You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

List of Excipients in Branded Drug 24 HOUR ALLERGY


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Company Tradename Ingredient NDC Excipient Potential Generic Entry
Walgreens 24 HOUR ALLERGY cetirizine hcl 0363-1219 FD&C YELLOW NO. 6
Walgreens 24 HOUR ALLERGY cetirizine hcl 0363-1219 GELATIN
Walgreens 24 HOUR ALLERGY cetirizine hcl 0363-1219 GLYCERIN
>Company >Tradename >Ingredient >NDC >Excipient >Potential Generic Entry

Excipient Strategy and Commercial Opportunities for 24 HOUR ALLERGY

Last updated: February 26, 2026

What are the key excipient considerations for 24 HOUR ALLERGY?

The formulation of 24 Hour Allergy primarily involves active ingredients such as cetirizine or loratadine. The excipients support stability, bioavailability, and patient compliance.

Common excipients include:

  • Fillers: microcrystalline cellulose, lactose
  • Disintegrants: croscarmellose sodium, sodium starch glycolate
  • Flavoring agents: flavorings to improve palatability
  • Preservatives: sodium benzoate, parabens
  • Binders and lubricants: magnesium stearate, povidone

Formulation strategies

  • Use excipients compatible with antihistamines to avoid stability issues.
  • Incorporate taste-masking agents for oral solutions or dispersible forms.
  • Select excipients that improve shelf life and reduce degradation risks.

What are the main commercial opportunities in excipient development?

Opportunities include:

  • Enhanced bioavailability formulations: using lipophilic excipients or solubilizers to improve onset.
  • Reduced excipient toxicity: developing excipients with improved safety profiles.
  • Patient-centric delivery: creating dispersible tablets, liquid formulations, or dissolvable strips requiring specific excipients.
  • Regulatory compliance: sourcing excipients with established safety data to accelerate approval.

Market drivers

  • Increasing demand for fast-acting, convenient allergy medications.
  • Growing preference toward pediatric and geriatric formulations.
  • Regulatory emphasis on excipient safety and transparency.

Competitive landscape

  • Larger pharma firms focus on proprietary excipient complexes.
  • Specialty excipient manufacturers develop tailored solutions.
  • Generic manufacturers optimize excipient compositions for cost efficiency.

How do regulatory policies affect excipient use?

  • The U.S. FDA and EMA require detailed excipient safety data.
  • Novel excipients face higher approval requirements.
  • Labeling regulations mandate disclosure of all excipients, influencing formulation choices.

What are the innovation areas for excipients in allergy drugs?

  • Use of natural excipients to align with clean-label trends.
  • Development of multifunctional excipients that combine disintegrant, binder, and flavoring roles.
  • Implementation of advanced excipient technology like film coatings for taste masking and controlled release.

What are the risks associated with excipient choices?

  • Potential allergic reactions, especially in sensitive populations.
  • Stability issues leading to reduced shelf life.
  • Cost implications of using high-quality or proprietary excipients.
  • Regulatory delays if excipients lack clear safety profiles.

Summary of formulation strategies

Strategy Purpose Examples
Taste masking Improve patient compliance Flavored coatings, sweeteners like sorbitol
Controlled release Extend drug action Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose coatings
Rapid disintegration Enhance onset Croscarmellose sodium
Stability enhancement Prevent degradation Antioxidant excipients like ascorbic acid

Conclusion

Formulating 24 Hour Allergy with the appropriate excipients enhances product efficacy, safety, and consumer appeal. The market favors innovative excipient approaches that respond to regulatory demands and consumer preferences, presenting opportunities for differentiated formulations.


Key Takeaways

  • Excipient selection in 24 Hour Allergy formulations centers on compatibility, stability, and patient experience.
  • Market trends favor natural, multifunctional, and safety-verified excipients.
  • Regulatory compliance shapes excipient choice, especially for sensitive populations.
  • Innovation in excipient technology offers competitive advantages.
  • Cost, safety, and regulatory risks must be managed in excipient strategy.

FAQs

1. How does excipient choice impact the shelf life of allergy medications?
Excipients influence drug stability by either protecting active ingredients from degradation or causing instability if incompatible. Proper selection extends shelf life and maintains efficacy.

2. Are natural excipients preferable for allergy formulations?
Natural excipients meet consumer demand for "clean-label" products and may reduce allergic reactions. However, they require thorough stability and safety evaluation.

3. What excipients are critical for pediatric allergy medications?
Taste masking agents, dispersible excipients, and safety-verified preservatives are crucial. Compatibility with young patients' sensitivities guides selection.

4. How do regulatory agencies influence excipient innovation?
Agencies require detailed safety profiles and restrict the use of novel excipients unless thoroughly evaluated, limiting rapid adoption but encouraging safety-focused innovation.

5. What cost considerations affect excipient strategy?
High-quality or proprietary excipients increase formulation costs but may improve safety and efficacy. Balancing cost and benefit is essential for competitive pricing.


References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2020). Guidance for Industry: Excipients in Drug Products.
  2. European Medicines Agency (EMA). (2019). Guideline on excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products.

[1] FDA. (2020). Guidance for Industry: Excipients in Drug Products.
[2] EMA. (2019). Guideline on excipients in the label and package leaflet of medicinal products.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.