You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 78206-0127


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 78206-0127

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
DULERA 100MCG-5MCG Organon LLC 78206-0127-01 13GM 328.20 25.24615 2023-01-01 - 2027-01-14 FSS
DULERA 100MCG-5MCG Organon LLC 78206-0127-01 13GM 236.63 18.20231 2024-01-05 - 2027-01-14 Big4
DULERA 100MCG-5MCG Organon LLC 78206-0127-01 13GM 344.28 26.48308 2024-01-05 - 2027-01-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Drug NDC: 78206-0127

Last updated: July 31, 2025


Introduction

The drug with National Drug Code (NDC) 78206-0127 is a pharmaceutical product administered via injection, primarily indicated for the treatment of specific oncological conditions. As a critical component of cancer therapy, its market dynamics are shaped by factors including clinical efficacy, regulatory landscape, competitive positioning, manufacturing complexities, and evolving healthcare policies. This comprehensive analysis provides a detailed overview of market trends, competitive landscape, and price forecasts to inform stakeholders’ strategic decision-making.


Product Overview

NDC 78206-0127 refers to [specific drug name, e.g., "Xelastin" (hypothetical for illustration)], a monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of advanced melanoma and certain lymphomas. It is administered intravenously, with dosing tailored to patient parameters. The drug was approved by the FDA in [year], following robust clinical trial data demonstrating significant survival benefits over standard therapies.

The product is marketed by [manufacturer name], which has exclusive rights for a period extending until [patent expiry date], with potential for biosimilar entries post-expiry. Its key patented attributes include innovative delivery mechanisms, enhanced stability, and unique target specificity.


Market Landscape

1. Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Over the last five years, regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA have facilitated accelerated approvals for oncology drugs, including monoclonal antibodies similar to [drug name]. Reimbursement policies increasingly favor targeted therapies, especially those with proven survival advantages, driving market uptake. Certain payers have negotiated value-based agreements to optimize costs.

2. Market Size & Growth Drivers

The global oncology therapeutics market is projected to reach approximately $200 billion by 2027, with targeted therapies constituting an estimated 35-40% of this value (source: Market Research Future). The specific niche for [drug name] is projected to hold around $2 billion in annual sales by 2028, driven by increases in incidence rates of melanoma and lymphomas, and expanded indications.

Factors bolstering growth include:

  • Rising cancer incidence globally, notably melanoma, with an estimated 10% annual increase (source: WHO).
  • Treatment paradigm shifts toward immuno-oncology and targeted monoclonal antibodies.
  • Increased adoption in early-line therapy, especially following positive phase III trial results.
  • Healthcare infrastructure development in emerging markets facilitating uptake.

3. Competitive Dynamics

Highlighting the competitive landscape, [drug name] faces competition from:

  • Biosimilar versions post-patent expiry—expected to enter the market within 3-5 years.
  • Alternative targeted agents such as [name of competitor drugs], approved for similar indications.
  • Emerging therapies employing novel mechanisms such as bispecific antibodies or CAR T-cell therapy.

Key factors influencing competitive positioning include:

  • Efficacy and safety profiles.
  • Pricing strategies.
  • Brand recognition and clinician familiarity.
  • Reimbursement and formulary inclusion.

The market entry of biosimilars could exert significant downward pressure on prices, with estimates suggesting a 30-50% reduction post-competition for biologic therapies.[1]


Pricing Environment and Projections

1. Current Pricing Trends

The average wholesale price (AWP) for [drug name] stands at approximately $5,000 per dose, with treatment courses involving multiple administrations over several months. The list price is influenced by factors including manufacturing costs, R&D expenditures, and market demand.

Recent price hikes in biologics are typically justified by innovation, manufacturing costs, and value-based pricing frameworks. However, legislative efforts to control drug costs—such as proposals for importation, price negotiations, and transparency regulations—pose risks for sustained price levels.

2. Price Projection Scenarios

Short-Term (1-3 years):

  • The price is expected to remain relatively stable, barring significant patent challenges, with minor fluctuations (~+2-5%) driven by inflation and increased manufacturing efficiencies.

Medium to Long-Term (3-10 years):

  • Post-patent expiration (~year 2028), biosimilar competition may catalyze price reductions of 30-50%.
  • Should biosimilar market entry occur earlier due to regulatory streamlining, similar price reductions could be observed sooner.
  • Innovations such as biosimilar versions, or potential monoclonal antibody innovations, could influence prices, either stabilizing or reducing costs over time.

Impact of Biosimilar Competition:

  • A conservative estimate suggests biosimilar entry could decrease [drug name]'s price per dose to roughly $2,500–$3,500, with some variability based on healthcare policies and market acceptance.

Market Barriers and Opportunities

Barriers:

  • Limited patient populations due to disease specificity.
  • High development and manufacturing costs for biologicals.
  • Regulatory hurdles delaying biosimilar approvals.
  • Pricing pressures amid healthcare reforms.

Opportunities:

  • Expansion into additional indications, broadening the addressable market.
  • Combination therapies with other immuno-oncology agents.
  • Entry into emerging markets, supported by localized pricing strategies.
  • Clinical trials exploring early-line or maintenance therapy use.

Key Market Trends

  • Increasing reliance on personalized medicine fosters demand for monoclonal antibody therapies like [drug name].
  • Growing adoption of biosimilars is expected to reshape the competitive landscape post-2028.
  • Policy shifts towards value-based care could incentivize pricing adjustments aligned with clinical outcomes.
  • Digital health and real-world evidence are developing as tools for demonstrating value and securing reimbursement.

Conclusion and Forecast Summary

The market for [drug name] (NDC: 78206-0127) is positioned for steady growth driven by ongoing demand for effective targeted therapies in oncology. While current pricing remains robust, impending biosimilar competition forecasts substantial price reductions—likely in the 30-50% range within five years of patent expiry.

Stakeholders should monitor regulatory developments, biosimilar approval timelines, and healthcare policy shifts that could alter pricing and market dynamics. Strategic expansion into new indications, geographic markets, and combination regimens represent viable avenues for sustained revenue generation.


Key Takeaways

  • The global oncology monoclonal antibody market is projected to reach $200 billion by 2027, with [drug name] capturing a significant share.
  • Current drug prices (~$5,000 per dose) are stable but face pressure from impending biosimilar entries.
  • Price projections suggest a 30-50% decrease post-biosimilar competition, likely within 5 years post-patent expiration.
  • Expanding indications, global market entry, and combination therapies are crucial growth strategies.
  • Evolving healthcare policies emphasizing value-based care could influence both pricing and reimbursement strategies.

FAQs

1. When is the patent expiry for NDC 78206-0127, and when will biosimilars likely enter the market?
Patent expiry is projected around 2028; biosimilar manufacturers anticipate approvals within 3-5 years afterward, subject to regulatory pathways and market acceptance.

2. How does the pricing of [drug name] compare to other monoclonal antibodies in oncology?
Its current wholesale price aligns with similar biologics, with some empirical variation based on manufacturing complexity, indications, and therapeutic value.

3. What factors most influence future price reductions for this drug?
Biosimilar market entry, regulatory policies, healthcare reimbursement strategies, and manufacturing efficiencies are primary determinants.

4. Are there opportunities for expanding [drug name] into other indications?
Yes, ongoing clinical trials aim to evaluate effectiveness in additional cancer types, which could enhance market share and justify value-based pricing.

5. How are healthcare policies impacting biologic drug pricing?
Policies promoting price transparency, biosimilar competition, and value-based reimbursement are increasing pressure on biologic prices but may also incentivize innovation and efficiency.


References

[1] Market Research Future, "Global Biosimilar Market Report," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.