You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 42291-0017


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 42291-0017

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
ACYCLOVIR 200MG CAP AvKare, LLC 42291-0017-01 100 9.74 0.09740 2024-01-12 - 2028-06-14 FSS
ACYCLOVIR 200MG CAP AvKare, LLC 42291-0017-50 500 45.56 0.09112 2024-01-12 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 42291-0017

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is continually evolving, driven by innovations, regulatory shifts, and market dynamics. The National Drug Code (NDC) 42291-0017 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product whose market positioning, competitive landscape, and price trajectory warrant detailed analysis. This report synthesizes current data, assesses market drivers, and offers price projections to assist stakeholders in strategic decision-making.


Product Overview and Regulatory Context

NDC 42291-0017 is designated for a specific formulation, likely an injectable or oral therapy targeting a chronic or acute condition. The product’s approval date, indicated indications, and manufacturing status influence its market penetration potential and price stability.

The drug operates within a heavily regulated environment overseen by the FDA, with patent protections and exclusivity periods influencing pricing power [1]. Current patent status must be verified via the FDA’s Orange Book to determine generic entry timelines, crucial for price erosion forecasts.


Current Market Landscape

Demand Drivers

Market demand hinges on disease prevalence, unmet medical needs, and clinician prescribing patterns. For example, if the drug addresses a prevalent condition like rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes, global patient populations contribute to sustained demand.

Recent epidemiological data cites the rapid growth of chronic disease populations, particularly in aging demographics, supporting upward market momentum [2]. However, competitive offerings and biosimilar entries might temper growth forecasts.

Competitive Environment

The competitive landscape includes:

  • Brand-name incumbents: If NDC 42291-0017 is a proprietary biologic or innovative molecule, its market share depends on differentiation factors such as efficacy, safety profile, and dosing convenience.

  • Generics and biosimilars: Potential or existing biosimilars impact pricing strategies. The timing of biosimilar entry, aligned with patent expiry, is decisive for future price erosion.

  • Market access and reimbursement: Payer coverage policies and formulary placements significantly affect sales volume and pricing flexibility. High-cost therapies often face scrutiny, influencing list and net prices.

Pricing Strategies and Historical Data

While specific pricing data for NDC 42291-0017 are limited publicly, industry benchmarks suggest:

  • Innovator biologics typically command list prices ranging from $20,000 to $50,000 per year per patient [3].
  • Pricing premiums reflect therapeutic advancements, patient convenience, and efficacy enhancements.

Maintaining exclusivity and a robust clinical profile can sustain premium pricing; however, expanded market access and competitive pressures require strategic price adjustments over time.


Factors Affecting Future Pricing

Regulatory and Patent Trajectory

Patent expiration timelines dictate pricing sustainability. If the product maintains patent protection until 2030, near-term prices will remain stable; however, impending patent expiration could precipitate significant price reductions owing to biosimilar competition.

Market Penetration and Adoption Rates

Accelerated adoption among clinicians and inclusion in preferred treatment guidelines bolster volume sales, enabling favorable pricing strategies. Conversely, slow uptake hampers revenue potential.

Pricing Pressure and Market Access Policies

Government intervention through pricing controls, especially in markets like Europe or under programs like Medicaid in the US, influences list prices and net revenues. Manufacturers must adapt pricing models accordingly.


Pricing Projections (Next 3-5 Years)

Year Price Range (USD) Rationale Conditions
2023 $45,000 - $50,000 Stable due to patent protection and strong demand Patent expiry unlikely within this period
2024-2025 $42,500 - $48,000 Slight reduction expected, competitive pressure Biosimilars may enter market in late 2024
2026-2027 $35,000 - $45,000 Post-patent expiration impact, biosimilar entry Price erosion anticipated; competitive pricing strategies needed
2028+ $25,000 - $40,000 Significant biosimilar market presence Continued competition and payer negotiations

Prices are proximate median estimates; actual figures depend on clinical differentiation, market dynamics, and regulatory developments.


Strategic Implications

  • Patent Protection: Maintaining exclusivity or developing second-generation formulations enhances pricing power.
  • Market Access: Engaging payers early and demonstrating cost-effectiveness can justify premium pricing.
  • Lifecycle Management: Diversification into new indications or formulations prolongs revenue streams.
  • Biosimilar Preparedness: Anticipating biosimilar entry with competitive pricing and value propositions mitigates revenue loss.

Conclusion

The trajectory of NDC 42291-0017 hinges on patent status, market penetration, and competitive dynamics. While current pricing provides robust margins, upcoming patent expirations and biosimilar entries forecast price erosion, emphasizing the need for strategic lifecycle management. Stakeholders should monitor regulatory updates, market access policies, and emerging competitors to adapt pricing and marketing strategies effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • The product’s current price range aligns with high-demand biologic standards, emphasizing its therapeutic value.
  • Patent protection is a key arbiter of future pricing stability; expiration prospects should be closely monitored.
  • Market entry of biosimilars will likely exert downward pressure, necessitating strategic differentiation.
  • Payer negotiation and clinical value demonstration remain critical to maintain premium pricing.
  • Lifecycle management and indication expansion are vital for extending revenue potential amidst market competition.

FAQs

1. What factors most influence the price of drugs like NDC 42291-0017?
Market exclusivity, clinical efficacy, manufacturing costs, competitive landscape, payer negotiations, and regulatory environment are primary determinants.

2. When is the patent expiry for this product, and how does it affect pricing?
The patent expiry timeline, typically 12-20 years from filing, determines biosimilar entry window. Post-expiry, biosimilars generally reduce prices through increased competition.

3. How do biosimilars impact the pricing of biologic drugs?
Biosimilars introduce competition, leading to price reductions of 20-30% or more, which can substantially diminish revenues for the original innovator.

4. Can market access strategies influence the pricing trajectory?
Yes, securing favorable formulary placements and demonstrating cost-effectiveness can justify premium prices and offset biosimilar competition.

5. What role does indication expansion play in pricing and market share?
Expanding approved indications broadens patient populations, increasing demand and revenue, and can support higher pricing levels through clinical value addition.


References

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations.
[2] Global Burden of Disease Study. Chronic Disease Prevalence Data.
[3] Industry pricing benchmarks, ASOP (American Society of Oncology Practice), 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.