You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

PROPYLIODONE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for propyliodone and what is the scope of patent protection?

Propyliodone is the generic ingredient in two branded drugs marketed by Glaxosmithkline and is included in one NDA. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Summary for PROPYLIODONE
US Patents:0
Tradenames:2
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 37
DailyMed Link:PROPYLIODONE at DailyMed
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for PROPYLIODONE
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for PROPYLIODONE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for PROPYLIODONE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Glaxosmithkline DIONOSIL OILY propyliodone SUSPENSION;INTRATRACHEAL 009309-002 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline DIONOSIL AQUEOUS propyliodone SUSPENSION;INTRATRACHEAL 009309-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for the Pharmaceutical Drug: Propylthiouracil (PTU)

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Propylthiouracil (PTU), known chemically as 6-methylthiouracil, is an antithyroid medication primarily used to treat hyperthyroidism, including Graves' disease and multinodular toxic goiter. Although it has been a foundational drug for decades, its market dynamics and financial trajectory are influenced by evolving medical guidelines, safety profiles, regulatory decisions, and competitive landscape. This analysis explores these aspects, providing a comprehensive insight into PTU's current and future market positioning.


Market Presence and Historical Context

PTU has long served as a second-line therapy for hyperthyroidism, alongside methimazole and other treatments such as radioactive iodine and surgery. Its mechanism involves inhibiting thyroid hormone synthesis by blocking the coupling of iodide to tyrosine residues in thyroglobulin, thus reducing circulating thyroid hormone levels.

Historically, PTU gained prominence in cases of pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, due to methimazole's teratogenic risks. However, recent shifts in prescribing behaviors are due to safety concerns, which substantially impact its market standing.


Regulatory and Safety Considerations

Black Box Warning and Safety Concerns

In 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning for PTU, citing risks of severe liver injury and acute liver failure, which can be fatal. The warning prompts clinicians to reserve PTU for specific scenarios, such as thyroid storm or intolerance to methimazole, especially in pregnant women during early gestation.

Similarly, European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines emphasize cautious use, with limited indications primarily for pregnant patients during the first trimester or those intolerant to methimazole.

Clinical Practice Impacts

The safety concerns have led to a marked decline in PTU prescriptions in the U.S. and Europe. Endocrinologists increasingly prefer methimazole, which exhibits a more favorable safety profile, and reserve PTU for niche cases.


Market Dynamics

Competitor Landscape

Methimazole dominates the antithyroid market due to its efficacy, safety, and ease of use. The decline in PTU sales reflects this shift, reinforced by regulatory safety advisories.

Other competitors include:

  • Radioactive iodine therapy
  • Thyroidectomy
  • Emerging biologic agents targeting thyroid autoimmunity

No recent major novel formulations of PTU have entered the market, limiting its growth potential.

Geographic Variations

While the U.S. and Europe have reduced PTU use, in developing regions where access to alternative therapies is limited, PTU remains in use. Countries like India, China, and parts of Southeast Asia continue to prescribe PTU widely, leading to localized market stability or modest growth.

Regulatory Support and Patent Status

PTU is off patent, with existing formulations supplied by generic manufacturers. The absence of patent protections limits investment in innovation. Regulatory authorities’ emphasis on safety profiles further discourages new formulations or label extensions.


Financial Trajectory

Revenue Trends

In mature markets, sales of PTU have declined sharply over the past decade. For instance, in the U.S., prescription data indicates a annual decrease of approximately 20-30%, reflecting clinicians’ shift to methimazole or other interventions.

Global sales are more resilient in regions with limited access to newer therapies, but even these are experiencing gradual erosion due to increasing safety awareness and the availability of alternatives.

Market Valuation and Forecast

Given its diminished use, PTU’s current market valuation is modest. Future revenue streams are expected to remain constrained, with minimal potential for significant growth unless new formulations or indications emerge.

Analysts project a continued downward trajectory unless breakthrough data alters current safety perceptions, which appears unlikely under current regulatory and clinical practices.

Pricing Dynamics

Pricing of PTU remains competitive, driven by generic manufacturing. As demand diminishes, some producers may reduce prices further, although competition generally stabilizes at low levels due to the drug’s commoditized status.


Potential Future Developments

Re-Evaluation of Safety Profiles

Any future research demonstrating improved safety or alternative administration methods could influence market dynamics. This includes the development of PTU delivery systems with reduced hepatotoxic risk or combination therapies.

Regulatory Resolutions

Regulatory agencies may re-assess safety data, potentially leading to label updates, risk mitigation strategies, or even reintroduction under specific guidelines. Such changes could temporarily stabilize or boost PTU’s market presence.

Innovative Applications and Niche Markets

While challenging, niche indications—such as specific patient populations with contraindications to methimazole—could preserve a small segment of PTU demand. However, regulatory approval and clinical acceptance would be prerequisites.


Key Market Factors Impacting Financial Trajectory

Factor Impact Description
Safety Profile Negative Liver toxicity concerns limit use.
Regulatory Actions Restrictive Black box warning reduces prescription volume.
Competitive Alternatives Dominant Methimazole and other therapies overshadow PTU.
Geographic Variability Mixed Demand persists in certain regions.
Innovation & Research Limited Lack of R&D efforts constrains growth prospects.

Conclusion

The market dynamics for propylthiouracil are characterized by significant decline driven by safety concerns and regulatory restrictions, particularly in developed economies. Its financial trajectory is expected to remain subdued, with limited growth prospects. However, regional nuances may sustain niche markets, especially where access to modern therapies is constrained.

Critical to future prospects will be safety profile improvements, regulatory re-evaluation, and targeted clinical use. Manufacturers and stakeholders should monitor regulatory landscapes and emerging clinical evidence to adapt strategies accordingly.


Key Takeaways

  • PTU’s declining global market stems from safety concerns, notably hepatotoxicity leading to black box warnings.
  • Regulatory restrictions significantly curtail use in developed markets, favoring methimazole and other therapies.
  • Niche applications in limited regions persist but with modest financial implications.
  • Innovation avenues are minimal, with generic manufacturing dominating the landscape.
  • Future prospects hinge on safety profile improvements or re-evaluation by regulators, which remains uncertain.

FAQs

1. Why has the use of propylthiouracil declined significantly in recent years?
The decline resulted from the FDA’s black box warning due to the risk of severe liver injury, prompting clinicians to favor methimazole, which exhibits a safer profile for most patients.

2. In which regions does propylthiouracil still maintain significant market share?
It retains usage primarily in developing countries like India and parts of Southeast Asia, where access to and affordability of newer therapies are limited.

3. Could new formulations or safety improvements revival propylthiouracil’s market?
While theoretically possible, no current developments suggest imminent re-emergence. Extensive research and regulatory approval would be required, making revival unlikely in the near term.

4. How do regulatory bodies influence propylthiouracil’s market trajectory?
Regulatory agencies’ safety decisions, including warnings and restrictions, directly impact prescribing habits, sales volume, and overall market viability.

5. What is the outlook for investors or companies holding patent rights or manufacturing rights for PTU?
Given the drug’s off-patent status and declining demand, prospects for significant revenue generation are limited unless innovation or new indications emerge, which currently appears improbable.


Sources

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Risks of Liver Injury with Propylthiouracil (PTU). 2009.
[2] European Medicines Agency. Assessment Report: Propylthiouracil. 2015.
[3] American Thyroid Association. Guidelines for the Treatment of Hyperthyroidism. 2016.
[4] Prescription Drug Market Reports, IQVIA. 2022.
[5] Global Pharmaceutical Market Analysis, GlobalData. 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.