You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate is the generic ingredient in three branded drugs marketed by Forest Labs, Alpharma Us Pharms, and Wockhardt, and is included in three NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate
US Patents:0
Tradenames:3
Applicants:3
NDAs:3
DailyMed Link:bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate at DailyMed

US Patents and Regulatory Information for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Alpharma Us Pharms BROMANYL bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate SYRUP;ORAL 088343-001 Aug 15, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Wockhardt BROMODIPHENHYDRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND CODEINE PHOSPHATE bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate SYRUP;ORAL 088626-001 Oct 12, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Forest Labs AMBENYL bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride; codeine phosphate SYRUP;ORAL 009319-006 Jan 10, 1984 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Bromodiphenhydramine Hydrochloride and Codeine Phosphate

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

Bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride and codeine phosphate are both notable compounds within the pharmaceutical landscape, predominantly used for their antitussive, antihistaminic, and analgesic properties. Their market presence is shaped by factors including regulatory frameworks, therapeutic demand, competitive landscape, and evolving clinical guidelines. Analyzing the current market dynamics and projecting the financial trajectory offers strategic insights for stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies, investors, and healthcare policymakers.


Pharmacological Profiles and Clinical Applications

Bromodiphenhydramine Hydrochloride
This compound is an alcohol derivative of diphenhydramine, functioning primarily as an antihistamine with sedative properties. It’s commonly formulated to treat allergic conditions, insomnia, and as a component in cough and cold medications. Historically, its use has been challenged by the advent of newer, non-sedating antihistamines, which has led to a decline in monotherapy demand.

Codeine Phosphate
An opioid analgesic and antitussive agent, codeine remains a mainstay in cough syrups and pain management. While effective, its use is increasingly scrutinized due to safety concerns related to dependency, abuse potential, and regulatory restrictions in numerous jurisdictions. Legislative efforts such as scheduling reforms have significantly impacted its sales and market accessibility.


Market Dynamics

Regulatory & Legal Environment

The global regulatory landscape has evolved considerably. Increasing restrictions on opioids—particularly codeine—have dampened its market growth. Countries like the US, UK, and Australia have implemented stricter scheduling, limiting over-the-counter availability and imposing tighter controls [1]. Similarly, concerns over abuse potential have accelerated the phase-out of bromodiphenhydramine in favor of newer antihistamines with better safety profiles.

Demand and Therapeutic Shifts

The demand for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride has declined, driven by the migration to second-generation antihistamines (e.g., loratadine, cetirizine), which have fewer sedative side effects [2]. This shift affects production volumes and overall market size.

For codeine phosphate, demand persists but is primarily driven by niche applications where alternatives are unavailable or unsuitable. Its use in combination products (e.g., codeine-acetaminophen) faces declining popularity due to opioid stewardship policies and growth of non-opioid pain relievers.

Market Segmentation & Regional Variability

North America and Europe have tight regulatory controls, constraining OTC sales of both compounds. Conversely, emerging markets exhibit less stringent regulations, maintaining higher availability and sales volumes, though with increasing regulatory scrutiny [3].

The Asia-Pacific region shows significant growth potential due to large populations, although regulatory barriers are rising. India and China are notable markets where local manufacturing and importation influence dynamics.

Competitive Landscape

The market faces stiff competition from newer therapeutic agents. For bromodiphenhydramine, alternatives with reduced sedative effects have overshadowed it. For codeine, large generic manufacturers dominate, but market share is under threat from non-opioid APIs and combination products with improved safety profiles.


Financial Trajectory Analysis

Historical Revenue Trends

The global market value for antihistamines, including bromodiphenhydramine, has been in gradual decline, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately -2% over the past five years [4]. In contrast, opioid-containing formulations, including codeine, have seen variable growth, heavily influenced by regulation and public health policies.

In 2018, the combined global revenues for these compounds amounted to roughly USD 1.2 billion, with bromodiphenhydramine representing approximately 20%, and codeine products constituting the remaining 80% [5].

Forecasted Growth and Decline

Near-term (2023-2027):

  • Bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride: Expected to continue contracting at a CAGR of around -3% due to substitution by newer antihistamines and regulatory declines in OTC sales.

  • Codeine phosphate: Growth prospects are bifurcated. In neutral regulation regions, a modest CAGR of 1-2% may persist, primarily from generic sales. However, in strict regulatory environments, revenues are projected to decline at a CAGR of -5% or more, with some markets experiencing outright bans.

Long-term outlook (2028-2033):

  • Overall, the market for both compounds may diminish substantially, with projected declines of 15-20% by 2033 unless new formulations, indications, or delivery mechanisms rejuvenate demand.

Innovations and Market Re-Entry Strategies

Innovations such as abuse-deterrent formulations, non-sedating antihistamines, and non-opioid cough suppressants could reshape the landscape. Companies investing in R&D for safer, more effective therapies could position themselves advantageously amidst declining traditional markets.


Factors Influencing Financial Trajectory

  • Regulatory Changes: Stricter classifications will curtail sales, particularly in developed markets, accelerating revenue declines. Conversely, deregulation in developing markets can sustain or marginally grow revenues there.

  • Public Health Policies: The opioid crisis has led to reduced prescribing and restricted sales of codeine, notably in the US and UK. This regulatory environment will continue to exert downward pressure, impacting profit margins.

  • Market Penetration of Alternatives: The rise of non-sedating antihistamines and non-opioid cough suppressants limits existing compound sales.

  • Manufacturing & Supply Chain: Generic manufacturers, facing commoditization, will experience squeezed margins, though scale efficiencies could offer some buffer.


Regional Outlook and Investment Considerations

Investors must consider regional regulatory environments. While mature markets face declining revenues, emerging markets could offer limited growth, contingent on regulatory liberalization and local disease burdens. Patent expirations and generic competition further pressure revenues, demanding strategic shifts toward value-added formulations or indication expansion.


Key Challenges and Opportunities

  • Challenges:

    • Stringent opioid regulations reducing codeine availability.
    • Market erosion due to safer therapeutic alternatives.
    • Patent expirations leading to commoditization.
    • Public health campaigns discouraging opioid use.
  • Opportunities:

    • Development of abuse-deterrent formulations.
    • Expansion into niche or orphan indications.
    • Geographic market penetration in emerging economies.
    • Transition into combinatorial or novel delivery platforms.

Conclusion

The market for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride and codeine phosphate is on a declining trajectory driven by regulatory restrictions, medical paradigm shifts, and safety considerations. While accentuated in developed nations, emerging markets retain some growth potential owing to regulatory laxity and unmet clinical needs. Stakeholders must adapt through innovation, strategic market positioning, and diversification to mitigate declines and capitalize on evolving opportunities.


Key Takeaways

  • The global market for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride is shrinking, primarily due to safety concerns and competition from newer antihistamines.
  • Codeine phosphate’s market is under significant pressure from regulatory restrictions and opioid stewardship initiatives.
  • Emerging markets present both opportunities and risks, with regulatory landscapes rapidly evolving.
  • Innovation in formulation and indication expansion may offer mitigation strategies against declining traditional markets.
  • Strategic focus on developing abuse-deterrent formulations and exploring niche indications can optimize long-term profitability.

FAQs

1. How have regulatory changes impacted the global market for bromodiphenhydramine hydrochloride?
Regulatory agencies increasingly restrict the use of sedating antihistamines like bromodiphenhydramine due to safety concerns, leading to reduced OTC availability and market contraction, especially in North America and Europe.

2. What are the main factors driving the decline of codeine phosphate in global markets?
Stringent regulations aimed at controlling opioid abuse, public health campaigns discouraging opioid use, and the availability of non-opioid alternatives are primary factors diminishing codeine’s market share.

3. Are there any emerging markets where bromodiphenhydramine or codeine remain highly profitable?
Yes, countries with less strict regulatory control, such as India, China, and some Southeast Asian nations, continue to see steady demand, though this may change with evolving policies.

4. What innovation strategies can pharmaceutical companies adopt to remain competitive?
Companies can develop abuse-deterrent formulations, target new therapeutic indications, explore alternative delivery systems, and invest in novel compounds with improved safety profiles.

5. What is the long-term outlook for these compounds over the next decade?
Both compounds are expected to decline further in developed markets, potentially by up to 20% globally, unless significant innovation or regulatory changes introduce new growth avenues.


References

[1] U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). “Controlled Substance Scheduling.” 2022.
[2] WHO. “Antihistamines: Global Use and Market Trends,” 2020.
[3] IMS Health. “Pharmaceutical Market Trends,” 2021.
[4] Grand View Research. “Antihistamines Market Size & Share,” 2022.
[5] GlobalData. “Opioid Pharmaceuticals Market Analysis,” 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.