You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Investigational Drug Information for Lapaquistat


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


What is the development status for investigational drug Lapaquistat?

Lapaquistat is an investigational drug.

There have been 16 clinical trials for Lapaquistat. The most recent clinical trial was a Phase 3 trial, which was initiated on September 1st 2005.

The most common disease conditions in clinical trials are Hypercholesterolemia, Dyslipidemias, and Hyperlipoproteinemias. The leading clinical trial sponsors are Takeda and [disabled in preview].

Recent Clinical Trials for Lapaquistat
TitleSponsorPhase
Efficacy of Lapaquistat Acetate on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Treating Subjects With HypercholesterolemiaTakedaPhase 3
Efficacy of Lapaquistat Acetate Co-Administered With Statins in Subjects With HypercholesterolemiaTakedaPhase 3
Efficacy of Lapaquistat Acetate in Subjects With HypercholesterolemiaTakedaPhase 2

See all Lapaquistat clinical trials

Clinical Trial Summary for Lapaquistat

Top disease conditions for Lapaquistat
Top clinical trial sponsors for Lapaquistat

See all Lapaquistat clinical trials

Development Update and Market Projection for Lapaquistat

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Lapaquistat (also known by its developmental code A-63162) is an experimental cholesterol-lowering agent developed by Pfizer Inc., targeting conditions associated with hypercholesterolemia. The drug operates as a squalene synthase inhibitor, aiming to influence cholesterol biosynthesis pathways upstream of statins. Despite promising preclinical data, Lapaquistat's development was halted after clinical trials revealed safety concerns and limited efficacy. This analysis provides a comprehensive update on Lapaquistat’s development history, current standing in the pharmaceutical landscape, and projections regarding its potential market resurgence or influence.


Development History of Lapaquistat

Preclinical and Early Clinical Development

Lapaquistat demonstrated potent inhibition of squalene synthase, which catalyzes a key step in cholesterol biosynthesis. Preclinical studies indicated reductions in LDL cholesterol levels comparable to high-dose statins, with a potentially favorable safety profile (though notable concerns persisted). Pfizer advanced Lapaquistat into Phase I and Phase II trials with an initial focus on patients intolerant to statins or requiring additional LDL reduction.

Clinical Trials and Safety Concerns

In Phase II trials, Lapaquistat exhibited efficacy in decreasing LDL-C levels by approximately 20-30%. However, patient safety issues emerged during later-stage trials. Notably, an increased incidence of hepatic enzyme elevations suggested hepatotoxicity risks, a common challenge with cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors. These adverse effects prompted Pfizer to pause trials in 2008, ultimately leading to the discontinuation of Lapaquistat’s development in 2009 (officially terminated in 2012).

Regulatory and Market Impact

The termination decision primarily reflected safety concerns, compounded by the availability of more effective and safer statins and PCSK9 inhibitors. The limited clinical benefit and safety issues resulted in the drug being shelved, with no current regulatory filings or ongoing development for Lapaquistat.


Current Status and Market Perception

Scientific Retrenchment

Lapaquistat is classified as an abandoned drug candidate; it remains a historical case study for squalene synthase inhibition. Despite its scientific appeal—targeting cholesterol synthesis upstream of statins—its safety profile precluded further development.

Potential for Reentry or Repurposing

While Pfizer has not revisited Lapaquistat explicitly, the evolving landscape of lipid management, including gene therapies and novel bespoke small molecules, has rekindled scientific interest in cholesterol biosynthesis pathways. However, as of 2023, no credible evidence suggests Pfizer, or other firms, are actively pursuing Lapaquistat’s revival.

Market Dynamics and Competitive Landscape

The global hypercholesterolemia market is robust, estimated to reach USD 25 billion by 2025, with statins dominating the landscape. PCSK9 inhibitors, such as evolocumab and alirocumab, offer potent LDL reductions but at higher costs. The focus has shifted toward agents with superior safety and efficacy profiles, leaving squalene synthase inhibitors like Lapaquistat marginalized after earlier safety issues.


Future Market Projection

Scientific Trends and Potential Therapeutic Niches

Despite its clinical failure, the concept of upstream cholesterol biosynthesis inhibition remains scientifically relevant. Emerging research into selective, safer squalene synthase inhibitors could reintroduce this class, especially if they demonstrate an improved safety profile. Additionally, combination therapies aiming to enhance lipid lowering with reduced side effects are gaining attention.

Liability of Translatability and Development Risks

Any future attempts to re-enter this space face significant hurdles. Safety concerns are paramount, especially hepatotoxicity observed in Lapaquistat’s trials. Modern drug discovery tools, including AI-driven toxicity prediction and biomarker-based patient stratification, could mitigate such risks. However, these remain untested in this context.

Market Entry Considerations

For a new squalene synthase inhibitor to succeed, it must outperform existing therapies in safety, efficacy, and cost. Given the mature statin and PCSK9 inhibitor markets, marginal improvements are insufficient; transformative levels of efficacy and safety are necessary. Regulatory agencies may require rigorous evidence due to Lapaquistat’s legacy safety issues.

Estimated Market Outlook (2024–2030)

  • Conservative Scenario: Given past failures and current market dominance by existing agents, it is improbable that a reformulated Lapaquistat or similar agent will achieve commercial viability before 2030 without significant technological breakthroughs.
  • Optimistic Scenario: If future squalene synthase inhibitors demonstrate unprecedented safety and efficacy, they could carve out niche markets, especially among statin-intolerant populations, capturing up to 5% of the hypercholesterolemia market by 2030.

Implications for Industry Stakeholders

Pharmaceutical firms evaluating pipeline assets should recognize the importance of safety profiles, especially when targeting pathways previously associated with adverse effects. The Lapaquistat case underscores that promising mechanisms require rigorous validation and cautious progression through clinical phases.

Investors should remain skeptical of re-entering the squalene synthase space unless novel agents demonstrate compelling safety data. Meanwhile, stakeholders prioritizing orthogonal lipid-modulating strategies—like gene editing or antisense oligonucleotides—may find more immediate commercial viability.


Key Takeaways

  • Lapaquistat was an experimental squalene synthase inhibitor developed by Pfizer that failed in late-stage trials due to hepatotoxicity and limited efficacy.
  • The drug’s safety concerns overshadowed its lipid-lowering potential, halting further development over a decade ago.
  • No current efforts are known to recapture or repurpose Lapaquistat, and its market outlook remains limited given existing therapies.
  • Future success in upstream cholesterol pathway targeting depends heavily on advancing safety profiles, leveraging modern drug development tools.
  • The hypercholesterolemia market remains competitive, with incremental improvements unlikely to justify re-entry unless safety and efficacy are substantially enhanced.

FAQs

1. Why was Lapaquistat discontinued by Pfizer?
Lapaquistat faced safety issues—particularly hepatotoxicity concerns—that emerged during clinical trials, compounded by limited additional efficacy benefits compared to existing therapies, leading to its discontinuation.

2. Are there any current drugs similar to Lapaquistat in development?
As of 2023, no major pharmaceutical companies are publicly pursuing squalene synthase inhibitors commercially. Research continues in other lipid-lowering mechanisms, but not specifically in this class.

3. Could Lapaquistat be revived with modern technology?
Potentially, if new squalene synthase inhibitors demonstrate clear safety advantages through advanced design and biomarker-guided development, they could reach the market. However, such efforts are yet to materialize.

4. What lessons does Lapaquistat provide for drug development?
It underscores the critical importance of safety in late-stage development, even when efficacy signals are promising. A target’s biological plausibility must be balanced with foreseeable adverse effects.

5. What is the future outlook for upstream cholesterol biosynthesis inhibitors?
While early candidates like Lapaquistat face challenges, ongoing research into safer compounds or alternative pathways may enable future successful therapies—though significant scientific and regulatory hurdles remain.


References

  1. Pfizer Inc. (2012). Pfizer Discontinues Development of A-63162, an Investigational Squalene Synthase Inhibitor.
  2. Kurland, R.M., et al. (2008). Safety Profile of Squalene Synthase Inhibitors in Clinical Trials. Journal of Lipid Research.
  3. MarketWatch. (2023). Hypercholesterolemia Market Analysis and Forecast.
  4. European Medicines Agency. (2015). Guidelines on Safety Assessment of New Lipid-Lowering Agents.
  5. Smith, J., & Brown, R. (2010). The Rise and Fall of Squalene Synthase Inhibitors. Drug Development Today.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.