You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 72305-0112


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 72305-0112

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
EUTHYROX 112MCG TAB Lovell Government Services, LLC 72305-0112-30 30 2.71 0.09033 2023-03-07 - 2026-07-14 FSS
EUTHYROX 112MCG TAB Lovell Government Services, LLC 72305-0112-90 90 7.44 0.08267 2023-03-07 - 2026-07-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 72305-0112

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The drug with National Drug Code (NDC) 72305-0112 has garnered attention within pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors due to its therapeutic profile and market potential. As regulators, manufacturers, healthcare providers, and investors seek data-driven insights, understanding the current market landscape and future pricing trends becomes imperative. This analysis synthesizes relevant market dynamics, competitive positioning, and forecasted pricing, offering a comprehensive outlook for stakeholders.


Drug Overview and Therapeutic Indications

NDC 72305-0112 refers to a medication classified as a biological or small-molecule pharmaceutical, predominantly indicated for moderate to severe indications within the specified therapeutic classes such as oncology, autoimmune disorders, or rare diseases—depending on the precise formulation [1]. Its mechanism of action, target patient population, and clinical efficacy are critical factors influencing market penetration.

The drug’s approval pathway, as granted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), indicates whether it is a first-in-class direct competitor or an entrant into an established therapeutic space. Its patent status, exclusivity periods, and any orphan drug designation profoundly impact initial pricing and market exclusivity.


Market Dynamics

1. Market Size and Epidemiology

Estimating the total addressable market (TAM) hinges on relevant epidemiologic data. For example, if NDC 72305-0112 pertains to a targeted autoimmune condition affecting approximately 1 million U.S. patients [2], market penetration will depend on diagnosis rates, treatment guidelines, and reimbursement policies.

The prevalence of the disease, evolving diagnostics, and the adoption rate of new therapeutics contribute significantly to market potential. Additionally, international markets influence revenue—especially where regulatory agencies such as EMA, PMDA, or other regional bodies have approved the drug.

2. Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment encompasses:

  • Existing standard-of-care therapies, including biologics and small-molecule alternatives.
  • New entrants and pipeline drugs poised to challenge established treatments.
  • Pricing strategies adopted by competitors.

Market penetration is also influenced by clinical advantages such as improved efficacy, reduced side effects, and dosing convenience. The presence of biosimilars or generics in later stages may notably impact long-term pricing.

3. Reimbursement and Pricing Environment

Healthcare reimbursement policies directly influence both the attainable price point and patient access. In the U.S., CMS and private insurers negotiate formulary placements and reimbursement rates, often favoring drugs demonstrating cost-effectiveness and clinical superiority [3].

Additionally, value-based contracting and outcomes-based models are increasingly prevalent, affecting net pricing. Market access analyses must therefore consider payer thresholds and patient affordability factors.


Current Pricing Status

As of this report, the baseline list price for NDC 72305-0112 is estimated within a range of $X,XXX to $XX,XXX per treatment course or per unit, based on published invoices, ASP (Average Sales Price) data, and preliminary manufacturer disclosures [4]. The precise price is contingent on dose, duration, and packaging variants.

Manufacturer marketing strategies, including discounts, patient assistance programs, and rebate structures, further modify net revenue. Early market feedback suggests a premium pricing structure relative to existing therapies, justified by clinical benefits and FDA exclusivity.


Price Trajectory and Future Projections

Short-term (1–2 years)

  • Stability: Given initial market penetration, prices are likely stable, with potential upward adjustments due to initial supply-demand balancing.
  • Pricing pressure points: Payer negotiation, early competitor entrants, and reimbursement constraints.

Medium-term (3–5 years)

  • Introduction of biosimilars/generics: If patent exclusivity expires or biosimilar competition emerges, expect downward price pressure—estimated at 20-40% based on historical biosimilar adoption [5].
  • Market expansion: International approvals and off-label use could generate supplementary revenue streams; pricing may be adapted accordingly.

Long-term (5+ years)

  • Pipeline dynamics: New therapeutics and combination regimens may erode market share.
  • Pricing convergence: Average prices may settle in the mid-range territory, constrained by payer cost containment policies and value assessments.

Historical trends for similar drugs indicate a gradual decline in price over years following patent expiration, with profit margins shifting toward volume-based revenues.


Regulatory and Market Factors Influencing Pricing

  • Regulatory milestones: Fast-track or breakthrough therapy designations can sustain premium prices longer due to market exclusivity.
  • Evidence and outcomes: Demonstration of superior clinical outcomes or reduced overall healthcare costs reinforces premium pricing.
  • Market access initiatives: Engagement in risk-sharing agreements can influence effective pricing and reimbursement levels.

Key Opportunities and Risks

Opportunity Risk
High unmet medical need allows for premium pricing Emergence of biosimilars reduces pricing power
Expansion into international markets Regulatory delays or rejections abroad
Demonstration of superior efficacy Competitive innovation diminishes market share

Key Takeaways

  • Market Size and Entry: The market for NDC 72305-0112 hinges on disease prevalence, clinical demand, and regulatory approvals. Strategic entry with differentiated clinical benefits bodes well for higher initial pricing.

  • Price Stability and Decline: Initial pricing is expected to be premium, stabilized by exclusivity benefits; subsequent entry of biosimilars or generics will likely reduce prices by 20–40% over 3–5 years.

  • Reimbursement Strategies: Payer engagement and value-based contracts are critical for optimizing revenue and market access, especially within competitive landscapes.

  • International Expansion: Global approvals could significantly augment revenues but require navigation of diverse regulatory and reimbursement environments.

  • Investment Risks: Competitive dynamics, patent challenges, and payer restrictions pose long-term price erosion threats, necessitating ongoing market monitoring.


Conclusion

NDC 72305-0112 operates within a complex ecosystem, with its pricing trajectory dictated by clinical value, patent protection, competitive pressures, and payer strategies. Stakeholders should leverage early clinical and market data, actively engage with payers, and monitor competitor developments to optimize revenue streams.

Stakeholders are advised to prepare adaptive pricing models to respond to evolving market conditions, balancing maximizing initial returns and sustaining long-term profitability.


FAQs

Q1: What factors predominantly influence the initial pricing of NDC 72305-0112?
A: Clinical efficacy, patent exclusivity, manufacturing costs, and market demand primarily determine initial drug pricing.

Q2: How does biosimilar competition impact the long-term price of this drug?
A: Biosimilar entrants typically exert downward pressure, with prices potentially declining by 20-40% within 3–5 years post-exclusivity.

Q3: What role do payers play in shaping the drug’s market price?
A: Payers influence pricing through formulary decisions, reimbursement negotiations, and value assessments, often driving prices towards cost-effective thresholds.

Q4: Are there international markets where NDC 72305-0112 could expand?
A: Yes, regulatory approvals in regions like Europe or Japan can provide additional revenue streams, though market access depends on regional approval processes and pricing negotiations.

Q5: What strategies can manufacturers employ to sustain pricing power?
A: Demonstrating superior clinical outcomes, engaging in outcome-based contracts, and securing orphan drug status are effective strategies.


Sources:

[1] US FDA Database. (2023). Product approvals.
[2] CDC Epidemiologic Data. (2022). Disease prevalence and demographic analysis.
[3] Kantar Health Reports. (2022). Reimbursement trends in specialty pharmaceuticals.
[4] IQVIA Institute. (2023). Pharmaceutical pricing and market data.
[5] IMSHealth. (2022). Biosimilar market entry and pricing impacts.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.