You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Profile for Argentina Patent: 104771


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Argentina Patent: 104771

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,415,008 Apr 6, 2035 Teva Pharm AIRDUO DIGIHALER fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
9,415,008 Apr 6, 2035 Teva Pharm AIRDUO RESPICLICK fluticasone propionate; salmeterol xinafoate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Comprehensive Analysis of Argentina Patent AR104771: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: August 2, 2025

Introduction

Patent AR104771 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical invention registered in Argentina, reflecting regional innovation efforts and protected intellectual property rights within the country’s pharmaceutical landscape. This analysis dissects the scope, claims, and broader patent environment surrounding AR104771, providing stakeholders with critical insights into its strategic significance, enforceability, and comparative position within regional and global patent ecosystems.


Patent Overview and Filing Background

Argentina’s National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) granted patent AR104771, with the application filed in [insert year, if known], showcasing an invention in the realm of drug development—most likely targeting a therapeutic compound, formulation, or delivery system specific to medical needs recognized within Argentina’s healthcare framework. The patent’s legal scope primarily helps secure commercial rights and deters unauthorized use or generic competition.


Scope of Patent AR104771

Type and Nature of the Patent

AR104771 appears to be a standard patent, granting exclusive rights over a novel pharmaceutical compound, its specific formulations, or methods of manufacturing or administering the drug. The patent’s scope hinges on the breadth and specificity of its claims, designed to cover inventive aspects far enough to prevent ease of circumvention but sufficient to allow future development.

Claims and Their Significance

The patent’s claims define its scope, delineating the boundaries of protection. These claims can broadly be categorized into:

  • Compound Claims: Covering the chemical entity or active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), including molecular structure, stereochemistry, or derivatives.
  • Process Claims: Covering the unique process used to synthesize or formulate the active ingredient.
  • Formulation/Use Claims: Covering specific drug formulations, delivery devices, or therapeutic indications.

The patent likely includes a core independent claim directed at the key invention—possibly a novel compound or an innovative formulation—supported by multiple dependent claims that specify particular embodiments or manufacturing parameters. The breadth of these claims determines the scope of exclusivity; narrower claims provide limited protection but are easier to defend, while broader claims potentially cover a wider array of variants but are more susceptible to challenge.

Novelty and Inventive Step

AR104771’s patentability hinges on demonstrating:

  • Novelty: The invention must be new relative to prior art—public disclosures, existing patents, or scientific publications—before the filing date. An extensive prior art search would confirm whether the claimed compounds or processes have been previously disclosed.
  • Inventive Step: The invention must not be obvious to a person skilled in the art at the time of filing, considering the prior art references.

These criteria ensure that AR104771 provides a meaningful innovation over existing pharmaceutical knowledge, justifying its grant.


Patent Claims Analysis

While the full patent document’s claims are not provided here, an informed generalization based on typical pharmaceutical patents suggests:

  • Independent Claim(s): Likely describe a novel compound with specified structural features or a unique therapeutic application, emphasizing the inventive contribution. For instance, it may claim a specific chemical structure with claimed pharmacological properties.
  • Dependent Claims: Detail variations such as different salt forms, pharmaceutical compositions, manufacturing methods, dosage regimens, or specific indications.

The scope of claims is crucial for competitive positioning. Narrow claims limit market reach but reduce invalidity risk, whereas broader claims maximize protection but face higher invalidity challenges. Therefore, patent applicants often balance breadth with defensibility.


Patent Landscape Context in Argentina

Regional Patent Environment

Argentina operates within the framework established by the ARIPO (African Regional Intellectual Property Organization) and the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), aligning its standards with international norms. AR104771’s validity and enforceability are influenced by Argentina’s patent laws, which mandate strict examination focusing on novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability.

Patent Families and International Positioning

AR104771’s patent family likely extends to other jurisdictions, especially where market size justifies broader protection, such as Brazil, Chile, or the wider Latin American region. The patent’s local scope can complement or contrast with external filings, impacting global intellectual property strategies.

Competitive Patent Landscape

Argentina’s pharmaceutical patent landscape is characterized by:

  • Domestic innovation and local filings, especially for niche or region-specific therapies.
  • Trade secrets and open licensing as complementary strategies to patenting.
  • Litigation and patent challenges primarily revolving around patent validity, scope, and infringement.

The landscape reveals a cautious approach to broad claims, with patent office scrutinizing for inventive step, especially for biologics or complex chemical entities, aligning with global patent standards.


Legal and Commercial Implications

Enforceability and Limitations

AR104771’s enforceability depends on clear claim scope, valid status, and absence of prior art challenges. Patent infringement can be litigated if unauthorized manufacturing, sale, or use occurs within Argentina.

Market Exclusivity and Competition

The patent grants exclusive rights typically for 20 years from the filing date, barring claims of invalidity or patent office challenges. Patent holders can leverage this monopoly to recover R&D investments and establish market dominance for the protected drug.

Potential Challenges

  • Patent Oppositions or Litigation: Competitors or patent examiners may contest claims if they believe prior art invalidates the patent.
  • Parallel Importation: International patent statuses can influence regional market dynamics, especially when similar patents exist abroad.
  • Biosimilar and Generic Entry: Post-expiration, the patent landscape influences biosimilar or generic development—critical in Latin American markets with emerging pharmaceutical industries.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Innovators: Secure broad, defensible claims, monitor regional patent filings, and actively enforce rights to maximize market position.
  • For Competitors: Conduct thorough freedom-to-operate analyses, identify potential invalidity grounds, and consider designing around the claims.
  • For Regulators: Ensure robust patent examination aligned with international standards to promote genuine innovation.

Key Takeaways

  • AR104771’s patent scope is primarily defined by its claims, focusing on specific pharmaceutical compounds or formulations. The breadth of these claims directly impacts market exclusivity and competitive robustness.
  • Argentina’s patent landscape for pharmaceuticals emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial application, with regional patent filings often aligned with broader Latin American strategies.
  • The patent’s enforceability hinges on its validity today—challenges may arise from prior art or scope disputes, emphasizing the importance of strategic claim drafting and diligent prosecution.
  • The invention’s innovation should be assessed not only on technical merits but also from a legal standpoint, ensuring that claims are sufficient to withstand future challenges.
  • For market actors, understanding patent landscape nuances aids in strategic planning, whether in launching generic products, licensing, or enforcing patent rights.

FAQs

  1. What is the principal protection offered by patent AR104771?
    The patent offers exclusive rights to a specific drug compound or formulation, preventing unauthorized manufacturing, sale, or use within Argentina for approximately 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance.

  2. Can AR104771 be challenged or revoked?
    Yes. It can be challenged via procedural oppositions or invalidity actions citing prior art or insufficient inventive step, which could lead to revocation if successful.

  3. Does the patent landscape support international patent protection?
    While AR104771 is Argentine-specific, its inventors likely pursued broader protections through regional or international applications, such as under the PCT or regional patents, to secure wider market coverage.

  4. What should innovators consider when drafting claims for pharmaceutical patents in Argentina?
    Claims should be precise, inventive, and sufficiently broad to cover potential infringing formulations but specific enough to withstand validity challenges.

  5. How does local patent law influence drug development in Argentina?
    Argentina’s patent law emphasizes advancing innovation, but also permits compulsory licensing and exceptions for public health, impacting how companies strategize patent filings and enforcement.


Sources

  1. Argentina INPI patent database — for official patent document details.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) — for international patent strategy.
  3. Argentine patent law (Law No. 24,481) — governing patentability standards and enforcement.
  4. Patent landscape reports for Latin America — for regional comparison.
  5. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent filings in Argentina — for contextual insights.

Note: Detailed claims and procedural history of AR104771 are not publicly available in this document and should be reviewed directly from the Argentine Patent Office for comprehensive legal analysis.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.