You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

List of Excipients in Branded Drug ERTAPENEM SODIUM


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Generic Drugs Containing ERTAPENEM SODIUM

Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities for ERTAPENEM SODIUM

Last updated: February 27, 2026

What is the excipient profile for ertapenem sodium?

Ertapenem sodium is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic administered intravenously or intramuscularly. Its formulation requires specific excipients to ensure stability, solubility, and bioavailability. The typical excipients include:

  • Lactose monohydrate: Used as a filler for reconstituted solutions.
  • Sodium carbonate: Adjusts pH to improve stability.
  • Sodium citrate: Buffers solution and maintains pH.
  • Water for injection: Solvent.
  • Sodium chloride: Isotonizing agent in specific formulations.

The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) and European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) set standards for excipient quality, emphasizing purity and compatibility with active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).

How does excipient choice influence formulation stability?

Ertapenem sodium's stability is pH-sensitive, favoring a pH range between 4.0 and 5.0. Excipients like sodium citrate and sodium carbonate buffer the solution, preventing degradation. Lactose monohydrate enhances solubility but can affect stability if contamination occurs or if the solution is exposed to humidity. Selecting excipients that do not react with the API or catalyze hydrolysis is crucial for shelf life, which typically spans 24 to 48 hours at 25°C after reconstitution[1].

What are the commercial implications of excipient selection?

Manufacturing cost implications

  • Availability and price of excipients: Lactose is inexpensive and widely available. Buffered agents like sodium citrate require controlled quality, influencing costs.
  • Complexity of formulation: Use of multiple buffering agents or stabilizers increases manufacturing steps, impacting batch costs.

Regulatory considerations

  • Excipients must meet pharmacopeial standards and undergo safety evaluation.
  • Novel excipients or new combinations may require additional regulatory approval, delaying product launch and increasing costs.

Patent and market exclusivity

  • Excipient formulations can be protected via process patents, extending market exclusivity beyond the API patent if innovative.
  • Modified formulations with improved stability or reduced excipient amounts can qualify for biowaivers or simplified approval pathways.

Commercial opportunities

  • Fixed-dose combination (FDC) products: Combining ertapenem sodium with other antibiotics or stabilizers, leveraging excipient compatibility for broader indications.
  • Formulation innovations: Developing lyophilized powders with enhanced stability, reducing cold chain requirements, and expanding market reach in resource-limited settings.
  • Contract manufacturing services: Providing excipient formulation customization for third-party clients, capitalizing on infrastructure for sterile injectable production.

How can sustainable excipient strategies enhance market positioning?

  • Prioritizing excipients with low allergenic potential minimizes adverse reactions, increasing patient safety.
  • Sourcing excipients from suppliers committed to environmental sustainability aligns with corporate social responsibility, appealing to investors and regulators.
  • Developing formulations with reduced excipient volume can ease manufacturing, lower costs, and improve patient compliance.

What are future trends affecting excipient strategies for ertapenem sodium?

  • Novel excipients: Use of biocompatible, biodegradable polymers for controlled release.
  • Nanotechnology: Incorporating excipients that facilitate nanoparticle formulations to enhance tissue penetration.
  • Regulatory evolution: Increased oversight on excipient safety profiles may restrict certain excipients, prompting innovation.

Key Takeaways

  • The excipient profile for ertapenem sodium centers around buffers, stabilizers, and fillers that ensure stability and solubility.
  • Cost, regulatory approval, and formulation stability directly influence commercial success.
  • Innovation in excipient formulation, including FDCs and lyophilized powders, offers growth avenues.
  • Sustainable sourcing and minimal excipient volumes can improve market positioning.
  • Trend shifts favor biocompatible and biodegradable excipients, potentially opening new formulation pathways.

FAQs

1. Can excipient choice impact the shelf life of ertapenem sodium?
Yes. Buffers and stabilizers maintain pH and protect the API from degradation, directly affecting shelf life, typically 24–48 hours at room temperature after reconstitution.

2. Are there proprietary excipient formulations for ertapenem sodium?
Most formulations use standard, off-the-shelf excipients. Patented excipient combinations for ertapenem sodium are uncommon but could arise from formulation innovations or delivery systems.

3. How do regulatory agencies view excipient modifications in ertapenem sodium formulations?
Regulatory agencies require stability and safety data for excipient changes. Alterations should meet pharmacopeial standards and often necessitate supplemental filings unless classified as minor modifications.

4. What role do excipients play in developing generic versions of ertapenem sodium?
Excipients contribute to processability, stability, and bioavailability. Generics must match reference product excipients or demonstrate bioequivalence via suitable testing.

5. What is the impact of excipient sourcing on global distribution?
Ensuring consistent excipient supply, especially for sterile, high-purity standards, can influence manufacturing schedules, cost, and geographic market access.


References

[1] U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP). (2022). General Chapters: Packaging and Storage; Stability testing of injectable drugs.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.