Share This Page
Drugs Containing Excipient (Inactive Ingredient) CROSPOVIDONE
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Branded drugs containing CROSPOVIDONE excipient, and estimated key patent expiration / generic entry dates
| Company | Tradename | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient | Potential Generic Entry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Company | ZYPREXA | olanzapine | 0002-4112 | CROSPOVIDONE | |
| Eli Lilly and Company | FOUNDAYO | orforglipron | 0002-4178 | CROSPOVIDONE | 2031-04-01 |
| Eli Lilly and Company | EVISTA | raloxifene hydrochloride | 0002-4184 | CROSPOVIDONE | |
| ER Squibb & Sons LLC | BARACLUDE | entecavir | 0003-1611 | CROSPOVIDONE | |
| ER Squibb & Sons LLC | REYATAZ | atazanavir | 0003-3624 | CROSPOVIDONE | |
| ER Squibb & Sons LLC | EVOTAZ | atazanavir and cobicistat | 0003-3641 | CROSPOVIDONE | 2029-09-03 |
| >Company | >Tradename | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient | >Potential Generic Entry |
Generic drugs containing CROSPOVIDONE excipient
| Company | Ingredient | NDC | Excipient |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Company | olanzapine | 0002-4112 | CROSPOVIDONE |
| Eli Lilly and Company | orforglipron | 0002-4178 | CROSPOVIDONE |
| Eli Lilly and Company | raloxifene hydrochloride | 0002-4184 | CROSPOVIDONE |
| ER Squibb & Sons LLC | entecavir | 0003-1611 | CROSPOVIDONE |
| ER Squibb & Sons LLC | atazanavir | 0003-3624 | CROSPOVIDONE |
| ER Squibb & Sons LLC | atazanavir and cobicistat | 0003-3641 | CROSPOVIDONE |
| >Company | >Ingredient | >NDC | >Excipient |
Crospovidone Market Dynamics, Financial Trajectory, Manufacturers, and Regulatory Outlook
Crospovidone is a mature, non-therapeutic pharmaceutical excipient used primarily as a superdisintegrant in immediate-release tablets and hard capsules. Demand is tied to generic medicines, over-the-counter products, orally disintegrating tablets, and emerging direct-compression formulations. The market has stable volume characteristics but limited public financial transparency because manufacturers generally report crospovidone within broader pharmaceutical excipient or life-science segments.
The commercial outlook is positive but moderate. Volume growth should track global solid-dose pharmaceutical production, while pricing depends on grade, particle-size distribution, regulatory qualification, supply reliability, and manufacturing location. The strongest barriers are customer qualification, compendial compliance, process consistency, and validated supply chains rather than active composition patents.
What is crospovidone and how is it used?
Crospovidone is a crosslinked form of polyvinylpyrrolidone, also known as crosslinked PVP or crospovidone. It is insoluble in water but rapidly absorbs liquid and swells, allowing tablets to break apart after administration.
The principal uses are:
- Superdisintegrant in immediate-release tablets
- Disintegration aid in hard capsules
- Component of orally disintegrating tablets
- Processing aid in direct-compression formulations
- Carrier or matrix component in selected solid-dose drug-delivery systems
Crospovidone is used at relatively low concentrations, commonly in the approximate range of 2% to 5% of a tablet formulation, although actual levels vary by drug substance, compression force, tablet hardness, particle size, and formulation design.
Manufacturers sell multiple grades differentiated by particle-size distribution, bulk density, porosity, water uptake, and flow properties. These differences affect tablet disintegration, dissolution, compression behavior, and manufacturability.
How large is the crospovidone market?
Public sources do not provide a standardized, audited global revenue figure for crospovidone alone. Commercial market reports often combine crospovidone with other superdisintegrants or with the wider pharmaceutical excipients market. Their estimates differ because of inconsistent definitions, geographic coverage, and treatment of captive production.
The market can be assessed through demand drivers rather than a single reliable figure:
| Demand driver | Effect on crospovidone demand |
|---|---|
| Generic tablet production | Strong positive |
| Branded immediate-release products | Stable positive |
| Orally disintegrating tablets | Positive, but formulation-specific |
| Biologics and injectable drugs | Limited direct effect |
| Softgels and liquid dosage forms | Limited effect |
| Direct compression | Positive |
| Wet granulation | Positive, subject to formulation design |
| Tablet miniaturization | Positive where rapid disintegration is required |
| Regional manufacturing expansion | Positive |
| Substitution by croscarmellose sodium or sodium starch glycolate | Competitive pressure |
Crospovidone is a volume-driven excipient. It does not benefit from the same unit-price economics as an active pharmaceutical ingredient or a patented drug. Financial performance depends on recurring customer qualification, plant utilization, product mix, and supply contracts.
Which companies manufacture crospovidone?
The principal global and regional suppliers include Ashland, BASF, JRS Pharma, Boai NKY Pharmaceuticals, and other Asian manufacturers. Product names and manufacturing entities can change through acquisitions, divestitures, or regional distribution agreements.
| Company | Representative product family or market position | Commercial relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Ashland | Polyplasdone crospovidone | Major global excipient supplier with strong regulatory support |
| BASF | Kollidon CL and related PVP products | Integrated PVP portfolio and global pharmaceutical customer base |
| JRS Pharma | VIVAPHARM crospovidone products | Broad excipient portfolio and strong formulation support |
| Boai NKY Pharmaceuticals | Pharmaceutical PVP and crospovidone products | Important Asian manufacturing and export supplier |
| Regional manufacturers | Multiple generic crospovidone grades | Price competition and regional supply diversification |
Ashland’s Polyplasdone range and BASF’s Kollidon CL range are among the best-known branded products. JRS Pharma competes through excipient breadth, technical support, and formulation services. Asian suppliers compete on price, capacity, and proximity to customers in China, India, and other manufacturing markets.
The competitive landscape is fragmented below the leading multinational suppliers. Pharmaceutical customers often maintain dual sourcing, but switching requires comparative testing, supplier audits, regulatory documentation, and process validation.
How does crospovidone compare with other superdisintegrants?
Crospovidone competes mainly with croscarmellose sodium and sodium starch glycolate.
| Attribute | Crospovidone | Croscarmellose sodium | Sodium starch glycolate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical basis | Crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone | Crosslinked cellulose derivative | Crosslinked modified starch |
| Solubility behavior | Insoluble, rapid swelling and wicking | Insoluble, swelling and wicking | Insoluble, high swelling |
| Typical use | Immediate-release tablets and capsules | Immediate-release tablets | Immediate-release tablets |
| Sensitivity to compression | Can retain strong performance under suitable conditions | Formulation-dependent | Formulation-dependent |
| Common selection factor | Rapid disintegration and compatibility | Cost, established performance | High swelling and cost |
| Main commercial risk | Supplier qualification and price | Substitution in standard formulations | Substitution in standard formulations |
The choice is formulation-specific. Crospovidone can be preferred where rapid liquid uptake, low gelling tendency, or favorable performance under direct compression is required. Croscarmellose sodium and sodium starch glycolate remain credible substitutes in many standard tablet formulations.
Substitution is easier for new products than for approved commercial products. For an established medicine, changing the disintegrant may require comparative dissolution, stability work, process validation, and a regulatory filing depending on the jurisdiction and scale of the change.
What are the main market dynamics affecting crospovidone?
Generic drug expansion
Generic tablets represent the largest structural demand base. Crospovidone is used in products containing analgesics, antihypertensives, anti-infectives, central nervous system drugs, gastrointestinal medicines, and many other active ingredients.
Generic manufacturers are under sustained cost pressure. This favors qualified lower-cost suppliers, but excipient cost is usually a small part of total tablet cost. A low-priced alternative cannot displace an incumbent easily if it creates production variability or regulatory work.
Growth in direct compression
Direct compression can reduce processing steps and improve manufacturing efficiency. Crospovidone grades with suitable flow, compressibility, and particle engineering can benefit from this trend.
Excipient suppliers compete on functional performance, not only chemical identity. Technical data on disintegration time, dissolution, compactibility, moisture behavior, and compatibility can support premium pricing.
Orally disintegrating tablets
Orally disintegrating tablets require fast breakup and acceptable mouthfeel. Crospovidone may be used in these formulations, although taste masking, tablet strength, porosity, and manufacturing method determine the final excipient selection.
This segment is commercially attractive but smaller than the broad immediate-release tablet market. It is unlikely to transform total crospovidone demand without wider adoption of orally disintegrating dosage forms.
Supply-chain localization
Pharmaceutical manufacturers increasingly seek regional or dual sources for critical excipients. Crospovidone benefits from this trend because qualification of an alternative supplier can take months or years.
Regional production can reduce freight exposure and geopolitical risk. It also increases price competition, particularly where local suppliers meet relevant compendial and quality requirements.
Raw-material exposure
Crospovidone production depends on polyvinylpyrrolidone chemistry and related upstream raw materials. Costs can be affected by energy, labor, packaging, transport, and chemical-feedstock pricing. Because excipient contracts often have annual or negotiated pricing, manufacturers may experience margin pressure when input costs rise faster than selling prices.
What is the financial trajectory for crospovidone suppliers?
Crospovidone revenue is generally not reported as a separate line item. The most useful public indicators are the pharmaceutical excipient segment results of major suppliers.
| Financial factor | Expected effect |
|---|---|
| Higher generic tablet volumes | Supports revenue growth |
| Mix shift toward premium grades | Supports gross margin |
| Chinese and Indian capacity expansion | Pressures price |
| Customer inventory destocking | Creates short-term volatility |
| Energy and chemical-cost inflation | Pressures margin |
| Long-term supply contracts | Improves revenue visibility |
| Regulatory support and documentation | Supports customer retention |
| Plant utilization | Strong effect on operating leverage |
Ashland reports within broader life-science and specialty-materials categories rather than separately disclosing Polyplasdone revenue. BASF similarly reports pharmaceutical excipients within wider nutrition, care chemicals, and related business structures. JRS Pharma is privately held and does not provide the same level of public financial detail as a listed company.
The likely financial trajectory is therefore:
- Low-to-mid single-digit volume growth in established markets.
- Faster growth in selected emerging markets with expanding oral-solid manufacturing.
- Stable but competitive pricing for standard grades.
- Better margins for premium grades with differentiated functionality and regulatory support.
- Periodic revenue volatility from distributor destocking and pharmaceutical customer inventory management.
The product is unlikely to generate drug-like margins because it has no protected clinical indication, no reimbursement leverage, and extensive substitution options. Its financial value comes from repeat demand, qualification costs, manufacturing reliability, and portfolio cross-selling.
What FDA regulatory status applies to crospovidone?
Crospovidone is an established pharmaceutical excipient, not an active drug substance. The FDA does not approve crospovidone through a standalone new drug application.
Regulatory status is established through:
- Inclusion in an approved drug product
- Compliance with relevant United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary standards
- Supplier quality systems
- Drug Master File or equivalent confidential technical documentation where used
- Customer qualification and pharmaceutical development data
- Compliance with applicable current good manufacturing practice requirements
The FDA’s Inactive Ingredient Database is a key reference for prior use in approved products. The database identifies inactive ingredients by route, dosage form, and maximum potency information where available, but inclusion does not constitute a blanket approval for every formulation or route of administration. Manufacturers remain responsible for product-specific safety, quality, and performance.
Crospovidone is also covered by major international compendia, including the European Pharmacopoeia and Japanese Pharmacopoeia in relevant editions. Customers typically assess compendial conformity, residual monomers, elemental impurities, microbiological quality, particle size, moisture, and extractables or leachables where applicable.
What patents protect crospovidone?
The core composition of crospovidone is mature and is not generally protected by a currently enforceable foundational composition patent. Commercial protection is more likely to arise from:
- Manufacturing processes
- Crosslinking methods
- Particle-size control
- Porosity and bulk-density engineering
- Co-processing with other excipients
- Specialized tablet formulations
- Delivery systems using crospovidone
- Product-specific trademarks and technical know-how
Patent rights may exist for particular processes or formulations, but they do not create a single global exclusivity barrier around all crospovidone production. Rights must be assessed by jurisdiction, claim scope, filing date, prosecution history, maintenance status, and ownership.
Is crospovidone listed in the Orange Book?
No. Crospovidone is an excipient and is not listed as an FDA Orange Book reference product. The Orange Book covers approved drug products and patent or exclusivity information associated with those products, not standalone excipient protection.
Are there Paragraph IV challenges involving crospovidone?
Paragraph IV litigation applies to abbreviated new drug applications that challenge patents listed for a branded drug product. It does not apply to crospovidone as an excipient.
A generic drug containing crospovidone may be involved in Paragraph IV litigation over the active ingredient, formulation, method of treatment, dosage regimen, or drug-device combination. That litigation does not establish exclusivity over the excipient itself.
What formulation and method-of-use patents involve crospovidone?
Crospovidone can appear in patents claiming:
- Immediate-release tablets
- Orally disintegrating tablets
- Taste-masked formulations
- Abuse-deterrent dosage forms
- Fixed-dose combinations
- Multiparticulate systems
- Fast-dissolving films or granules
- Specific ratios of excipients
- Compression and granulation processes
These claims are usually directed to the drug product or dosage form rather than crospovidone alone. The commercial risk depends on whether the patent requires a particular crospovidone grade, particle-size range, concentration, manufacturing step, or functional result.
A formulation patent can limit use of a crospovidone-containing product even when the excipient itself is freely available. Conversely, a supplier can sell crospovidone without infringing a drug-product patent if the supplier does not practice the claimed formulation or process.
What licensing deals and settlement agreements affect crospovidone?
Public licensing and settlement agreements specifically covering crospovidone are uncommon. Excipient manufacturers typically sell through direct supply contracts, distributors, technical-service agreements, and quality agreements rather than patent licenses.
Settlement agreements involving generic drugs may permit launch of a product containing crospovidone before expiration of branded-drug patents. Those agreements generally concern the active pharmaceutical product and do not transfer or restrict ownership of crospovidone technology.
Confidential supply and quality agreements can still have commercial importance. They may include minimum volumes, change-control restrictions, audit rights, geographic supply provisions, and notification periods for manufacturing changes.
What generic entry risks exist for crospovidone suppliers?
Crospovidone has low direct patent risk but meaningful commercial and operational risk.
The main risks are:
- Substitution by croscarmellose sodium or sodium starch glycolate
- Price competition from regional suppliers
- Customer consolidation of excipient vendors
- Qualification delays for new drug products
- Pharmaceutical inventory destocking
- Failure to meet compendial or customer-specific specifications
- Manufacturing interruption
- Regulatory scrutiny of changes in raw materials or process controls
- Loss of a major generic customer after formulation redesign
The most defensible supplier position combines validated performance, consistent batch characteristics, regulatory documentation, global supply, and formulation support. Product branding alone is less durable than demonstrated process value.
How strong is the crospovidone patent estate?
The patent estate is weak at the foundational product level and stronger at the process and formulation level.
| Patent layer | Relative strength |
|---|---|
| Core crospovidone composition | Low |
| Basic use as a tablet disintegrant | Low |
| Manufacturing process | Moderate, jurisdiction-specific |
| Particle engineering | Moderate |
| Co-processed excipient systems | Moderate to high for narrow claims |
| Drug-specific formulation | Potentially high |
| Method-of-use claims | Product-specific |
| Trademark and technical know-how | Commercial rather than patent exclusivity |
Freedom-to-operate analysis must therefore focus on specific manufacturing routes and customer formulations. A generic crospovidone supplier is unlikely to face a single patent blocking the entire market, but a particular process or engineered grade can fall within narrower claims.
What is the outlook for crospovidone through 2030?
Crospovidone should remain a stable growth excipient through 2030, supported by oral-solid dosage manufacturing, generic medicines, and demand for efficient tablet processing.
The market is likely to divide into two tiers:
- Standard grades competing primarily on price and supply reliability
- Premium grades competing on particle engineering, performance data, regulatory support, and global availability
Revenue growth should be strongest in Asia-Pacific and other regions expanding pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity. North America and Europe should remain important for premium products, technical qualification, and regulated-market supply.
No major technology is likely to eliminate crospovidone demand. Substitution will continue at the formulation level, but the broad market is mature and diversified. Supplier earnings will depend more on product mix, plant utilization, pricing discipline, and customer retention than on patent expiry.
Key Takeaways
- Crospovidone is a mature crosslinked polyvinylpyrrolidone excipient used mainly as a tablet superdisintegrant.
- Generic and over-the-counter solid-dose medicines are the primary demand base.
- Ashland, BASF, JRS Pharma, and Asian manufacturers are major competitive participants.
- Public companies do not generally disclose crospovidone revenue separately, so financial analysis relies on broader excipient and life-science segment data.
- The foundational composition is generally not protected by a meaningful current global patent barrier.
- Process, particle-engineering, co-processing, and drug-specific formulation patents can create narrower risks.
- Crospovidone has no standalone Orange Book listing and is not subject to Paragraph IV challenges as an excipient.
- The strongest commercial barriers are qualification, consistency, regulatory documentation, and supply reliability.
- The outlook through 2030 is stable to moderately positive, with pricing pressure in standard grades and better economics for engineered products.
FAQs
Is crospovidone the same as povidone?
No. Povidone is generally water-soluble polyvinylpyrrolidone. Crospovidone is crosslinked, water-insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone used mainly as a disintegrant.
Can crospovidone be replaced without regulatory approval?
A replacement may require formulation studies, comparative dissolution, stability testing, process validation, and a regulatory filing. The required action depends on the product, jurisdiction, change level, and applicable post-approval change rules.
Which excipient competes most directly with crospovidone?
Croscarmellose sodium is the closest broad commercial substitute. Sodium starch glycolate is another widely used alternative.
Does crospovidone create supply risk for generic drug manufacturers?
Yes. Supply risk can arise from limited qualified sources, manufacturing changes, batch variability, transport interruptions, or failure to meet customer-specific particle and performance specifications.
Is crospovidone suitable for biologic drug products?
Its principal use is in oral solid dosage forms, while most biologic products are injectable or otherwise non-solid. Crospovidone therefore has limited direct exposure to biologics growth.
References
-
Ashland Global Holdings Inc. (2023). Annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
-
BASF SE. (2023). BASF report 2023. BASF SE.
-
European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare. (2024). European Pharmacopoeia. Council of Europe.
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Inactive Ingredient Database. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/iig/index.cfm
-
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
-
United States Pharmacopeial Convention. (2024). United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary. United States Pharmacopeial Convention.
-
JRS Pharma. (2024). Pharmaceutical excipients and formulation solutions. JRS Pharma.
-
BASF. (2024). Kollidon pharmaceutical excipients: Technical product information. BASF SE.
-
Ashland. (2024). Polyplasdone crospovidone: Pharmaceutical excipient product information. Ashland Global Holdings Inc.
More… ↓
Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing
Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.
Alerts Available With Subscription
Alerts are available for users with active subscriptions.
Visit the Subscription Options page for details on plans and pricing.
ISSN: 2162-2639

Privacy and Cookies
Terms & Conditions
Site Map
DrugPatentWatch Alternatives
LOE / Generic Entry Opportunies 2026 - 2027
NCE-1 Patent Challenge Dates 2026 - 2027
Friedman, Yali. "DrugPatentWatch" DrugPatentWatch, thinkBiotech, 2026, www.DrugPatentWatch.com.
See Primary Research Papers Citing DrugPatentWatch
Access the Complete Database
Make Better Decisions
- Analyze global market entry opportunities
- Uncover prior art in expired and abandoned patents
- Obtain formulation and manufacturing information