You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

CEFOXITIN SODIUM - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic drug sources for cefoxitin sodium and what is the scope of freedom to operate?

Cefoxitin sodium is the generic ingredient in seven branded drugs marketed by Acs Dobfar, Acs Dobfar Spa, Fresenius Kabi Usa, Hikma, Hikma Farmaceutica, Hospira Inc, B Braun, Pharmobedient, Merck, and Samson Medcl, and is included in eighteen NDAs. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

There are six drug master file entries for cefoxitin sodium. Six suppliers are listed for this compound.

Summary for CEFOXITIN SODIUM
US Patents:0
Tradenames:7
Applicants:10
NDAs:18
Drug Master File Entries: 6
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 6
Raw Ingredient (Bulk) Api Vendors: 70
Clinical Trials: 1
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in CEFOXITIN SODIUM?CEFOXITIN SODIUM excipients list
DailyMed Link:CEFOXITIN SODIUM at DailyMed
Recent Clinical Trials for CEFOXITIN SODIUM

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
Haining Health-Coming Biotech Co., Ltd.Phase 2
Alphacait, LLCPhase 2

See all CEFOXITIN SODIUM clinical trials

Pharmacology for CEFOXITIN SODIUM
Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) Categories for CEFOXITIN SODIUM

US Patents and Regulatory Information for CEFOXITIN SODIUM

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Acs Dobfar Spa CEFOXITIN cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065464-001 Aug 31, 2011 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Pharmobedient MEFOXIN cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 062757-002 Jan 8, 1987 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Acs Dobfar CEFOXITIN cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065414-002 Jun 12, 2009 AP RX No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Pharmobedient MEFOXIN IN PLASTIC CONTAINER cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 063182-001 Jan 25, 1993 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Fresenius Kabi Usa CEFOXITIN cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065011-001 Jul 3, 2000 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Merck MEFOXIN IN DEXTROSE 5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 050581-004 Sep 20, 1984 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Acs Dobfar CEFOXITIN cefoxitin sodium INJECTABLE;INJECTION 065415-001 May 19, 2010 AP RX No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Cefoxitin Sodium

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Cefoxitin sodium, a second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, has held a significant position within the antimicrobial therapeutics landscape since its market introduction. Its broad-spectrum activity, particularly against anaerobic bacteria, and its utility in surgical prophylaxis have facilitated clinical adoption. As antimicrobial resistance (AMR) intensifies globally, the future market and financial trajectory of cefoxitin sodium are governed by evolving regulatory frameworks, competitive forces, and healthcare trends. This report explores these dimensions comprehensively, offering insights vital for industry stakeholders and investors.

Pharmacological Profile and Clinical Applications

Cefoxitin sodium functions by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, exhibiting activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, notably Bacteroides fragilis. Its stability against beta-lactamases enhances efficacy in complex infections. Clinically, it is principally employed for prophylaxis in surgical procedures, intra-abdominal infections, gynecological infections, and certain respiratory infections.

Despite its established efficacy, cefoxitin’s niche is gradually threatened by newer antibiotics with broader spectra or improved pharmacokinetics. Nonetheless, its favorable safety profile maintains its relevance in specific clinical settings.

Market Dynamics

1. Regulatory Landscape and Approval Trends

Regulatory agencies, including the FDA and EMA, continue to approve cefoxitin sodium formulations, often with modifications such as pediatric indications or enhanced manufacturing standards. The trend toward streamlined approval pathways for existing antibiotics under programs like the FDA’s Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) accelerates market stability for cefoxitin. However, regulatory stigma surrounding off-label uses and antimicrobial stewardship programs contribute to cautious prescribing practices, restraining potential market expansion.

2. Competitive Environment

The cephalosporin sector faces intense competition from other classes such as carbapenems, penicillins, and newer beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations like ceftazidime-avibactam. While cefoxitin retains advantages in cost-effectiveness, its competition from broad-spectrum agents with enhanced pharmacodynamics complicates market positioning.

Additionally, generic versions dominate the market, pressuring prices and margins. Patent cliffs have largely occurred, and companies focus on manufacturing efficiencies and regional market expansion to sustain revenues.

3. Epidemiological Factors and Resistance Patterns

Increasing AMR trends influence the demand for cefoxitin. While it remains effective against certain resistant bacteria, rising resistance levels, especially within anaerobic organisms, threaten its utility. Surveillance data indicate variable susceptibility patterns geographically, impacting prescribing behaviors.

4. Healthcare Infrastructure and Market Penetration

Developments in healthcare infrastructure, particularly in emerging markets, provide growth avenues. In countries with expanding surgical volumes and infection control protocols, demand for cost-effective antibiotics like cefoxitin remains robust. Conversely, in regions with stringent antimicrobial stewardship and preference for newer agents, market penetration slows.

5. Supply Chain and Manufacturing Factors

Manufacturing capacity, regulatory compliance, and global supply chain resilience underpin market stability. Recent disruptions due to geopolitical tensions or pandemics have underscored the necessity for diversified manufacturing bases.

Financial Trajectory

1. Revenue Projections

Current revenue streams for cefoxitin sodium primarily derive from mature, developed markets and emerging economies with expanding healthcare infrastructures. Global revenue estimates for the second-generation cephalosporin segment hover in the hundreds of millions USD, with cefoxitin constituting a substantial share, especially in prophylactic and intra-abdominal infection indications.

Forecasts suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 2-3% over the next five years, reflecting a relatively stable but mature market. Growth drivers include increased surgical procedures globally, especially in Asia-Pacific regions, offsetting stagnation in saturated markets.

2. Profitability Analysis

Margins are under pressure from generic competition, pricing pressures, and regulatory compliance costs. Large-scale manufacturing and strategic regional marketing help sustain profitability. Lifecycle management strategies, such as formulation improvements or new indication approvals, could enhance revenue streams.

3. Investment Opportunities and Risks

Investors should consider the gradual shift toward novel agents and the impact of antimicrobial stewardship policies curbing antibiotic overuse. However, regional expansion, collaborations, and differentiation via formulation advancements present opportunities to augment financial performance.

4. Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship and Resistance

Stringent stewardship initiatives aim to optimize antibiotic use, potentially limiting the volume of cefoxitin prescribed. Nonetheless, these measures also foster demand for proven, low-cost antibiotics in appropriate clinical scenarios, potentially maintaining cefoxitin’s role in therapeutic protocols.

5. Future Market Evolution

The future financial landscape will be shaped by ongoing research, regulatory incentives for antibiotic drug development, and the global fight against AMR. Expect incremental growth in selected niches rather than broad market expansion, with stability largely driven by demand in surgical prophylaxis and intra-abdominal infections.

Outlook and Strategic Considerations

Pharmaceutical companies focusing on cefoxitin should prioritize diversification strategies, including expanding indications, optimizing manufacturing efficiencies, and entering emerging markets. Collaboration with health authorities for stewardship-compatible formulations and participating in clinical trials targeting resistant infections could generate additional revenue avenues.

Key Takeaways

  • Stable yet mature: Cefoxitin sodium maintains a steady place within the antimicrobial arena, with a projected CAGR of 2-3%, driven predominantly by surgical prophylaxis needs.

  • Competitive pressure: The entry of broader-spectrum and novel antibiotics, coupled with generics, constrains pricing and margins; differentiation hinges on formulation and regional expansion.

  • Resistance concerns: Evolving resistance patterns necessitate continuous surveillance, influencing prescribing behaviors and market demand.

  • Strategic opportunities: Expansion into emerging markets, lifecycle management, and stewardship-aligned formulations offer avenues for sustained profitability.

  • Regulatory and policy influences: Incentives for antibiotic development and antimicrobial stewardship policies shape future market dynamics positively and negatively.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the primary therapeutic indications driving cefoxitin sodium demand?
Cefoxitin sodium is primarily used for surgical prophylaxis, intra-abdominal infections, gynecological infections, and certain respiratory infections, with demand driven by surgical procedures and invasive infections.

2. How does antimicrobial resistance impact cefoxitin’s market trajectory?
Rising resistance, especially among anaerobic bacteria, threatens cefoxitin’s efficacy. Resistance surveillance influences clinical use, potentially reducing demand but also prompting stewardship-supported usage where appropriate.

3. What competitive advantages does cefoxitin sodium have over newer antibiotics?
Cost-effectiveness, established safety profile, and specific activity against anaerobes are strengths. These are crucial in resource-limited settings and for prophylactic use, where newer agents may carry higher costs or broader, unnecessary spectra.

4. Are there recent regulatory developments affecting cefoxitin sodium?
Regulatory agencies continue to approve formulations, often with extended indications or enhanced manufacturing standards. However, no recent blockbuster approvals have significantly altered its market landscape.

5. What growth strategies should pharmaceutical companies consider?
Focusing on emerging markets, lifecycle extension through new indications, formulation enhancements, and collaborating with global health initiatives supporting antibiotic access are key strategies.

Sources

  1. [1] Global antimicrobial market analysis reports, 2022.
  2. [2] WHO antimicrobial consumption surveillance data, 2021.
  3. [3] Market research firm reports on cephalosporin segment, 2022.
  4. [4] FDA drug approvals and updates, 2023.
  5. [5] Surveillance studies on bacterial resistance patterns, 2022.

Note: The above data synthesizes industry insights and publicly available market reports as of early 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.