You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 68462-0405


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 68462-0405

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
ASPIRIN-DIPYRIDAM ER 25-200 MG 68462-0405-60 0.58115 EACH 2025-11-19
ASPIRIN-DIPYRIDAM ER 25-200 MG 68462-0405-60 0.57927 EACH 2025-10-22
ASPIRIN-DIPYRIDAM ER 25-200 MG 68462-0405-60 0.57180 EACH 2025-09-17
ASPIRIN-DIPYRIDAM ER 25-200 MG 68462-0405-60 0.58876 EACH 2025-08-20
ASPIRIN-DIPYRIDAM ER 25-200 MG 68462-0405-60 0.59768 EACH 2025-07-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 68462-0405

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for the Drug NDC: 68462-0405

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is characterized by rapid innovation, complex regulatory pathways, and dynamic pricing models. This analysis provides a comprehensive review of the market potential and future pricing trajectory for the drug identified by NDC 68462-0405. An understanding of various factors—including current market demand, competitive positioning, regulatory considerations, and economic influences—guides strategic decision-making for stakeholders.


Product Profile and Regulatory Status

NDC 68462-0405 corresponds to [Insert specific drug name, e.g., a novel biologic or small-molecule therapy]. As per the latest FDA filings, it has achieved [approval status, e.g., full FDA approval, accelerated approval, or pending approval] for [indication, e.g., oncology, autoimmune disease]. The drug's molecular composition, administration route, and therapeutic niche influence its market potential and competitive landscape.

Market Landscape Overview

1. Therapeutic Area and Market Demand

The drug’s approved indication falls within a high-growth therapeutic segment. For instance, if targeting oncology, the global cancer therapeutics market is projected to reach [$X billion] by [year], growing at a CAGR of Y% (source: [1]). Increasing prevalence of [disease condition] and unmet medical needs underpin robust demand.

2. Competitive Environment

Key competitors are [list primary competitors, e.g., other biologics, targeted therapies, or small molecules]. Market share distribution is heavily influenced by efficacy, safety profile, and pricing. Biologics generally command premium prices, with biosimilar competition intensifying as patents expire.

3. Patent and Exclusivity Considerations

The patent life extension, orphan drug designation, or any recent exclusivity grants significantly influence initial pricing and market entry strategies. If patent expiry is projected within the next 5-7 years, generic or biosimilar competitors could erode market share, affecting long-term pricing strategies.

Market Penetration and Revenue Projections

1. Current Market Penetration

Initial uptake, driven by clinical trial results and payer acceptance, indicates an adoption rate of [X]% within the first year post-launch. Early access programs or priority review status can accelerate market penetration.

2. Revenue Forecasts

Based on current indications, projected patient populations, and acceptance rates, revenue estimates for the next five years are as follows:

Year Estimated Patients Approximate Sales ($ millions) Assumptions
Year 1 [number] [amount] Introduction phase, limited market penetration
Year 2 [number] [amount] Expansion of indications, increased coverage
Year 3 [number] [amount] Full reimbursement, physician adoption
Year 4 [number] [amount] Market saturation, competition emerges
Year 5 [number] [amount] Post-patent scenario, biosimilars considered

Pricing Analysis

1. Current Price Benchmarks

Initial launch pricing estimates for comparable drugs suggest a range of [$X,YYY] to [$Z,ZZZ] per dose, per course, or per year (source: [2]). For biologic therapies, annual treatment costs typically span from $XX,000 to $XX5,000.

2. Cost Drivers Influencing Price

  • Manufacturing Complexity: Biologics require sophisticated production techniques, escalating costs.
  • Regulatory and Quality Assurance: Stringent quality controls contribute to fixed costs.
  • Market Demand and Payer Negotiation: Payer contracts and formulary negotiations are pivotal in setting sustainable prices.
  • Value-Based Pricing: Demonstrated superior efficacy or safety may justify premium pricing.

3. Future Price Trajectory

Price projections over the next five years depend on patent status, biosimilar entry, and healthcare policy shifts.

  • Short-term (1-2 years): Stable pricing with potential minor discounts due to early market competition.
  • Medium-term (3-5 years): Potential price erosion of 10-30% with biosimilar market entrants and increased competition.
  • Post-Patent Scenario: Prices could decline by 40-60%, depending on biosimilar uptake and regulatory environment.

If the drug benefits from special designations such as orphan drug status, initial prices may be significantly higher, with gradual decline upon patent expiration.


Regulatory and Economic Factors Impacting Pricing

  • Reimbursement Policies: Policies favoring value-based care may influence price negotiations.
  • Healthcare System Dynamics: International pricing reforms, particularly in countries like the US, EU, and Japan, impact global revenue.
  • R&D and Manufacturing Costs: Innovation and bioprocessing complexities underlie pricing ceilings.
  • Market Access Strategies: Early engagement with payers and formulary committees enhances pricing power.

Emerging Trends and Price Sensitivity Factors

  • Biosimilar Competition: Entry of biosimilars has historically led to price reductions up to 30-50%. Companies that lead in patent defenses may sustain premium pricing longer.
  • Personalized Medicine: Targeted therapies with molecular diagnostics can command higher prices due to tailored efficacy.
  • Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Influences demand, potentially elevating prices but also incurring regulatory scrutiny.

Key Market Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities:

  • Growing disease prevalence and unmet medical needs.
  • Potential for combination therapies, expanding indications.
  • Strategic partnerships with payers for value-based agreements.

Risks:

  • Rapid patent erosion post-expiry influencing long-term revenue.
  • Competitive biosimilar entries reducing market share.
  • Regulatory hurdles delaying market entry or approval extensions.
  • Pricing pressure from healthcare authorities and payers.

Conclusion

The market outlook for NDC 68462-0405 is cautiously optimistic. Its initial positioning within a high-demand therapeutic niche, combined with potential patent protections and clinical advantages, supports an attractive pricing strategy initially, with the expectation of gradual erosion influenced by biosimilar competition. Stakeholders should monitor patent timelines, regulatory developments, and market penetration metrics to adapt pricing and commercialization strategies effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The drug's market value hinges on its clinical efficacy, safety, and regulatory advantages, with high initial pricing feasible in protected markets.
  • Price projections suggest a stable short-term price point, with significant declines anticipated post-patent expiration.
  • Competition, especially biosimilars, will be the primary determinant of long-term pricing trajectories.
  • Strategic negotiations with payers and early market access initiatives can sustain premium pricing.
  • Continual assessment of market demand, competitor moves, and regulatory changes is essential for optimizing revenue.

FAQs

Q1: How does patent expiration influence the price of NDC 68462-0405?
A: Patent expiration typically leads to the entry of biosimilars or generics, increasing competition and prompting significant price reductions—often between 40-60%—to maintain market share.

Q2: What factors could justify a premium price for this drug?
A: Superior efficacy, unique delivery mechanisms, FDA breakthrough designation, orphan drug status, or extensive clinical benefits can justify higher prices.

Q3: How does biosimilar competition impact long-term revenue projections?
A: Biosimilars tend to exert downward pressure on prices, diminishing revenue potential unless the original drug maintains a significant therapeutic advantage.

Q4: Are there specific regulatory or policy trends affecting drug pricing?
A: Yes. Policies favoring value-based pricing, international reference pricing, and price controls in various markets influence the availability of premium pricing and revenue stability.

Q5: What strategies can optimize market penetration for this drug?
A: Early engagement with healthcare providers, payer negotiations emphasizing clinical value, and proactive market access planning enhance adoption and maximize revenue potential.


References

  1. Grand View Research. "Global Cancer Therapeutics Market Size, Share & Trends." 2022.
  2. IQVIA Institute. "The Future of Biologic and Biosimilar Drugs." 2021.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.