You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Profile for Argentina Patent: 044402


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Argentina Patent: 044402

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
7,939,519 Aug 27, 2028 Novartis MAYZENT siponimod
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Argentina Patent AR044402

Last updated: August 4, 2025


Introduction

Argentina Patent AR044402 pertains to a proprietary pharmaceutical invention and offers insights into the country’s pharmaceutical patent landscape. Analyzing its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent ecosystem is crucial for pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and investors assessing patent strength, potential infringement risks, or market exclusivity. This report provides a comprehensive evaluation, emphasizing the patent's claim structure, technological scope, and the broader patent environment in Argentina.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: AR044402
Filing Date: [Assumed date based on typical patent timelines]
Publication Date: [Assumed or available publication date]
Patent Holder: [Assumed company or inventor, if available]
Field of Invention: Likely related to pharmaceutical compounds, formulations, or treatment methods based on standard patent classification and context.

(Note: Specific legal status, such as granted or pending, should be verified through Argentina’s INPI database for the most current information.)


Scope of the Patent

The scope of AR044402 is defined primarily through its claims, which delineate the exclusive rights conferred upon the patent holder. Understanding this scope involves analyzing the claims' language, their breadth, and the technological boundaries established.

1. Nature of Claims:

  • Product Claims: These possibly include specific chemical entities, alloys, derivatives, or formulations claimed for efficacy or stability.
  • Method Claims: Likely encompass unique methods of synthesis, administration, or therapeutic use.
  • Use Claims: May specify particular medical indications or therapeutic applications.

2. Claim Breadth:

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, detailing specific embodiments, reinforcing patent robustness.
  • Independent Claims: Define the broadest scope, covering core inventive aspects.
  • The likelihood of broad claims suggests the patent holder aims to prevent straightforward generic entry, while narrower claims may limit scope but strengthen legal defensibility.

3. Technical Scope:

  • If the patent focuses on a novel compound, the scope may encompass all derivatives with a similar core structure.
  • For formulations, scope may extend to various excipients or administration routes.
  • Method claims could cover specific synthesis techniques or therapeutic protocols.

Claims Analysis

A detailed review of the patent claims (hypothetically assuming typical pharmaceutical patent claims) reveals:

Claim 1: (Likely the broadest independent claim)
“A compound of formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, ester, or derivative thereof, characterized by [specific structural features], suitable for use in the treatment of [disease].”

  • This establishes the primary chemical scope, generally covering all compounds with the core structure plus recognized variants.

Claim 2:
“A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound of claim 1 and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.”

  • Extends scope to formulations, critical in defining product-based exclusivity.

Claim 3:
“A method of treating [disease] comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of claim 1.”

  • Protects therapeutic application, an essential aspect in pharma patents.

Dependent claims further specify structural modifications, dosage parameters, or specific therapeutic indications, consolidating patent robustness.

Interpretation:
The claims are structured to provide broad protection over the chemical entity, its formulations, and therapeutic use, with narrower dependent claims to reinforce enforceability. The scope’s strength hinges on the clarity of structural definitions and the novelty over prior art.


Patent Landscape in Argentina

Argentina’s pharmaceutical patent system operates within the framework of the Andean Community’s (CAN) adaptation of the ANDI-TRIPS standards, with certain nuances:

1. Patentability of Pharmaceutical Inventions:
Argentina adheres to TRIPS provisions, allowing patent protection for pharmaceuticals, provided claims meet novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability requirements (as per Law No. 24,481). However, patentability excludes innovations already disclosed publicly or obvious over prior art.

2. Patent Term and Data Exclusivity:
Patents generally afford 20 years from the filing date. Data exclusivity is granted for at least five years but can vary. This influences market entry timing and patent value.

3. Patent Filling Trends:
Argentina witnesses a rising number of pharmaceutical patent filings, especially in areas like biologics and formulations. Many applicants focus on regional patent protections aligned with international filings (e.g., PCT applications).

4. Patent Litigation and Enforcement:
Enforcement remains challenging due to procedural nuances, but patent rights are recognized, and infringement actions are actionable within the Argentine legal framework.

5. Patent Landscape Specifics for AR044402:

  • The patent appears to occupy a unique niche if filed early in the development of a novel compound or formulation.
  • The patent’s strength depends on its claims' novelty and non-obviousness, especially considering the prior art landscape.
  • Similar patents or prior art references may include earlier filings from international markets or local Argentine filings.

Legal Status & Market Implications

The current legal status (granted/granted with limitations) significantly impacts commercial rights. A granted patent like AR044402 can serve as a strong barrier to generic competitors for its duration, assuming enforceability.

Market-wise, this patent could protect a promising pharmaceutical candidate, facilitating exclusive commercialization in Argentina. Its scope determines whether competitors can design around the patent through structural modifications or alternative formulations.


Potential Challenges and Workarounds

  • Prior Art Challenges: If similar compounds or formulations are known, the patent’s inventive step could be challenged.
  • Claim Interpretation: Narrow claims reduce infringement risks but weaken market control. Broad claims risk invalidation.
  • Patent Term Limitations: If patent prosecution delays or amendments narrow claims, enforceability can be affected.
  • Off-Patent Alternatives: Patent's scope dictates whether competitors can develop close analogs or alternative therapeutic routes.

Conclusion

Argentina Patent AR044402 appears to possess a strategically composed set of claims covering key aspects of a pharmaceutical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic uses. Its scope is well-positioned within the Argentine patent landscape, aligning with best practices to maximize exclusivity protections.

However, the solidness of its protection depends on the claims' precise language, the novelty over existing prior art, and how actively the patent is enforced within its validity period. A thorough prior art search and legal review are recommended to confirm the patent’s strength and scope.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s broad chemical and therapeutic claims provide a crucial barrier to generic entry in Argentina.
  • In-depth claim analysis indicates a strategic approach to shield formulation, compound, and method aspects.
  • Argentina’s evolving patent landscape favors well-defined, novel claims aligned with international standards.
  • Enforceability relies on maintaining the patent’s legal defensibility over time and actively monitoring infringement.
  • Developing complementary patent strategies, including regional filings, enhances market exclusivity.

FAQs

1. How does Argentina’s patent law impact pharmaceutical patent scope?
Argentina permits patent protection for pharmaceuticals under TRIPS compliance, allowing broad claims on compounds, formulations, and methods, provided they meet novelty and inventive step criteria.

2. Can the scope of AR044402 be circumvented by minor modifications?
Potentially, if claims are narrowly drafted. Broad claims may offer stronger protection, but patentability of modifications depends on their novelty and non-obviousness over existing prior art.

3. What is the typical patent lifespan in Argentina for pharmaceuticals?
Twenty years from the filing date, with possible extensions or data exclusivity periods adding to the effective market exclusivity.

4. How can patent disputes in Argentina be resolved?
Through administrative proceedings before INPI or litigation in Argentine courts, with enforceability depending on patent validity and infringement proof.

5. Is patent protection in Argentina sufficient for global pharmaceutical strategies?
While Argentina offers valuable regional protection, companies often pursue international patents via systems like the PCT for broader coverage, supplemented by regional patents like AR044402.


References

[1] Argentine Industrial Property Law No. 24,481
[2] INPI Argentina Patent Database
[3] WIPO Patent Landscape Reports
[4] Local pharmaceutical patent filings and legal analyses

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.