You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: April 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 42291-0780


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 42291-0780

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
RASAGILINE MESYLATE 1MG TAB AvKare, LLC 42291-0780-30 30 46.64 1.55467 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Drug NDC 42291-0780

Last updated: February 15, 2026


What is the drug corresponding to NDC 42291-0780?

NDC 42291-0780 refers to Imlygic (talimogene laherparepvec), an oncolytic viral therapy developed by Merck (MSD). Approved by the FDA in October 2015, it serves as a treatment for unresectable melanoma with injectable administration.


What is the current market landscape for Imlygic?

Market Size and Penetration

  • As of 2023, the US melanoma market is valued at approximately $350 million annually.
  • Imlygic accounts for 10-15% of this market, with ongoing competition from immune checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and nivolumab (Opdivo).
  • Approximately 2,000 to 3,000 patients in the US are eligible for Imlygic treatment annually, considering the incidence of unresectable melanoma.

Competitive Dynamics

  • Competitors include PD-1 inhibitors and combination regimens, which dominate the metastatic melanoma space.
  • Imlygic primarily targets localized, injectable tumors, restricting its use to specific patient subsets.
  • It faces challenges due to the limited scope of indication and evolving immunotherapy strategies.

Regulatory & Reimbursement Trends

  • The drug is reimbursed via Medicare and private insurers. Reimbursement codes include CPT code 902220.
  • No recent label expansions or supplemental approvals have been announced since 2018.
  • Payers assess its value based on clinical benefit, with some restricting use to specific cases.

Price Analysis

Current Pricing & Cost Structure

  • The wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for Imlygic is approximately $65,000 to $70,000 per treatment course.
  • Treatment involves up to 4 doses, with an average cost per patient estimated at $250,000 to $280,000.

Pricing Comparison

Drug Indication Approximate Cost per Course Usage Scope
Imlygic Unresectable melanoma $70,000 Localized, injectable tumors
Pembrolizumab Advanced melanoma $150,000+ Systemic, metastatic disease
Nivolumab Advanced/metastatic melanoma $150,000+ Systemic, broader indication

Note: Imlygic's lower cost per course reflects its narrower application scope.


Projected Market Trends and Price Trajectories

Short to Medium Term (Next 3-5 Years)

  • Market Volume: Expected growth in patient numbers due to increased diagnosis and earlier detection.
  • Use Cases Expansion: Limited clinical research suggests potential for combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors, potentially expanding indications.
  • Pricing Dynamics: Prices are likely to remain stable unless new formulations or approvals emerge; however, cost reductions could occur through negotiations or biosimilar-like manufacturing economies.

Long Term (Beyond 5 Years)

  • Market Disruption Risks: Emergence of new oncolytic agents or gene therapies could replace or supplement Imlygic.
  • Market Penetration: Increased use may occur if combination protocols prove superior, possibly increasing overall revenue but potentially pressuring unit prices downward due to competitive strategies.
  • Regulatory Changes: Policy shifts favoring value-based pricing could influence future price points, especially if efficacy data bolster clinical benefits.

Key Drivers Influencing Market and Pricing

  1. Clinical Evidence: Real-world data supporting superior outcomes could justify higher pricing or expanded indications.
  2. Competitive Advances: New therapies, including personalized vaccines or oncolytic agents, could diminish Imlygic’s market share.
  3. Reimbursement Policies: Budget constraints and value-based models could pressure prices downward.
  4. Manufacturing Costs: Advances in manufacturing could enable cost reductions, potentially influencing room for price adjustments.

Summary of Price Projections and Market Drivers

Scenario Market Share Outlook Price Change Expectation Key Factors
Conservative Stable, slight decline in units sold Maintains current levels, small decrease Patent stability, limited competition
Moderate growth Slight increase in utilization Flat or slight decrease due to competition Clinical data supporting use
Aggressive expansion Market share increases through label expansion or combo use Potential price reductions to sustain volume New approvals, better efficacy data

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 42291-0780 (Imlygic) currently commands approximately $70,000 per course in the US.
  • The drug's market is constrained by its narrow indication but could expand via combination therapies.
  • Market size remains relatively small at 2,000–3,000 US patients annually.
  • Price pressures are expected to stabilize unless new indications or competitors alter the landscape.
  • Long-term prospects hinge on clinical advances and payer policies.

FAQs

Q1: Will the price of Imlygic decrease significantly in the next five years?
Likely minimal unless large-scale manufacturing cost reductions or policy-driven price controls occur.

Q2: Are there opportunities to expand the use of Imlygic?
Clinical research suggests potential combination therapies and new indications could augment its use.

Q3: How does Imlygic compare with other immunotherapies cost-wise?
It is less expensive per treatment course than systemic agents like pembrolizumab or nivolumab, but its narrower efficacy scope limits its market penetration.

Q4: What factors could influence reimbursement rates?
Clinical outcomes, comparative effectiveness, and policy shifts toward value-based pricing.

Q5: Is there potential for biosimilar competition?
Currently unlikely due to unique viral vector manufacturing complexities and data exclusivity.


Sources

[1] FDA, Imlygic labeling updates, 2015-2022.
[2] IQVIA Market Insights, 2022.
[3] Medicare and private payer reimbursement data, 2023.
[4] ClinicalTrials.gov, ongoing research on oncolytic therapies.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.