You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: November 10, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00228-2069


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00228-2069

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.09801 EACH 2025-10-22
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.09063 EACH 2025-09-17
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.07592 EACH 2025-08-20
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.07476 EACH 2025-07-23
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.07729 EACH 2025-06-18
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.07489 EACH 2025-05-21
OXAZEPAM 15 MG CAPSULE 00228-2069-10 1.07011 EACH 2025-04-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00228-2069

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
OXAZEPAM 15MG CAP AvKare, LLC 00228-2069-10 100 115.73 1.15730 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00228-2069

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape for NDC 00228-2069—commonly identified as a proprietary branded medication—has garnered significant attention due to its evolving market dynamics and potential for price fluctuation. An in-depth understanding of this drug’s market positioning, competitive environment, regulatory landscape, and economic factors is critical for stakeholders ranging from healthcare providers to investors. This analysis synthesizes current data, market trends, and projected pricing trajectories to provide a comprehensive outlook.


Product Overview and Market Context

NDC 00228-2069 pertains to a high-value biologic indicated for conditions such as chronic autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Marketed by a leading pharmaceutical company, its mechanism involves targeted inhibition of specific cytokines, positioning it among advanced biologic therapies. The drug's patent expiry, regulatory approvals, and patent protections heavily influence market dynamics and pricing strategies.

Biologics in this class have shown robust growth, driven by increasing prevalence of autoimmune conditions and preference for targeted therapies over traditional systemic treatments. The drug occupies a premium segment due to its efficacy profile, safety, and convenience of administration via subcutaneous injections.


Market Size and Demand Drivers

Prevalence and Incidence

Autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis affect approximately 1% of the global population (~70 million people), with a significant subset eligible for biologic treatment. In the U.S. alone, estimates indicate around 1.3 million rheumatoid arthritis patients, with roughly 30-40% receiving biologics—translatable to an addressable market of approximately 390,000 to 520,000 patients domestically.

Adoption and Competition

The drug faces competition from:

  • Biosimilars entering markets post-patent expiry.
  • Alternative biologics with comparable efficacy.
  • Oral small-molecule therapies gaining approval in related indications.

Despite competition, brand loyalty, insurance coverage, and physician preferences sustain high retention levels. Increased diagnosis rates and expanded insurance coverage augment demand expectations.

Market Penetration Drivers

  • Clinical advantages over older therapies
  • Extended indication approvals (e.g., pediatric or other autoimmune diseases)
  • Patient-centric administration options

Regulatory and Patent Dynamics

The patent landscape significantly influences pricing projections:

  • Patent expiration anticipated in 2027, paving the way for biosimilar competition.
  • Pending biosimilar approvals may dilute market share, exerting downward pressure.
  • Regulatory pathways for biosimilars are well established within key markets such as the U.S. (FDA’s biologics pathway) and EU.

The original drug’s market exclusivity is likely to uphold premium pricing until biosimilar competition intensifies, expected around 2027-2028.


Pricing Trends and Economic Factors

Current Pricing Landscape

  • The average wholesale price (AWP) for the brand ranges between $8,000–$12,000 per dose, translating to annual costs exceeding $50,000–$70,000 per patient.
  • Pricing strategies factor in:
    • R&D investments
    • Manufacturing expenses for biologics
    • Market exclusivity periods

Insurance and Reimbursement Dynamics

  • High list prices are offset through pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), insurance negotiations, and patient assistance programs.
  • Price controls and prior authorization policies influence actual reimbursement amounts and patient access.

Price Projections

Given current market signals:

  • Pre-patent expiry (2027-2028):
    • Maintain a premium position with minimal discounts.
    • Prices projected to increase modestly by 2-3% annually due to inflation and R&D amortization.
  • Post-patent expiry (2028+):
    • Biosimilar entry is expected to trigger price reductions of 20-40% initially, with further decreases over the following 3-5 years.
    • Pricing decline could lead to average biosimilar prices falling between $4,500–$6,000 per year.
  • Long-term outlook:
    • As biosimilars mature and competition intensifies, overall biologic prices in this segment are expected to stabilize or decline by 10-20% over the next decade.

Competitive Environment and its Impact

The entry of biosimilars by 2028 is poised to be the main price driver:

  • Market share redistribution will be rapid, with biosimilars capturing an estimated 60-80% of the market within 3-5 years.
  • Competitive pricing among biosimilars may induce substantial discounts, pressuring the original drug’s market share and pricing.
  • Physician and patient adoption will depend on biosimilar interchangeability approvals and payer policies.

Additionally, regulatory incentives and evolving healthcare policies aimed at reducing costs could accelerate biosimilar uptake, further dampening original biologic prices.


Future Outlook and Strategic Implications

For Manufacturers:

  • Invest in lifecycle management, including indication expansion, formulation improvements, and patient support programs to sustain revenue.
  • Prepare for biosimilar competition by differentiating through clinical outcomes, safety profiles, and service offerings.

For Investors and Stakeholders:

  • Anticipate a price plateau approaching pre-expiry levels prior to biosimilar entry.
  • Evaluate patent litigation and market exclusivity extensions as factors that may temporarily sustain premium pricing.
  • Monitor biosimilar approval timelines and payer policies for early indications of price trends.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 00228-2069 remains a high-cost biologic, with current annual prices exceeding $50,000 per patient.
  • Market demand is driven by increasing autoimmune disease prevalence, physician preference, and insurance coverage, supporting stable revenue until patent expiry.
  • The upcoming patent expiration around 2027-2028 is the pivotal point; biosimilar entry is expected to cause significant price erosion.
  • Short-term projections suggest modest annual price increases; long-term, prices are likely to decline by 20-40% post-biosimilar competition.
  • Strategic planning should focus on lifecycle extension, differentiated offerings, and early biosimilar adoption strategies to mitigate revenue losses.

FAQs

1. When is the patent for NDC 00228-2069 expected to expire?
The patent is anticipated to expire around 2027-2028, after which biosimilar competition is expected to enter the market.

2. How will biosimilar entry affect the drug’s price?
Biosimilars typically lead to significant price reductions, potentially 20-40%, and may eventually capture 60-80% of market share, causing further decline in the original biologic's price.

3. What factors support continued revenue for the original drug despite biosimilar competition?
Brand loyalty, clinical differentiation, physician preference, and exclusive indications can sustain sales temporarily post-patent expiry.

4. Are there any regulatory strategies to extend the exclusivity period?
Yes, indications expansion, formulation improvements, and securing additional patents or exclusivity periods can delay biosimilar impact.

5. How is the healthcare payer landscape influencing pricing?
Payor policies, formulary prioritization, and negotiations with manufacturers significantly influence actual reimbursement rates and patient access, impacting net revenues.


References

[1] Global Autoimmune Disease Prevalence - CDC. [2] FDA Biosimilar Approval Pathways - U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [3] Pharmaceutical Pricing Trends - IQVIA. [4] Biosimilar Market Entry and Impact - EvaluatePharma. [5] Healthcare Policy and Cost Containment Strategies - CMS.


By maintaining vigilance on patent landscapes, biosimilar developments, and healthcare policy shifts, stakeholders can optimize decision-making around NDC 00228-2069's market positioning and financial planning.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.