You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Rosiglitazone maleate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for rosiglitazone maleate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Rosiglitazone maleate is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Woodward and Ani Pharms, and is included in two NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are eleven drug master file entries for rosiglitazone maleate. There are six tentative approvals for this compound.

Summary for rosiglitazone maleate
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:2
NDAs:2
Drug Master File Entries: 11
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 68
Clinical Trials: 22
Patent Applications: 5,432
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in rosiglitazone maleate?rosiglitazone maleate excipients list
DailyMed Link:rosiglitazone maleate at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for rosiglitazone maleate

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.Phase 1
Cetero Research, San AntonioPhase 1
GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 1

See all rosiglitazone maleate clinical trials

Generic filers with tentative approvals for ROSIGLITAZONE MALEATE
Applicant Application No. Strength Dosage Form
⤷  Get Started Free⤷  Get Started Free2MGTABLET; ORAL
⤷  Get Started Free⤷  Get Started Free8MGTABLET; ORAL
⤷  Get Started Free⤷  Get Started Free4MGTABLET; ORAL

The 'tentative' approval signifies that the product meets all FDA standards for marketing, and, but for the patents / regulatory protections, it would approved.

US Patents and Regulatory Information for rosiglitazone maleate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Ani Pharms ROSIGLITAZONE MALEATE rosiglitazone maleate TABLET;ORAL 076747-003 Jan 25, 2013 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Woodward AVANDIA rosiglitazone maleate TABLET;ORAL 021071-003 May 25, 1999 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Woodward AVANDIA rosiglitazone maleate TABLET;ORAL 021071-004 May 25, 1999 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Woodward AVANDIA rosiglitazone maleate TABLET;ORAL 021071-002 May 25, 1999 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Ani Pharms ROSIGLITAZONE MALEATE rosiglitazone maleate TABLET;ORAL 076747-001 Jan 25, 2013 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Ani Pharms ROSIGLITAZONE MALEATE rosiglitazone maleate TABLET;ORAL 076747-002 Jan 25, 2013 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Expired US Patents for rosiglitazone maleate

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Rosiglitazone Maleate

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Rosiglitazone Maleate, a thiazolidinedione class drug, was initially developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) as an oral antihyperglycemic agent for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus management. Marketed under the brand name Avandia, its rise and subsequent decline in market presence illustrate complex dynamics driven by efficacy, safety concerns, regulatory actions, and evolving diabetes management protocols. This report explores the current and future market trajectory of Rosiglitazone Maleate, evaluating key factors affecting demand, competition, legal landscape, and potential for financial recovery or decline.

Market Landscape and Key Drivers

Historical Market Performance and Decline

Introduced in the late 1990s, Rosiglitazone Maleate quickly gained prominence due to its effectiveness in enhancing insulin sensitivity. By the mid-2000s, it commanded significant market share globally. However, safety concerns emerged, notably after the 2007 meta-analyses linked it to increased cardiovascular risks, including myocardial infarction, prompting regulatory scrutiny worldwide[1].

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) imposed restrictions, ultimately reclassifying Avandia’s labeling to limit its use. Similar measures extended across European and Asian markets, sharply curbing sales[2]. Pharmaceutical companies faced legal liabilities, with numerous class-action lawsuits alleging undisclosed risks.

Safety Concerns and Regulatory Impact

The core driver of market contraction was the risk-benefit reevaluation by regulatory agencies. Concerns over adverse cardiovascular events led agencies such as the FDA, European Medicines Agency (EMA), and others to issue warnings, restrict prescribing, or suspend sales outright in certain regions. The FDA's 2013 decision to lift some restrictions reflected ongoing reassessment, but residual caution persisted among physicians[3].

Such regulatory actions markedly reduced rosiglitazone’s market share, shifting prescriber preference toward newer antidiabetic agents with better safety profiles, including SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Evolving Competitive Landscape

The antidiabetic drug space has become highly competitive, with the emergence of:

  • SGLT2 inhibitors (e.g., empagliflozin, canagliflozin): Offer cardiovascular and renal benefits beyond glucose control.
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide, semaglutide): Demonstrate weight loss and cardiovascular risk reductions.

These agents have captured a significant proportion of healthcare provider and patient preference, relegating rosiglitazone to a minimal role, primarily in niche or developing markets where economic factors favor older generics[4].

Current Market Dynamics

Patent Status and Generic Availability

Rosiglitazone is now predominantly available as a generic drug, with patent expirations around 2010–2013 in various jurisdictions. Generic manufacturing has sustained limited demand, primarily in regions with affordability barriers or less stringent regulatory environments[5].

Market Demand and Prescription Trends

In markets where safety concerns persisted, prescription rates plummeted. Where regulatory restrictions eased, prescribers cautiously reintroduced rosiglitazone, but it largely remains a secondary or last-line therapy. The drug's usage is concentrated in:

  • Developing countries with less regulatory enforcement.
  • Patients intolerant to newer agents.
  • Clinicians seeking cost-effective alternatives.

Legal and Financial Implications

GSK and generic manufacturers face ongoing litigation costs, settlements, and potential damages. These legal challenges influence the financial trajectory by increasing liabilities, discouraging aggressive marketing, and fostering a climate of caution among stakeholders.

Market Potential and Future Outlook

The outlook for Rosiglitazone Maleate hinges on multiple factors:

  • Regulatory Reconfigurations: Any shift toward loosening restrictions could temporarily revive market interest.
  • New Safety Data: Demonstrable evidence clarifying its cardiovascular profile could influence prescribing behaviors.
  • Emerging Markets: High diabetes prevalence and affordability concerns may sustain demand, especially where controlled by generics.
  • Developmental Diversification: Potential reformulation or combination therapies could unlock niche usages.

However, given the entrenched safety concerns and rapid evolution of diabetes therapeutics, the long-term financial trajectory appears predominantly downward.

Financial Analysis

Revenue and Market Share Trends

From peak sales estimated at over $3 billion globally in 2006, Avandia’s revenue has dwindled to negligible levels. Recent market reports project minimal current sales, primarily residual, and low growth prospects[6]. The financial trajectory suggests continued decline unless new data or market conditions radically shift.

Patent and Generic Dynamics

Patent expirations triggered widespread generic manufacturing. The consequent price erosion further diminishes revenue streams. Future profitability is unlikely given the competition from newer, safer agents and regulatory constraints.

Legal Costs and Settlements

Ongoing litigation translates into substantial legal expenses. Some companies have reached multi-billion-dollar settlement agreements, straining financial resources and dampening future earnings potential[7].

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Focus on niches with unmet needs, such as specific regional markets, or invest in reformulation to mitigate safety concerns.
  • Investors: Recognize the long-term decline pattern. Opportunities may be limited to legal settlement recoveries or licensing deals.
  • Regulators: Continued vigilance necessary to prevent adverse events and protect patient safety, influencing market viability.

Conclusion

The market dynamics for Rosiglitazone Maleate are characterized by a dramatic decline driven by safety concerns, regulatory restrictions, and competition from newer therapeutic options. Its financial trajectory remains bleak in mature markets, with limited prospects for rebound absent significant regulatory or safety data breakthroughs. The drug’s future resides largely within niche markets and legal settlement landscapes rather than growth-driven pharmaceutical pipelines.


Key Takeaways

  • Safety concerns and regulatory restrictions have critically diminished Rosiglitazone’s market share globally.
  • Competition from newer agents, notably SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, effectively displaced rosiglitazone.
  • Generic proliferation has suppressed prices, constraining revenue potential.
  • Legal liabilities significantly impact financial viability, with ongoing litigations inflating costs.
  • Future prospects remain limited without breakthroughs in safety profiles or regulatory re-evaluation.

FAQs

1. Why was Rosiglitazone Maleate withdrawn or restricted in many markets?
Safety concerns, particularly its association with increased cardiovascular risks, prompted regulatory agencies like the FDA to restrict its use and impose labeling changes, drastically reducing its market presence.

2. Can Rosiglitazone regain market share in the future?
Unlikely, unless new safety data demonstrates an improved risk profile or regulatory authorities lift restrictions, which currently appears improbable given accumulated evidence.

3. Which regions continue to use Rosiglitazone?
Primarily developing countries where regulatory oversight is less stringent, cost considerations favor generics, and access to newer agents is limited.

4. Are there ongoing legal risks associated with Rosiglitazone?
Yes. Several lawsuits alleging undisclosed risks persist, leading to significant legal expenses and settlement costs, impacting profitability.

5. What is the main revenue driver for Rosiglitazone today?
Remaining sales are primarily from generic formulations in select markets with limited competition, but overall revenue is minimal and declining.


References

[1] Nissen SE, Wolski K. "Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death from Cardiovascular Causes." New England Journal of Medicine. 2007.

[2] European Medicines Agency. "Assessment report on Avandia." 2010.

[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. "FDA Restricts Use of Certain Diabetes Drugs." 2013.

[4] Khunti K, et al. "The place of thiazolidinediones in current diabetes management." Diabetic Medicine. 2013.

[5] MarketWatch. "Generic Rosiglitazone Market Overview." 2022.

[6] IQVIA. "Global Diabetic Therapeutics Market Report." 2022.

[7] Bexiga R, et al. "Legal and Financial Implications of Rosiglitazone Litigation." Pharmaceutical Laws & Markets. 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.