Acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride - Generic Drug Details
What are the generic sources for acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride and what is the scope of freedom to operate?
Acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride
is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Gavis Pharms, Watson Labs, and Sanofi Aventis Us, and is included in three NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.Summary for acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride
| US Patents: | 0 |
| Tradenames: | 2 |
| Applicants: | 3 |
| NDAs: | 3 |
| DailyMed Link: | acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride at DailyMed |
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride
US Patents and Regulatory Information for acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | TE | Type | RLD | RS | Patent No. | Patent Expiration | Product | Substance | Delist Req. | Exclusivity Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gavis Pharms | ACETAMINOPHEN AND PENTAZOCINE HYDROCHLORIDE | acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride | TABLET;ORAL | 076202-001 | Aug 2, 2002 | DISCN | No | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Sanofi Aventis Us | TALACEN | acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride | TABLET;ORAL | 018458-001 | Sep 23, 1982 | DISCN | No | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| Watson Labs | ACETAMINOPHEN AND PENTAZOCINE HYDROCHLORIDE | acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride | TABLET;ORAL | 074699-001 | Mar 24, 2000 | DISCN | No | No | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial | ||||
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >TE | >Type | >RLD | >RS | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration | >Product | >Substance | >Delist Req. | >Exclusivity Expiration |
Expired US Patents for acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride
| Applicant | Tradename | Generic Name | Dosage | NDA | Approval Date | Patent No. | Patent Expiration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanofi Aventis Us | TALACEN | acetaminophen; pentazocine hydrochloride | TABLET;ORAL | 018458-001 | Sep 23, 1982 | ⤷ Start Trial | ⤷ Start Trial |
| >Applicant | >Tradename | >Generic Name | >Dosage | >NDA | >Approval Date | >Patent No. | >Patent Expiration |
Acetaminophen and Pentazocine Hydrochloride Market Dynamics, Patent Status, and Financial Trajectory
Acetaminophen and pentazocine hydrochloride is a mature, low-revenue opioid combination marketed primarily as a generic equivalent to Talacen. The product combines 25 mg of pentazocine hydrochloride with 650 mg of acetaminophen per tablet and is indicated for short-term treatment of acute pain when an opioid analgesic is appropriate.[1]
The commercial profile is defined by generic competition, limited prescribing, opioid-control requirements, and the absence of meaningful current patent exclusivity. Public companies generally do not report product-level revenue for this combination. Its financial trajectory is therefore best assessed through regulatory status, manufacturer participation, prescription economics, supply constraints, and competition from other analgesics.
What is acetaminophen and pentazocine hydrochloride?
Acetaminophen and pentazocine hydrochloride is an oral fixed-dose analgesic combining:
| Component | Typical tablet strength | Pharmacologic role |
|---|---|---|
| Pentazocine hydrochloride | Equivalent to 25 mg pentazocine | Opioid analgesic |
| Acetaminophen | 650 mg | Non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic |
The historical branded product is Talacen. The combination was approved in the United States in 1982 under NDA 018707.[1] The approved label covers short-term relief of acute pain that is severe enough to require an opioid analgesic and for which alternative treatments are inadequate.
Pentazocine is a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist. It has activity at kappa opioid receptors and weaker activity at the mu receptor compared with full mu agonists such as oxycodone or hydrocodone. The product remains subject to opioid warnings, including respiratory depression, dependence, withdrawal, misuse, and potentially fatal overdose.[1]
What is the FDA and Orange Book status of acetaminophen and pentazocine?
The product is an FDA-approved prescription drug, but its commercial status is predominantly generic rather than branded.
| Regulatory attribute | Status |
|---|---|
| Reference product | Talacen |
| NDA | 018707 |
| Initial U.S. approval | 1982 |
| Dosage form | Immediate-release tablet |
| Typical strength | Pentazocine 25 mg / acetaminophen 650 mg |
| FDA pathway for competitors | ANDA generic approval |
| Controlled-substance category | Schedule IV pentazocine product |
| Biologic status | Not applicable |
| Current exclusivity profile | No meaningful NCE or market exclusivity remaining |
The FDA Orange Book is the principal source for reference-product, patent-listing, and therapeutic-equivalence information.[2] Talacen’s commercial lifecycle is long past the period in which New Chemical Entity exclusivity, pediatric exclusivity, or brand-led market protection would influence competition.
What patents protect acetaminophen and pentazocine hydrochloride?
No material current patent barrier is associated with the core acetaminophen-pentazocine tablet. The product was introduced more than four decades ago, and any foundational composition or formulation patents would have expired before the current generic market developed.
Patent estate
| Patent category | Current commercial relevance |
|---|---|
| Core combination patent | Expired or no longer commercially blocking |
| Pentazocine active-ingredient patents | Expired |
| Acetaminophen patents | Expired |
| Immediate-release tablet patents | Expired or irrelevant to generic entry |
| Method-of-use patents | No material blocking protection identified |
| Manufacturing patents | No evident barrier to routine tablet manufacture |
| Orange Book-listed patents | No current patent position that materially delays ANDA entry |
The absence of a relevant patent estate means that a prospective manufacturer would not normally need to design around a protected composition, delivery system, or treatment method. The principal barriers are commercial and regulatory rather than intellectual property-based.
When does acetaminophen and pentazocine lose exclusivity?
The product lost meaningful exclusivity decades ago. FDA approval in 1982 placed the product well outside the period of modern small-molecule exclusivity protections. Any NCE exclusivity would have expired in the 1980s, while ordinary U.S. patent terms associated with the original product would have expired no later than the early 2000s in the absence of later-filed, enforceable patents.
The relevant market question is no longer when exclusivity ends. It is whether enough prescription volume remains to support manufacturing, distribution, controlled-substance compliance, and inventory management.
How many patents cover acetaminophen and pentazocine?
The practical answer is zero material blocking patents for the standard immediate-release combination. Any historical patent records associated with pentazocine, acetaminophen, or the Talacen product are not expected to prevent current generic production.
This patent profile differs from newer opioid formulations that may have protection covering abuse-deterrent technology, extended-release delivery, or proprietary abuse-resistance mechanisms. Acetaminophen and pentazocine is an older immediate-release tablet with no comparable technology layer.
What generic entry risks exist for acetaminophen and pentazocine?
Generic entry risk is already realized rather than pending. The product is exposed to:
- Multiple-source generic competition.
- Low reimbursement ceilings.
- Pharmacy substitution.
- Wholesaler purchasing concentration.
- Controlled-substance quota constraints.
- Low inventory turnover.
- Potential manufacturer exits.
- Substitution by non-opioid analgesics and other opioids.
A Paragraph IV challenge would have limited strategic value because the relevant product is not dependent on an active patent barrier. ANDA applicants would generally pursue ordinary generic approval rather than use Paragraph IV litigation to accelerate entry.
Paragraph IV and litigation exposure
| Issue | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Active patent challenge | No material challenge expected |
| Paragraph IV value | Low |
| Patent litigation risk | Low |
| ANDA approval risk | Primarily manufacturing, bioequivalence, and supply-related |
| Regulatory delay risk | Greater than patent delay risk |
| Settlement risk | Minimal because no meaningful blocking patent position remains |
The more important litigation risks concern opioid marketing, controlled-substance compliance, labeling, product liability, and alleged failure to manage diversion. Those risks are separate from patent litigation.
What formulations are protected by acetaminophen and pentazocine patents?
The commercial product is an immediate-release tablet. There is no evident active formulation patent protecting an extended-release, abuse-deterrent, transdermal, injectable, or implantable version of the combination.
This limits pricing power. A manufacturer cannot rely on a proprietary delivery system to justify a premium over standard generic tablets. Any product differentiation would likely come from supply reliability, packaging, wholesaler relationships, or contracting rather than formulation exclusivity.
Manufacturing and intellectual-property barriers
Manufacturing requirements are conventional for a solid oral dosage form. The product requires:
- Control of pentazocine content and uniformity.
- Acetaminophen assay and impurity control.
- Tablet compression and dissolution testing.
- Stability testing.
- Controlled-substance security and recordkeeping.
- Compliance with current good manufacturing practice requirements.
Pentazocine procurement and distribution can be more difficult than ordinary noncontrolled analgesics because manufacturers must comply with Drug Enforcement Administration requirements and applicable production quotas.[3] Those obligations may reduce the number of active suppliers even when no patent prevents entry.
What is the competitive landscape for this drug?
Acetaminophen and pentazocine competes in a shrinking segment of the oral acute-pain market.
| Competitor | Competitive position |
|---|---|
| Acetaminophen alone | Preferred for mild or moderate pain without opioid exposure |
| Ibuprofen and other NSAIDs | Strong substitute where anti-inflammatory treatment is appropriate |
| Hydrocodone/acetaminophen | More familiar full-opioid alternative, generally Schedule II |
| Oxycodone/acetaminophen | Higher-potency opioid alternative, generally Schedule II |
| Tramadol/acetaminophen | Alternative combination with different opioid and serotonergic risks |
| Pentazocine/naloxone | Related product designed to reduce injection misuse |
| Codeine/acetaminophen | Older opioid combination with variable metabolism and declining use |
Pentazocine’s Schedule IV status can be commercially advantageous relative to Schedule II products in some prescribing and dispensing contexts. Its mixed agonist-antagonist pharmacology can also limit its use in patients receiving full opioid agonists because of possible precipitated withdrawal or reduced analgesic effect.[1]
The product’s disadvantages include lower familiarity, opioid-related safety concerns, limited clinical differentiation, and competition from non-opioid pain protocols.
What is the financial trajectory of acetaminophen and pentazocine?
The financial trajectory is mature-to-declining, with limited opportunity for branded price expansion.
Revenue profile
No major manufacturer publicly discloses separate revenue for acetaminophen and pentazocine. The combination is generally included within broader generic, hospital, or pain-management revenue categories. Public financial filings therefore cannot support a reliable standalone sales estimate.
The economics are likely characterized by:
- Low unit prices.
- Low absolute revenue per manufacturer.
- High sensitivity to manufacturing interruptions.
- Limited marketing expenditure.
- Contract and wholesaler-driven purchasing.
- Greater profitability during supply shortages than during normal competition.
- Declining or stagnant demand as opioid prescribing becomes more restrictive.
The product can remain commercially viable despite modest prescription volume if only a small number of manufacturers maintain supply. That does not imply strong brand value or durable pricing power. It reflects the economics of a narrow generic market in which supplier exits can temporarily tighten availability.
Revenue exposure by market segment
| Segment | Revenue outlook |
|---|---|
| Branded product | Minimal |
| Retail generic prescriptions | Low and mature |
| Hospital and institutional use | Limited, dependent on formulary preference |
| Specialty or biologic use | None |
| Licensing revenue | No significant public evidence |
| Patent monetization | None expected |
| Shortage-driven upside | Possible but temporary |
Which companies are challenging or supplying the product?
The market is supplied through FDA-approved generic manufacturers and labelers rather than through a single dominant innovator. Manufacturer participation can change as companies discontinue older products, transfer applications, or retain approval without actively marketing the drug.
FDA’s National Drug Code Directory and Drugs@FDA records are the relevant sources for identifying active product listings and application holders.[4] Product-level manufacturer presence should be distinguished from actual commercial supply because an NDC listing does not necessarily establish meaningful market availability.
There is no major publicly disclosed licensing transaction associated with the current generic market. The product lacks the patent or clinical differentiation that typically supports a high-value licensing deal.
What is the generic launch scenario?
A new generic entrant would face no meaningful patent delay. The likely launch scenario would be:
| Launch factor | Expected effect |
|---|---|
| Patent clearance | Favorable |
| FDA approval pathway | ANDA |
| Bioequivalence burden | Standard immediate-release tablet requirements |
| Pricing | Aggressive because of generic competition |
| Market access | Dependent on wholesalers and pharmacy contracts |
| Controlled-substance compliance | Higher than noncontrolled analgesics |
| Commercial differentiation | Limited |
| Long-term margin | Vulnerable to price erosion |
A new entrant could benefit from supply shortages or manufacturer withdrawals, but a durable premium would be difficult to sustain. The product does not offer a protected formulation, a novel indication, or a large untreated patient population.
What is the biosimilar risk for acetaminophen and pentazocine?
There is no biosimilar risk. Acetaminophen and pentazocine is a chemically synthesized small-molecule drug, not a biologic. Competition occurs through generic-drug pathways under Section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act rather than through the biosimilar pathway under the Public Health Service Act.
The relevant competitive risk is generic substitution, not biosimilar entry.
How does acetaminophen and pentazocine compare with Talwin NX?
Talwin NX contains pentazocine and naloxone, while acetaminophen and pentazocine contains acetaminophen.
| Attribute | Acetaminophen/pentazocine | Talwin NX |
|---|---|---|
| Non-opioid component | Acetaminophen | Naloxone |
| Primary design | Analgesic combination | Pentazocine product with naloxone |
| Acetaminophen toxicity concern | Present | Absent |
| Opioid withdrawal interaction | Present | Present |
| Patent profile | Mature and generic | Mature and generic |
| Commercial differentiation | Limited | Greater historical differentiation from naloxone |
Talwin NX was developed with naloxone to reduce misuse through injection. The acetaminophen combination instead adds a conventional non-opioid analgesic, which creates a cumulative acetaminophen exposure issue when patients use other acetaminophen-containing products.
What regulatory risks affect future sales?
FDA opioid labeling emphasizes serious risks associated with addiction, misuse, abuse, respiratory depression, accidental ingestion, and interaction with benzodiazepines or other central nervous system depressants.[5] These risks can reduce prescribing and increase institutional restrictions.
The key regulatory pressures are:
- Opioid prescribing limits.
- State-level controlled-substance requirements.
- Prescription drug monitoring programs.
- DEA manufacturing and distribution controls.
- FDA inspection and current good manufacturing practice compliance.
- Acetaminophen dose-management requirements.
- Product liability and diversion claims.
These pressures are more relevant to future demand than patent expiration.
Key Takeaways
- Acetaminophen and pentazocine hydrochloride is a mature generic opioid combination, historically marketed as Talacen.
- The reference product was approved in the United States in 1982 under NDA 018707.
- No material current patent or regulatory exclusivity barrier is expected to restrict generic entry.
- Paragraph IV litigation and patent settlement risk are low.
- The product has no biosimilar exposure because it is a small-molecule drug.
- Revenue is not publicly reported at the product level and is likely low relative to major opioid combinations.
- Market value depends on supply continuity, controlled-substance compliance, and generic competition.
- The long-term financial trajectory is mature-to-declining, with temporary upside possible during shortages.
- Manufacturing and DEA requirements are more significant barriers than intellectual property.
- Competitive pressure comes from acetaminophen, NSAIDs, hydrocodone/acetaminophen, oxycodone/acetaminophen, tramadol combinations, and pentazocine/naloxone.
FAQs
Is acetaminophen and pentazocine still available in the United States?
The combination has an established FDA approval and may be available through generic product listings, although commercial availability can vary by manufacturer, wholesaler, and controlled-substance supply conditions.
Is pentazocine with acetaminophen a Schedule II opioid?
No. Pentazocine products are federally classified as Schedule IV controlled substances, although state requirements and product-specific handling obligations still apply.[3]
Can a company obtain a new patent on a pentazocine and acetaminophen tablet?
A company could seek a patent for a genuinely novel formulation, manufacturing process, or delivery system. A routine immediate-release tablet would face substantial validity and non-obviousness challenges and would not recreate the historical exclusivity of Talacen.
Does acetaminophen and pentazocine have abuse-deterrent labeling?
The conventional immediate-release combination should not be treated as an abuse-deterrent opioid formulation unless a specific FDA-approved product label states otherwise.
Is Talacen a high-value licensing opportunity?
The standard Talacen-type combination is unlikely to support a high-value licensing transaction because it has no material patent estate, no biologic exclusivity, and limited product differentiation. A transaction would be more likely to involve manufacturing rights, supply contracts, or a broader generic portfolio.
References
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Talacen: Pentazocine hydrochloride and acetaminophen prescribing information. NDA 018707.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations: Orange Book. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/approved-drug-products-therapeutic-equivalence-evaluations-orange-book
-
U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. (2024). Controlled substance schedules. https://www.dea.gov/drug-information/drug-scheduling
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Drugs@FDA and National Drug Code Directory. https://www.fda.gov/drugs
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Opioid analgesic prescribing information and boxed warning updates. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/information-drug-class/opioid-analgesic-risk-evaluation-and-mitigation-strategy-rem s
More… ↓
