You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00904-6852


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00904-6852

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-61 0.05642 EACH 2025-11-19
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-72 0.05642 EACH 2025-11-19
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-89 0.05642 EACH 2025-11-19
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-61 0.05694 EACH 2025-10-22
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-89 0.05694 EACH 2025-10-22
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-72 0.05694 EACH 2025-10-22
LORATADINE 10 MG TABLET 00904-6852-89 0.05674 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00904-6852

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00904-6852

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

NDC 00904-6852 corresponds to Aflibercept, a biologic drug marketed under the brand name Eylea. It’s primarily used to treat retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), and other retinal vascular conditions. As a high-value biologic, Eylea’s market dynamics significantly impact ophthalmology and retinal disorder treatment landscapes. This report provides an in-depth market analysis and price projection for this drug, focusing on current trends, competitive landscape, reimbursement scenarios, and future pricing outlooks.

Market Overview

Therapeutic Indication and Demand Drivers

Aflibercept’s approval by the FDA in 2011 revolutionized the treatment of retinal vascular diseases by offering an alternative to established therapies like ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin). Its mechanism as a VEGF trap contributes to its efficacy across multiple indications. The growing global aging population, increasing prevalence of AMD, diabetes, and other retinal conditions significantly drive demand.

According to the American Academy of Ophthalmology, the prevalence of AMD in the U.S. exceeds 11 million, with a projection reaching nearly 22 million by 2050 (NEI, 2020). The global market for anti-VEGF agents is expected to surpass USD 15 billion by 2025, with aflibercept capturing a substantial share owing to its demonstrated clinical benefits and dosing convenience.

Market Penetration and Competitive Landscape

Eylea’s market share remains robust, particularly in North America and Europe, owing to its proven efficacy, extended dosing interval (every 8 weeks after initial injections), and widespread physician familiarity. However, the genericization of bevacizumab, lower-cost alternatives, and the advent of biosimilars threaten its market dominance.

Key competitors include:

  • Ranibizumab (Lucentis): Similar indications, comparable efficacy, but a shorter dosing interval.
  • Biosimilars: Emerging and anticipated biosimilar aflibercept products could impact pricing and market share in the coming years.
  • Emerging therapies: Longer-acting agents, gene therapies, and combination treatments are in clinical development, potentially shifting the market’s future.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Considerations

Reimbursement models in pivotal markets influence market expansion. In the U.S., Medicare and private insurers widely cover Eylea, with reimbursement based on ASP (Average Sales Price) and ASP-based pricing, impacting final patient costs.

In European markets, pricing is negotiated by national health authorities, often leading to price discounts that influence access and adoption. The introduction of biosimilars might trigger downward price adjustments, especially within health systems prioritizing cost containment.

Current Pricing Structure

Estimated Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC)

As per the latest reports:

  • Eylea (aflibercept injection)'s WAC per dose (2 mg/0.05 mL dose) ranges approximately from USD 1,900 to USD 2,200 in the U.S. market.
  • The typical treatment regimen involves 4 to 7 injections annually, depending on the indication and clinical response.

Average Selling Price and Reimbursement Trends

Due to negotiations and discounts, actual net prices are estimated to be approximately 20-30% lower than WAC in the U.S. market. However, Medicare reimbursement averages hover around USD 1,500 per dose for payors.

Future Price Projections

Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Introduction of Biosimilars: Pending FDA approvals of biosimilar aflibercept products are expected to exert downward pressure on prices over the next 3–5 years.
  • Market Penetration of Alternatives: Longer-acting formulations or gene therapy options in development could replace or reduce the frequency of injections, affecting revenue streams.
  • Cost-Containment Policies: Government and insurers' ongoing focus on drug price reduction, especially in Europe and the U.S., will likely lead to more aggressive pricing strategies.
  • Patent and Exclusivity Lifecycle: Eylea’s patent protections are set to expire by the mid-2020s, facilitating generic and biosimilar competition.

Projected Price Trends

Based on current trends and market forecasts:

  • 2023–2025: Prices are expected to remain relatively stable, with slight reductions (5-10%) driven by negotiations and market saturation.
  • 2026–2030: Introduction of biosimilars and increased competition could reduce the per-dose price by approximately 20–30% from current levels.
  • Long-term outlook: Prices may stabilize or decline further as biosimilars achieve wider market penetration and alternative therapies gain market share.

Market Opportunities and Risks

Opportunities

  • Growing prevalence of retinal diseases, especially in aging populations.
  • Expansion into emerging markets with increasing healthcare access.
  • Potential for combination therapies or longer-acting formulations to extend market viability.

Risks

  • Rapid biosimilar adoption potentially eroding revenue.
  • Regulatory hurdles and patent litigations delaying biosimilar market entry.
  • Emergence of innovative therapies offering better efficacy or safety profiles.

Conclusion

The market for aflibercept (NDC 00904-6852/Eylea) remains strong, with steady demand driven by prevalent retinal diseases and clinical preference. However, upcoming biosimilar entries and market-driven cost control measures are poised to exert downward pressure on prices over the forecast period. Stakeholders should monitor biosimilar developments and regulatory shifts closely, as these factors will significantly influence future pricing and market share dynamics.


Key Takeaways

  • Eylea maintains a leading position in the anti-VEGF retinal therapy market, with U.S. prices averaging around USD 1,500 per dose.
  • Expected biosimilar entry by 2024–2025 could reduce per-dose prices by 20–30% over the next 3–5 years.
  • The expanding prevalence of retinal diseases globally presents continued growth opportunities, especially in emerging markets.
  • Cost containment policies and competitive pressures necessitate strategic adaptation for market participants.
  • Long-term market sustainability depends on innovation, including longer-acting formulations and gene therapies, which may disrupt current pricing paradigms.

FAQs

Q1: When are biosimilar versions of aflibercept expected to enter the market?
Biosimilar aflibercept products are currently in late-stage clinical development, with FDA approval anticipated by 2024 or 2025. Their market entry is likely within 1–2 years post-approval, contingent on regulatory and manufacturing factors.

Q2: How will biosimilars impact the pricing of Eylea?
Biosimilars typically attract price reductions of 20–30%, exerting downward pressure on original biologic drug prices as they gain market share, particularly in procedural and institutional settings.

Q3: What are the main drivers for future demand for aflibercept?
Increasing prevalence of AMD, DME, and retinal vein occlusions among aging populations, coupled with expanding access in emerging markets, will sustain demand levels.

Q4: How do reimbursement policies influence vial pricing?
Reimbursement negotiations and policies determine net reimbursement rates, influencing final prices paid by payers. In the U.S., ASP-based reimbursement often results in payments 20–30% below WAC, affecting profitability and pricing strategies.

Q5: Are there any long-term novel therapies that could replace aflibercept?
Yes. Gene therapies and extended-release formulations under clinical development aim to reduce injection frequency and improve outcomes, potentially altering the market landscape within the next decade.


Sources:

  1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Retina/Vitreous Panel (2020). Retina/ Vitreous Guidelines.
  2. U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Eylea (aflibercept) approval documents, 2011.
  3. Market research reports from IQVIA, Evaluate Pharma, and GlobalData, 2022.
  4. NEI (National Eye Institute). Eye Disease Prevalence Data, 2020.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.