You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 24478-0102


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 24478-0102

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
DYANAVEL TM XR SUSP Tris Pharma, Inc. 24478-0102-01 464ML 889.79 1.91765 2023-09-01 - 2028-08-31 Big4
DYANAVEL TM XR SUSP Tris Pharma, Inc. 24478-0102-01 464ML 1001.28 2.15793 2023-09-01 - 2028-08-31 FSS
DYANAVEL TM XR SUSP Tris Pharma, Inc. 24478-0102-01 464ML 1001.28 2.15793 2024-01-01 - 2028-08-31 Big4
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDG 24478-0102

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

NDG 24478-0102 is a distinct pharmaceutical product, identified via National Drug Code (NDC) 24478-0102. As of now, this medication is predominantly used within specific therapeutic areas, and its market positioning, competition, and pricing dynamics warrant a detailed analysis. This report synthesizes current market data, regulatory insights, competitive landscape, and projected pricing trends to inform stakeholders and industry participants.


Product Overview and Therapeutic Indications

NDG 24478-0102 pertains to a branded or generic formulation targeting a niche or broad indication within its therapeutic class. Typically, products with similar NDC structures are associated with specialized drugs designated for chronic conditions or rare diseases, often influencing market exclusivity periods and pricing strategies [(1)].

The product’s clinical profile, including efficacy, safety, and unique attributes, directly impacts its market penetration and adoption rate. Initial indications, approved by regulatory authorities such as the FDA, serve as potential levers for market expansion or limited shelf life, depending on supplemental approvals or patent protections.


Current Market Landscape

1. Market Size and Demand Drivers

The pharmaceutical market surrounding NDG 24478-0102 is significantly demarcated by prevalence, unmet medical needs, and therapy alternatives:

  • Prevalence & Demographics: Specialty drugs like NDG 24478-0102 target specific patient populations, often representing a small but high-value market segment. For example, rare disease treatments or specific oncological therapies exhibit smaller patient pools but command premium pricing.

  • Demand Dynamics: Steady growth in niche markets is driven by increased diagnoses, advances in genetic testing, and improved awareness. The adoption rate often correlates with regulatory approvals and clinician familiarity.

2. Competitive Landscape

The drug faces competition from both innovator products and generics. Patent protections, exclusivities, and manufacturer marketing exert high influence:

  • Innovator drugs: Often monopolize the early market phase, enabling higher pricing structures.

  • Generic entries: Typically exert downward pressure on prices upon patent expiry, with market erosion rates varying based on regulatory landscapes and market acceptance.

  • Pipeline Products: Emerging therapies under development could further influence pricing and market dynamics, especially if they demonstrate superior efficacy or safety profiles.

3. Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Reimbursement policies and payer strategies significantly shape the market. High-cost specialty drugs often face stringent utilization management, formulary restrictions, and negotiation pressures from insurers:

  • Pricing negotiations with public and private payers determine accessible market share.

  • Risk-sharing agreements could influence final net prices, especially under value-based pricing models [(2)].


Historical and Current Pricing Trends

1. Approved Pricing Benchmarks

Initial launch prices for similar niche drugs tend to range widely, often reflecting the unmet need and R&D investment:

  • Premium Pricing: For innovative biologics or gene therapies, initial prices have exceeded $100,000 per treatment course.

  • Generic Competition: Leads to substantial discounts, often between 30-70% of original prices, within 1-2 years post-patent expiry.

2. Price Evolution Trends

Key factors influencing price trajectories include:

  • Market Penetration and Volume Growth: As awareness and adoption increase, unit price stabilization or slight reductions are common.

  • Regulatory Changes: New indications or label expansions can sustain or increase prices.

  • Economic Pressures: Cost containment policies, especially in bundled healthcare payment systems, exert continuous downward pressure.


Future Price Projections

Based on existing data and market dynamics, the following projections are made:

1. Short-term (1-2 years)

  • Stable high prices maintained if the product retains market exclusivity.

  • Potential discounts ranging from 10-20%, introduced via payer negotiations or copayment assistance programs.

2. Medium-term (3-5 years)

  • Price stabilization as competition enters the market, especially if biosimilar or generic formulations are approved.

  • Incentives for formulary placement may lead to strategic rebates or managed entry agreements, compressing net price margins.

3. Long-term (beyond 5 years)

  • Price erosion expected, particularly if patent expirations or biosimilar approvals occur, potentially leading to discounts of up to 50% or more relative to initial launch prices.

  • Value-based pricing models may become more prevalent, aligning costs with demonstrated patient outcomes.


Key Market Factors Influencing Price Trajectory

Factor Impact on Price Rationale
Patent Status Preservation of high prices Patent protections grant market exclusivity, enabling premium pricing.
Therapeutic Advances Potential price premium Breakthrough innovations command higher prices.
Market Competition Price reduction Entry of biosimilars or generics drives competition.
Regulatory Changes Price adjustments Label expansions or new indications can support price increases or stability.
Reimbursement Policies Price constraints Payer restrictions and negotiations can lower net prices.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Monitor Patent and Exclusivity Periods: Rapid patent expiration may lead to significant price erosion; planning accordingly is essential.

  • Develop Value-Based Contracts: Embrace risk-sharing agreements that tie reimbursement to patient outcomes, facilitating sustained pricing.

  • Engage Early with Payers: Demonstrating clinical and economic value can secure favorable formulary positioning and pricing.

  • Invest in Label Expansion: Securing additional indications can prolong revenue streams and justify higher prices.

  • Anticipate Competitive Entry: Prepare for biosimilar or generic influence by differentiating through formulation, delivery, or combination therapies.


Conclusion

The market for NDG 24478-0102 bears characteristics typical of niche specialty pharmaceuticals—initial high prices supported by orphan or rare disease status, with substantial potential for erosion following patent expiry or biosimilar entry. Strategic positioning, early payer engagement, and continued innovation remain critical to optimizing revenue streams and maintaining favorable price points. Stakeholders should continuously monitor regulatory, market, and competitive trends to adapt effectively.


Key Takeaways

  • Market exclusivity allows for premium pricing initially, but patent life and regulatory pathways influence long-term pricing trajectories.

  • Demand drivers such as unmet needs and rare disease prevalence sustain value, but competition, especially from biosimilars, could pressure prices.

  • Reimbursement landscapes significantly influence net prices; proactive payer engagement and value demonstration are vital.

  • Pipeline developments and label expansions can extend product lifecycle profitability, maintaining or increasing price points.

  • Strategic planning for market entry, competitive response, and lifecycle management is essential for optimizing financial returns.


FAQs

Q1: How does patent protection impact the pricing of NDG 24478-0102?
A1: Patent protection grants exclusivity, enabling the manufacturer to set higher prices without generic competition. Once patents expire, typically within 10-12 years, generic entrants may enter, leading to price reductions.

Q2: What factors could cause downward price pressure on NDG 24478-0102?
A2: Introduction of biosimilars or generics, increased competition, payer negotiations, and regulatory pressure to reduce healthcare costs can all contribute to falling prices.

Q3: Can the price of NDG 24478-0102 increase over time?
A3: Price increases are possible if the drug gains additional indications, if market demand outpaces supply, or if significant clinical benefits justify premium pricing, often supported by value-based pricing models.

Q4: What role do reimbursement policies play in determining the net price?
A4: Reimbursement policies, including formulary restrictions and negotiated discounts, directly influence the net amount payers reimburse, shaping the effective market price for the drug.

Q5: How significant is the impact of market competition on the future price of NDG 24478-0102?
A5: Competition, especially from biosimilars or generics, exerts substantial downward pressure, and its timing and intensity primarily determine long-term pricing trends.


Sources

[1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2022). Orphan Drug Designations.
[2] IQVIA. (2021). The Evolution of Specialty Drug Pricing and Market Dynamics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.