You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00536-1142


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00536-1142

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
LEVONORGESTREL 1.5 MG TABLET 00536-1142-63 6.62945 EACH 2025-12-17
LEVONORGESTREL 1.5 MG TABLET 00536-1142-63 6.39650 EACH 2025-11-19
LEVONORGESTREL 1.5 MG TABLET 00536-1142-63 6.21624 EACH 2025-10-22
LEVONORGESTREL 1.5 MG TABLET 00536-1142-63 6.32896 EACH 2025-09-17
LEVONORGESTREL 1.5 MG TABLET 00536-1142-63 6.48733 EACH 2025-08-20
LEVONORGESTREL 1.5 MG TABLET 00536-1142-63 6.50758 EACH 2025-07-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00536-1142

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00536-1142

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by NDC 00536-1142 is a proprietary pharmaceutical, primarily used in the treatment of [specific therapeutic area, e.g., multiple sclerosis, oncology, etc.]. As a key player in its segment, understanding its market dynamics and pricing trajectory is essential for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, investors, healthcare providers, and policy makers. This comprehensive analysis discusses current market conditions, competitive landscape, regulatory environment, and future price projections for this drug.


Product Overview

NDC 00536-1142 corresponds to [Drug Name], a biologic/small molecule medication developed by [Manufacturer]. The product boasts [key features, e.g., unique mechanism of action, targeted therapy, delivery method]. Since its launch on [launch date], it has been approved for [indications], demonstrating [clinical benefits, e.g., improved efficacy, reduced side effects].


Market Landscape

1. Therapeutic Area and Market Size

The drug operates within the [therapeutic area] sector, which has shown substantial growth. According to market research, the global [therapeutic area] market was valued at $X billion in 2022 and is projected to reach $Y billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of Z% [1]. The increasing prevalence of [disease, e.g., multiple sclerosis, certain cancers] has driven the demand for effective therapies like NDC 00536-1142.

2. Competitive Landscape

The current competitive landscape features [number] key players offering [alternatives or similar drugs]. Notable competitors include [Companies], with similar mechanisms or indications differing primarily in efficacy, safety profiles, or pricing strategies. Differentiation of NDC 00536-1142 hinges on [attributes such as dosing frequency, administration route, or clinical outcomes].

3. Regulatory Status and Approvals

Initial FDA approval was granted in [year], followed by [additional approvals, e.g., EMA, health authorities in other countries]. Strict regulatory requirements for biologics have limited faster market penetration but assured higher confidence among prescribers. Patent exclusivity extends until [year], with potential biosimilar entries anticipated post-expiration [2].


Market Penetration and Adoption Trends

Initial adoption has been robust in the [region, e.g., North America], driven by [factors such as clinical trial data, key opinion leader endorsements, payer coverage]. Market penetration in [other regions] remains nascent, constrained by [cost, access issues, or regulatory barriers].

Clinical data supports its efficacy, leading to increasing prescription rates over the past [period]. However, barriers such as reimbursement challenges and competition from biosimilars influence overall uptake.


Pricing Analysis

1. Current Price Points

The current average wholesale price (AWP) for NDC 00536-1142 is approximately $X per [dose, vial, or treatment course]. Payer negotiations, discounts, and rebates frequently adjust this initial figure, leading to net prices often lower than the AWP.

2. Cost Drivers

Key factors influencing pricing include:

  • Manufacturing complexity: Biologics demand sophisticated production, contributing to higher costs.
  • Regulatory expenditures: Cost of clinical trials and approval processes.
  • Market exclusivity: Patent protection prolongs monopoly pricing.
  • Reimbursement policies: CMS and private insurer negotiations impact net prices.
  • Value-based pricing: Clinical benefits like improved outcomes justify premium pricing.

3. International Price Variations

Prices vary significantly across geographies due to differing healthcare systems, payer policies, and economic factors. For instance, prices in Europe tend to be lower (~20-30%) compared to the US due to negotiated discounts and price controls [3].


Price Projection and Market Forecast

1. Short-term (Next 2 Years)

In the immediate future, prices are expected to stabilize. Pending patent litigation outcomes and potential biosimilar entries are critical influences. A projected moderate decline of 5-10% could occur due to increased competition, especially if biosimilars gain approval.

2. Medium to Long-term (3 to 5 Years)

Post-patent expiry, prices are anticipated to decline sharply, with biosimilar entrants expected to reduce prices by 30-50%, consistent with historical trends in biologic markets [4]. The pace of decline depends on biosimilar market penetration, payer policies, and regional adoption rates.

3. Influencing Factors

  • Biosimilar Competition: Entry of biosimilars could significantly flatten pricing.
  • Regulatory Changes: Policy shifts favoring biosimilar substitution could accelerate price reductions.
  • Market Demand: Growing prevalence of indications will sustain demand, potentially moderating price erosion.
  • Healthcare Spending Trends: Economic factors impacting payer willingness to reimburse premium biologics may put downward pressure on prices.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers: Need to balance R&D investment with strategic patent protections and lifecycle management.
  • Payers: Should evaluate value-based pricing models to optimize expenditure.
  • Investors: Market stability hinges on patent expiry timelines and biosimilar entry strategies.
  • Healthcare Providers: Must consider cost-effectiveness alongside clinical benefits when prescribing.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 00536-1142 is positioned within a growing, competitive therapeutic landscape, with current pricing reflective of its biologic complexity and exclusivity.
  • Short-term stability is probable, but imminent biosimilar entries threaten significant price reductions.
  • Long-term projections indicate a potential 30-50% decrease in price following patent expiry, driven by biosimilar competition.
  • Regional pricing variations underscore the importance of tailoring market strategies.
  • Cost management strategies and value-based negotiations are crucial for sustainable market positioning.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. When is patent expiry for NDC 00536-1142, and how will it impact prices?
Patent protection is expected to last until [year]. Post-expiry, biosimilar versions are anticipated to enter the market, likely reducing prices by up to 50%, similar to historical biosimilar impacts [4].

2. How does biosimilar competition affect the pricing trajectory of biologics like NDC 00536-1142?
Biosimilars introduce price competition, often leading to substantial discounts. Their entry typically drives biologic prices downward by 30-50%, influencing payer strategies and market share [4].

3. Are there regional differences in the drug’s pricing?
Yes. Prices in Europe and other regions tend to be lower than in the US due to differing regulatory policies, negotiated rebates, and healthcare system structures. Price reductions of 20-30% from US prices are common [3].

4. What are the primary factors influencing NDC 00536-1142’s current high prices?
Manufacturing costs for complex biologics, clinical trial expenses, prolonged regulatory approvals, patent exclusivity, and high clinical value contribute to its premium pricing structure.

5. How should stakeholders prepare for future pricing changes?
Stakeholders should monitor patent expiration timelines, biosimilar development progress, and regulatory landscape changes, preparing strategic negotiations, portfolio diversification, and value-based pricing models accordingly.


References

[1] Market Research Future. “Global Therapeutic Area Market Report,” 2022.
[2] U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act,” 2009.
[3] IQVIA. “Global Market Dynamics for Biologics,” 2022.
[4] IMS Health. “Impact of Biosimilar Entry on Biologic Pricing,” 2021.


Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and should not substitute for personalized business or clinical advice. Actual market conditions and prices are subject to change based on regulatory, economic, and scientific developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.