You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE - Generic Drug Details


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What are the generic sources for arimoclomol citrate and what is the scope of patent protection?

Arimoclomol citrate is the generic ingredient in one branded drug marketed by Zevra Denmark and is included in one NDA. There are three patents protecting this compound. Additional information is available in the individual branded drug profile pages.

Arimoclomol citrate has forty-four patent family members in seventeen countries.

One supplier is listed for this compound.

Summary for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE
International Patents:44
US Patents:3
Tradenames:1
Applicants:1
NDAs:1
Finished Product Suppliers / Packagers: 1
Clinical Trials: 2
Patent Applications: 36
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE
What excipients (inactive ingredients) are in ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE?ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE excipients list
DailyMed Link:ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE at DailyMed
DrugPatentWatch® Estimated Loss of Exclusivity (LOE) Date for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE
Generic Entry Date for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE*:
Constraining patent/regulatory exclusivity:
TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF NIEMANN-PICK DISEASE TYPE C (NPC) IN ADULT AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS 2 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER
Dosage:
CAPSULE;ORAL

*The generic entry opportunity date is the latter of the last compound-claiming patent and the last regulatory exclusivity protection. Many factors can influence early or later generic entry. This date is provided as a rough estimate of generic entry potential and should not be used as an independent source.

Recent Clinical Trials for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE

Identify potential brand extensions & 505(b)(2) entrants

SponsorPhase
OrphazymePhase 3

See all ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE clinical trials

Pharmacology for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classes for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE

US Patents and Regulatory Information for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Zevra Denmark MIPLYFFA arimoclomol citrate CAPSULE;ORAL 214927-004 Sep 20, 2024 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Zevra Denmark MIPLYFFA arimoclomol citrate CAPSULE;ORAL 214927-002 Sep 20, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Zevra Denmark MIPLYFFA arimoclomol citrate CAPSULE;ORAL 214927-001 Sep 20, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Zevra Denmark MIPLYFFA arimoclomol citrate CAPSULE;ORAL 214927-003 Sep 20, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Zevra Denmark MIPLYFFA arimoclomol citrate CAPSULE;ORAL 214927-002 Sep 20, 2024 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

International Patents for ARIMOCLOMOL CITRATE

Country Patent Number Title Estimated Expiration
Israel 235342 שימוש ב-hsp70 כמווסת פעילות אנזימטית (Use of hsp70 as a regulator of enzymatic activity) ⤷  Start Trial
Denmark 3578195 ⤷  Start Trial
Russian Federation 2521672 ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ HSP70 В КАЧЕСТВЕ РЕГУЛЯТОРА ФЕРМЕНТАТИВНОЙ АКТИВНОСТИ (APPLICATION OF HSP70 AS REGULATOR OF ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY) ⤷  Start Trial
Japan 5616336 ⤷  Start Trial
Hong Kong 1153678 USE OF HSP70 AS A REGULATOR OF ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY HSP70 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Title >Estimated Expiration

Market Dynamics and Financial Trajectory for Arimoclomol Citrate

Last updated: February 20, 2026

What is the current market position of arimoclomol citrate?

Arimoclomol citrate is an investigational drug developed by Orphazyme, targeting rare neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders such as Niemann-Pick disease type C (NPC), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and other protein misfolding diseases. Its regulatory and commercial status remains evolving.

How does the development pipeline influence its market prospects?

The drug has completed Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials. The most advanced data relates to its use in NPC, with some promising biomarker and symptomatic outcomes.

  • Phase 3 trials for NPC concluded in 2022; results were mixed, with some efficacy signals.
  • FDA and EMA submissions are pending or recently submitted, with a decision anticipated within 12-24 months.

The clinical development pipeline positions arimoclomol citrate as a candidate for orphan drug designation, offering market exclusivity rights upon approval.

What are the key market drivers?

  • Orphan disease designation: Grants regulatory and commercial incentives, including market exclusivity, tax credits, and fee waivers.
  • Unmet medical need: NPC and ALS currently lack fully effective treatments, driving demand for new therapies.
  • Regulatory momentum: Orphazyme has submitted NDA/MAA dossiers based on positive clinical outcomes, but final approvals depend on regulatory review results.
  • Pricing potential: Orphan drugs can command high prices; estimates for similar therapies range from $150,000 to $500,000 annually per patient.

What are the main barriers impacting market potential?

  • Regulatory uncertainty: Pending reviews create unpredictability. Negative decisions would halt further commercialization.
  • Market size limitations: NPC affects an estimated 1,000-2,000 patients worldwide; ALS has a broader prevalence (~30,000 in the US), but the drug’s efficacy profile may limit its scope.
  • Competitive landscape: Other therapies, such as Miglustat (Zavesca) and emerging gene therapies, could limit market share.
  • Manufacturing complexities: The drug’s citrate formulation and supply chain challenges could impact production capacity and costs.

How does financial outlook vary under different scenarios?

Scenario Clinical/Regulatory Outcome Revenue Potential Market Access Timing Key Financial Drivers
Best-case Regulatory approval based on Phase 3 data; positive reimbursement decisions $200M-$300M annually (peak) 12-24 months post-approval High pricing; orphan exclusivity; expanding indications
Base-case Approval with partial efficacy; cautious reimbursement; limited market penetration $50M-$100M annually 24-36 months post-approval Moderate pricing; restricted indications
Worst-case Regulatory rejection; market withdrawal; competitor encroachment <$10M annually N/A Loss of market opportunity

What are revenue estimates based on comparable orphan drugs?

  • Nanolucan (Nusinersen, Spinraza): Peak revenues >$1B with initial pricing at approximately $750,000 per treatment course.
  • Vyondys 53 (Golodirsen): ~ $300,000 annually per patient.
  • Implication: If arimoclomol citrate gains approval for NPC, pricing may range between $150,000-$500,000 annually, depending on the indications and reimbursement landscape.

How will market entry and commercialization evolve?

  • Regulatory approval hinges on further clinical data and review outcomes.
  • Reimbursement negotiations are pivotal, with payers requiring health economic data.
  • Manufacturing capacity must scale to meet potential demand, with costs impacting profitability margins.
  • Partnerships with licensing and distribution firms could accelerate market penetration in key territories.

What are key takeaways?

  • Arimoclomol citrate remains an investigational orphan drug with pending regulatory decisions.
  • Its commercial future depends on clinical efficacy signals, approval timing, and reimbursement outcomes.
  • Market size is limited primarily to rare disease patients, but high pricing could generate substantial revenues if approved.
  • Regulatory, manufacturing, and competitive hurdles could limit faster market access.
  • Financial projections span from minimal impact to multi-hundred million-dollar revenues, contingent on multiple development and market factors.

FAQs

  1. When is arimoclomol citrate expected to receive regulatory approval?
    Final decisions are expected within 12-24 months following submission, depending on agency review times and data interpretation.

  2. What are the main indications under development?
    Niemann-Pick disease type C, ALS, and potentially other protein-folding disorders.

  3. What pricing strategy could optimize commercial success?
    Pricing in orphan indications typically ranges from $150,000 to $500,000 annually; reimbursement negotiations are critical.

  4. Are there major competitors?
    Existing therapies for NPC include Miglustat (Zavesca). Gene therapy approaches are emerging but not yet widely available for NPC.

  5. What factors could delay market entry?
    Regulatory delays, negative clinical trial outcomes, manufacturing issues, or unfavorable reimbursement decisions.


Citations

[1] Orphazyme. (2022). Clinical trial results. Orphazyme Investor Update.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Orphan drug designation criteria.
[3] European Medicines Agency. (2023). Regulatory review processes for orphan medicines.
[4] Market ThinkTank. (2022). Global orphan drug market size and forecasts.
[5] EvaluatePharma. (2022). Orphan drug valuation and pricing.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.