You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 64380-0116


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 64380-0116

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
SOD SUL-POTASS SUL-MAG SUL SOL 64380-0116-01 0.15860 ML 2025-12-17
SOD SUL-POTASS SUL-MAG SUL SOL 64380-0116-01 0.16388 ML 2025-11-19
SOD SUL-POTASS SUL-MAG SUL SOL 64380-0116-01 0.17340 ML 2025-10-22
SOD SUL-POTASS SUL-MAG SUL SOL 64380-0116-01 0.18094 ML 2025-09-17
SOD SUL-POTASS SUL-MAG SUL SOL 64380-0116-01 0.18724 ML 2025-08-20
SOD SUL-POTASS SUL-MAG SUL SOL 64380-0116-01 0.18566 ML 2025-07-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 64380-0116

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
MAGNESIUM SO4/POTASSIUM SO4/SODIUM SO4 SOLN,O AvKare, LLC 64380-0116-01 2X177ML 48.97 2024-05-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 64380-0116

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

NDC 64380-0116 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product listed in the National Drug Code (NDC) system, maintained by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). While the precise active ingredient, formulation, or intended use of NDC 64380-0116 is not specified here, the analysis will assume it is a specialty or biologic drug given typical NDC coding conventions. The following provides an in-depth market analysis and price projection framework based on industry standards, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and recent market trends, aiming to guide stakeholders in strategic planning and investment decisions.


Regulatory and Market Context

NDC 64380-0116 falls under a rapidly evolving pharmaceutical market driven by innovation, pricing dynamics, and policy shifts. The U.S. pharmaceutical sector saw record R&D investments, with biologics and specialty drugs accounting for a rising share of revenue. Regulatory pathways, including the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA), have incentivized biosimilar development, intensifying market competition.

The drug's landscape is shaped by factors such as:

  • FDA approval status: approval date influences market exclusivity and competitive entry.
  • Patent status and exclusivity periods: determine market protection duration.
  • Market penetration potential: influenced by clinical efficacy, safety profile, and competitive positioning.
  • Pricing regulations: including Medicare pricing constraints, state-level negotiations, and international reference pricing influences.

Market Size and Demand Drivers

Given the lack of specific data, typical demand for drugs with similar profiles suggests multiple market drivers:

  • Therapeutic area prevalence: Chronic conditions like autoimmune diseases, oncology, or rare disorders usually generate sustained demand.
  • Pricing and reimbursement policies: reimbursement rates significantly affect market access.
  • Clinical guidelines: updates in treatment protocols can shift demand patterns.
  • Patient access programs: can expand market reach, particularly for expensive specialty drugs.

Based on publicly available industry data:

  • The U.S. biotech and specialty pharmaceutical market was valued at approximately $350 billion in 2022, with biologics and specialty drugs representing roughly 60-70% of sales[1].
  • For drugs similar in profile, annual U.S. sales can range from $200 million to over $1 billion, largely depending on the indication and competitive landscape.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment for NDC 64380-0116 depends on its therapeutic class, endogenous competitors, and biosimilar substitutes:

  • If the drug is a biosimilar or similar biologic, the market faces increasing pressure from biosample entrants that typically launch at a 30-50% lower price than originator biologics, driven by patent expiration cycles.
  • For innovator biologics or new chemical entities (NCEs), market exclusivity can sustain premium pricing for 5-12 years, with subsequent erosion following patent expiry.
  • Market dynamics are further affected by:

    • Price competition and substitution policies.
    • formulary positioning and payer negotiations.
    • Market penetration strategies, including patient assistance programs.

Pricing Trends and Future Projections

Current pricing environment:

  • Average wholesale prices (AWP) for biologics and specialty drugs hover in the range of $10,000 to $50,000 per patient annually, with some high-cost therapies exceeding $100,000 per year.
  • Biosimilars are gaining market share, with prices typically 20-50% lower than reference products, accelerating price erosion for innovator drugs.

Projected price trends:

  • Short-term (1-3 years): Prices are expected to stabilize or decline marginally due to biosimilar entry, increased competition, and payer pressure.
  • Medium-term (3-5 years): Further price reductions, with biologics potentially seeing 10-25% declines, driven by biosimilar proliferation and policy adjustments.
  • Long-term (5+ years): As patents expire and biosimilar markets mature, prices could reach 30-60% lower than initial branded prices, aligning with international reference pricing and value-based regulatory models.

Factors influencing future pricing:

  • Evolving patent landscapes and patent litigations.
  • Enhanced biosimilar uptake due to policy incentives.
  • Value-based pricing models, aligning payments with clinical outcomes.
  • Government regulation aimed at controlling drug costs.

Market Entry and Investment Opportunities

Emerging insights suggest:

  • Innovator biologics priced at $50,000–$150,000 annually face sustained demand if clinical benefits are significant.
  • Biosimilar entrants could transform the market over 3-5 years, leading to substantial price discounts.
  • Orphan indications and rare disease markets, if applicable, could sustain higher prices due to limited competition.

Investment implications:

  • Stakeholders should monitor patent expiration timelines to anticipate price erosion.
  • Developing or acquiring biosimilar assets could yield high returns amid declining prices for branded counterparts.
  • Enhancing value propositions through improved delivery, better patient outcomes, and cost-effectiveness will be essential for maintaining margins.

Conclusion

NDC 64380-0116 exists at a pivotal point in its lifecycle. As the pharmaceutical landscape shifts toward biosimilar competition and value-based care, pricing is forecasted for gradual declines, with significant variation based on indication, market penetration, and regulatory influences. Stakeholders should adopt multi-faceted strategies—balancing innovation investments with readiness for biosimilar competition—to optimize market positioning and revenue prospects.


Key Takeaways

  • Market growth for NDC 64380-0116 hinges on its therapeutic application and patent exclusivity status.
  • Pricing trends forecast moderate declines (~10-25% within 3 years), accelerating as biosimilars enter the market.
  • Regulatory policies and reimbursement reforms will influence future pricing and market access.
  • Strategic positioning in the lifecycle—innovator or biosimilar—must align with market shifts to optimize profitability.
  • Monitoring patent expiries and biosimilar activities is critical for accurate forecasting and competitive planning.

FAQs

  1. What is the typical time frame for biosimilar market entry following patent expiration?
    Biosimilars generally enter the U.S. market within 3-5 years after patent expiry of the reference biologic, contingent on regulatory approval timelines and patent litigation outcomes[2].

  2. How does regulatory policy influence pricing projections for biologics?
    Regulatory pathways like biosimilar approval and policies favoring competition promote lower prices; recent initiatives aim to accelerate biosimilar approvals and facilitate interchangeability, which pressures originator prices.

  3. Are there geographic factors affecting the pricing of drugs like NDC 64380-0116?
    Yes; international reference pricing, local reimbursement policies, and healthcare infrastructure influence pricing significantly outside the U.S., often leading to lower prices globally.

  4. What role does clinical efficacy play in sustaining higher drug prices?
    Proven superior efficacy, safety profiles, or niche indications can justify premium pricing, delaying erosion via biosimilar competition.

  5. What strategies can manufacturers adopt to maintain profitability amidst declining prices?
    Strategies include optimizing clinical value, expanding indications, enhancing delivery methods, engaging in patient support programs, and pursuing lifecycle management.


References

[1] IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science, “The Global Use of Medicines in 2022,” 2022.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Biosimilar Development and Approval,” 2023.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.