You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Argentina Patent: 077635


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Argentina Patent: 077635

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,399,469 Jun 29, 2025 Otsuka Pharm Co Ltd ABILIFY MAINTENA KIT aripiprazole
8,399,469 Jun 29, 2025 Otsuka ABILIFY ASIMTUFII aripiprazole
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of Patent AR077635: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape in Argentina

Last updated: July 31, 2025

Introduction

Patent AR077635 represents a significant legal instrument within Argentina’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. As a jurisdiction with evolving intellectual property (IP) regulations influenced by international standards, Argentina's patent system offers insights into the scope of innovator protections, market exclusivity, and competitive dynamics in the pharmaceutical sector. This report provides a detailed examination of the patent’s scope and claims, alongside an overview of the broader patent landscape related to this patent, aiding stakeholders in strategic decision-making.

Patent Overview

AR077635 was granted on [specific date not provided in the prompt], with the patent applicant registered as [applicant name, if known], and generally relates to a pharmaceutical invention. While specific technical details are not provided here, the patent's claims typically cover a novel compound or a specific formulation, method of manufacture, or use in therapy consistent with standard patent practices in Argentina.

Scope of the Patent

Scope delineates the extent of exclusivity conferred by the patent, defining what constitutes infringement and what remains free for competitors. The scope in pharmaceutical patents primarily hinges on the breadth of claims—broad claims restrict competition significantly, whereas narrow claims afford limited exclusivity.

Claims Analysis

The patent claims provide precise boundaries of the invention’s protection. They are typically categorized into:

  • Compound claims: Define the chemical entity or a class of derivatives.
  • Use claims: Cover new therapeutic indications or methods of treatment.
  • Formulation claims: Encompass specific pharmaceutical compositions.
  • Process claims: Cover manufacturing methods.

In the case of AR077635, the claims likely focus on a novel chemical compound having specific structural features that demonstrate enhanced efficacy, stability, or bioavailability in a therapeutic context. Alternatively, they may claim a new use of a known compound, given the common practice of broadening patent protection in pharmacology.

Key aspects of the claims include:

  • Claim 1 (independent claim): Likely to establish the core invention—e.g., a chemical compound with defined structural formulas or a particular crystalline form.
  • Dependent claims: Narrow down features such as specific substitutions, dosages, or formulation variants.
  • Method claims: If present, define a procedure for synthesizing the compound or a therapeutic method involving the compound.

The scope is generally constricted if the claims are highly specific, including detailed structural parameters. Conversely, broader claims, such as "a pharmaceutical composition comprising compound X," increase the scope but may face higher patentability hurdles in Argentina.

Claim Validity Considerations

Argentina’s patent law emphasizes novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The scope of claims must navigate prior art constraints, including existing chemical entities, prior formulations, and known therapeutic uses.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Understanding the patent landscape around AR077635 involves assessing related patents, potential patent families, and existing prior art.

1. Patent Family and Related Applications

It is standard for pharmaceutical patents like AR077635 to belong to a larger patent family, with equivalents filed in other jurisdictions such as Brazil, the US, and Europe. These related patents reinforce patent protection and help prevent circumvention.

A patent family analysis indicates whether the applicant has maintained patent family rights across multiple markets, signaling the strategic importance of this invention regionally and globally.

2. Competitor and Prior Art Landscape

Relevant prior art includes:

  • Existing chemical entities: Known compounds with similar structural frameworks.
  • Previous patents: Prior patents on similar compounds or uses that could pose validity challenges.
  • Public disclosures: Scientific publications and patent documents prior to filing date that anticipate or anticipate and challenge novelty.

The existence of such prior art can narrow the scope of AR077635's claims or threaten their validity. Argentine patent examiners generally refuse patents that lack sufficient inventive step over prior art, especially when the claims read broadly.

3. Patent Examination and Challenges

Argentina’s patent system allows for opposition and post-grant invalidation proceedings, which may have influenced or could influence the scope of AR077635. For example, third-party challenges may target overly broad claims or prior art disclosures invalidating novelty or inventive step.

4. Patent Enforcement and Commercial Implications

The enforceability of AR077635 hinges on its commercial importance, market presence, and the strength of the patent claims. The patent’s lifespan, generally 20 years from filing in Argentina, provides a window for exclusivity until around [date].

Strategic Positioning and Competitive Dynamics

The patent landscape surrounding AR077635 suggests strategic positioning mainly based on:

  • The clinical value of the invention, especially if it involves breakthrough therapy uses or formulations.
  • The breadth of claims, balancing between broad coverage for market leverage and defensibility against invalidation.
  • The grace period and prior art searches are critical prior to patent filing, affecting the scope and potential for future litigation.
  • The potential for patent litigation or challenge by generic competitors post-grant, especially if patent claims are broad.

Legal and Regulatory Implications

Argentina's National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI) oversees patent grants, with examination procedures that include opposition periods (usually six months post-grant). The patent's validity will be scrutinized on actual patentability standards, and narrow amendments or limitations may be made during examination or opposition.

Furthermore, Argentina complies with obligations under the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which influences patent scope and enforcement.

Conclusion

AR077635's scope depends markedly on the specific claims, likely encompassing a novel chemical entity or therapeutic use with claims carefully drafted to maximize protection while avoiding prior art. Its patent landscape is characterized by potential overlaps with existing chemical patents and active competition, emphasizing the importance of strategic claims drafting, enforcement, and vigilance against invalidation challenges.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope primarily hinges on the breadth of its claims; broader claims provide more market leverage but face higher scrutiny.
  • A solid understanding of prior art and patent family positioning is crucial for assessing patent strength and potential vulnerabilities.
  • Continuous monitoring for third-party challenges and patent expirations is vital to maintaining competitive advantage.
  • Patent strategy should balance between obtaining broad protection and ensuring validity under Argentine patent law standards.
  • Leveraging patent exclusivity effectively requires integrating patent rights with regulatory and market strategies.

FAQs

Q1: What is the typical validity period of AR077635 in Argentina?
A: Like standard patents in Argentina, AR077635 generally remains valid for 20 years from the filing date, subject to annual maintenance fees.

Q2: Can broad claims in AR077635 be challenged during patent examination?
A: Yes, Argentine patent examiners rigorously assess claims for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Overly broad claims may face rejection or require narrowing.

Q3: How does the patent landscape influence generic entry in Argentina?
A: Patents like AR077635 can delay generic entry by granting exclusivity. However, validity challenges and patent expirations can lead to market entry options for generics.

Q4: What strategic considerations should patentees focus on in Argentina?
A: Patentees should focus on maximizing claim scope within legal bounds, monitoring prior art, and preparing for potential challenges or oppositions.

Q5: Are there specific regulations in Argentina affecting pharmaceutical patents?
A: Yes, Argentina’s patent law incorporates TRIPS compliance, with additional provincial and procedural regulations managed by INPI affecting patent prosecution, enforcement, and oppositions.


References:

  1. Argentine Patent Law (Law No. 24,481)
  2. INPI Official Guidelines and Examination Standards
  3. TRIPS Agreement: Argentina’s compliance overview
  4. Patent landscape reports for pharmaceutical patents in Latin America
  5. Patent documentation, including patent AR077635 (if accessible)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.