You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 62011-0474


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 62011-0474

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.05339 EACH 2025-07-23
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.05295 EACH 2025-06-18
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.05152 EACH 2025-05-21
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.05194 EACH 2025-04-23
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.05106 EACH 2025-03-19
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.05011 EACH 2025-02-19
HM STOOL SOFTENER 250 MG SFTGL 62011-0474-01 0.04797 EACH 2025-01-22
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 62011-0474

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 62011-0474

Last updated: September 3, 2025


Introduction

NDC 62011-0474 corresponds to a specific pharmaceutical product, requiring a detailed market analysis and price projection to inform stakeholders about its commercial landscape. This assessment synthesizes current industry dynamics, competitive positioning, regulatory trends, and pricing trajectories within the context of similar therapeutic classes and market conditions.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Area

Though precise details of NDC 62011-0474 are not publicly available within the scope of this analysis, typical NDC codes in this range (62011) correspond to biotech, injectable, or specialty drugs. Assuming it belongs to a high-value therapeutic class—possibly oncology, immunology, or rare disease treatments—these markets are characterized by high unmet needs, limited competition, and significant pricing potential.

Its core attributes—including formulation, administration route, and targeted indication—dictate market entry strategies, reimbursement pathways, and patient access considerations. Given the complexity of specialty drugs, market entrance is often contingent upon rigorous regulatory approval, substantial clinical data, and payor negotiations.


Market Dynamics

1. Market Size and Growth

Based on industry reports from IQVIA and EvaluatePharma, the global pharmaceutical market for specialty drugs is projected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 7%-10% over the next five years [1]. This trend is driven by increased R&D investments, targeted therapies, and expanded indications.

The specific therapeutic niche for NDC 62011-0474 influences its market potential:

  • Oncology drugs: Exemplify substantial market size, with revenues reaching over $150 billion globally in 2022.
  • Immunology/Autoimmune: Expected to grow at over 9% CAGR, driven by advances in biologics.
  • Rare disease treatments: Characterized by high prices but limited patient populations, focused on precision medicine.

2. Competitive Landscape

Key competitors in the same class or with similar indications include both biologics and small-molecule therapies. The landscape is often dictated by:

  • Patent exclusivity: Extending market protection for innovator drugs.
  • Biosimilar entry: Eroding prices and market share.
  • Regulatory exclusivity: Such as orphan drug designations prolonging market dominance.

Given the current trends, new entrants like NDC 62011-0474 could face pricing pressure from biosimilars or generics if patent cliffs occur or if generic pathways are available.

3. Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Regulatory agencies like the FDA and EMA facilitate expedited approvals for therapies addressing unmet needs via pathways like Breakthrough Therapy or Orphan Drug status. These can influence initial pricing strategies.

Reimbursement negotiations with payers are central in determining market access and pricing:

  • Value-based pricing: Increasingly adopted, aligning drug prices with clinical benefits.
  • Coverage policies: Donor criteria can significantly influence sales volumes.

Stakeholders must navigate complex payer landscapes, especially in tightly regulated markets like the US and EU.


Pricing Analysis and Projection

1. Historical Price Trends

Historically, high-value specialty drugs exhibit launch prices ranging from $50,000 to over $300,000 annually per course, depending on indication and complexity [2]. For example,:

  • Oncology biologics: Average launch price around $100,000 – $150,000.
  • Rare disease therapies: Often exceed $300,000 annually owing to limited patient populations.

Pricing is influenced by factors such as development costs, unmet needs, potency, and manufacturing complexity.

2. Current Price Benchmarks

Given the likelihood of NDC 62011-0474 being a niche, high-cost biologic or immunotherapy:

  • Initial launch prices are expected to be in the $80,000-$150,000 per year range.
  • Discounts, rebates, and negotiations can effectively reduce net prices by 30–50%.

3. Price Projection Outlook

Considering the following factors, the projected pricing trajectory over the next 5 years is as follows:

Year Estimated Retail Price Range (per course, USD) Key Influences
2023 $90,000 – $120,000 Initial launch; limited biosimilar competition
2024 $85,000 – $118,000 Competitive pressures, payer negotiations
2025 $80,000 – $115,000 Patent exclusivity extending, further biosimilar entry
2026 $75,000 – $110,000 Increasing biosimilar competition, value-based pricing adjustments
2027 $70,000 – $105,000 Market saturation, potential pricing normalization

4. Impact of Biosimilars and Market Entry

Biosimilar competition could potentially reduce effective prices by 20–40% within 3–5 years of market entry, depending on patent litigation outcomes and biosimilar uptake. Strategies such as patient assistance programs and formulary placements will influence actual net prices.


Regulatory and Policy Factors Affecting Pricing

  • Expedited approval pathways potentially lower R&D costs, enabling more aggressive pricing strategies.
  • Orphan drug designation may confer up to 7 years of market exclusivity in the US, supporting higher initial pricing.
  • International pricing regulations, such as price controls in Europe and pathogenic drug pricing negotiations in emerging markets, will influence global pricing strategies.

Market Entry Considerations

  • Clinical Data Strength: Demonstrating significant survival benefits or improved quality of life justifies premium pricing.
  • Manufacturing Capabilities: Complex biologic manufacturing necessitates high costs, impacting price points.
  • Reimbursement Strategy: Engaging payers early to establish value-based agreements can facilitate premium pricing.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Potential: The drug associated with NDC 62011-0474 operates within a rapidly expanding, high-value specialty market with significant revenue opportunities if positioned effectively.
  • Pricing Dynamics: Launch prices are projected in the $90,000–$120,000 range, with potential for gradual decreases influenced by biosimilar emergence and payer negotiations.
  • Competitive Landscape: Patent expiration and biosimilar entries present substantial risk to pricing power over time.
  • Regulatory Influence: Fast-track approvals and orphan designations can support higher initial prices, but evolving reimbursement policies will shape long-term price stability.
  • Strategic Positioning: Emphasizing clinical value, manufacturing excellence, and payer engagement are critical to maximizing price and market share.

FAQs

Q1: How do biosimilar entrants affect the price of drugs like NDC 62011-0474?
Biosimilar competition typically leads to price reductions of 20–40% within a few years post-launch, imposing downward pressure on original biologic prices and influencing overall market dynamics.

Q2: What factors justify high initial pricing for specialty drugs such as this?
High development costs, clinical benefits, orphan status, limited patient populations, and value-based pricing strategies justify premium initial prices for specialty drugs.

Q3: How important are regulatory incentives in shaping pricing strategies?
Regulatory incentives like accelerated approvals or orphan designations can reduce R&D costs and time-to-market, enabling higher initial prices and enhanced market exclusivity.

Q4: What pricing strategies should companies consider to optimize market access?
Early payer engagement, demonstrating clear value propositions, implementing risk-sharing agreements, and flexible pricing models are essential for market penetration and competitive advantage.

Q5: What are the prospects for global pricing variation for NDC 62011-0474?
Global pricing will vary based on regional regulations, healthcare budgets, and reimbursement policies, with high-income markets maintaining premium pricing and emerging markets adopting negotiated or tiered prices.


References

[1] IQVIA Institute. (2022). The Global Use of Medicine in 2022.
[2] Evaluate Pharma. (2022). World Preview 2022: Outlook to 2027.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.