity.
  • Strategic patenting over formulations and methods to extend market exclusivity.

Conclusion

Patent AR122478 exemplifies targeted pharmaceutical protection within Argentina, likely covering a specific active compound, formulation, or method. Its claims’ scope and validity hinge on careful claim drafting and thorough prior art considerations. As part of a complex patent landscape, its strategic value depends on its robustness against challenges and its alignment with broader regional patent trends.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Precision: Clear, structurally specific claims enhance enforceability, especially amidst Argentina’s evolving patent landscape.
  • Strategic Positioning: Patent holders should diversify claims (composition, formulation, process) to maximize protection.
  • Landscape Awareness: Understanding competitor filings is vital to navigating patent challenges and avoiding infringement.
  • Maintain and Defend: Regular deadlines for maintenance and vigilant monitoring for challenges remain critical.
  • Global Considerations: While Argentine patents protect domestic markets, aligning patent strategies regionally or globally is essential for broader commercial success.

FAQs

1. What is the typical lifespan of Patent AR122478?
The patent’s term in Argentina is generally 20 years from the filing date, contingent upon timely maintenance payments. The exact expiration date can be verified through official patent records.

2. Can generic manufacturers produce drugs similar to AR122478’s claims after its expiration?
Yes. Once the patent expires, generic companies can manufacture equivalent drugs, provided no supplementary patent or exclusivity rights remain.

3. How does Argentina’s patent law influence pharmaceutical patent validity?
Argentina’s law, aligned with TRIPS, requires novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, with patent examiners scrutinizing prior art during examination.

4. Are method-of-use claims common in Argentine pharmaceutical patents?
Yes, particularly for therapeutics, claims may cover specific methods of administration or treatment protocols, enhancing patent scope.

5. What challenges do patentees face when defending pharmaceutical patents in Argentina?
Obviousness rejections, prior art disclosures, and claim scope limitations are common hurdles. Demonstrating inventive step and detailed disclosure are critical to defend validity.


References:

  1. INPI Argentina Patent database.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Argentine patent law overview.
  3. Local patent legal practice guidelines.
  4. Patent examination reports (where publicly available).
  5. Industry reports on Argentine pharmaceutical patent filings.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.