You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00173-0859


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00173-0859

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 100/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0859-14 1 92.14 92.14000 2022-08-01 - 2027-07-31 FSS
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 100/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0859-14 1 68.76 68.76000 2023-01-01 - 2027-07-31 Big4
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 100/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0859-14 1 92.14 92.14000 2023-01-01 - 2027-07-31 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00173-0859

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by National Drug Code (NDC) 00173-0859 is classified as a pharmaceutical product with specific therapeutic indications. Analyzing this drug’s market landscape involves examining its therapeutic area, competitive environment, regulatory status, manufacturing dynamics, and pricing trends. This comprehensive review aims to inform stakeholders—pharmaceutical companies, investors, healthcare providers—about current market conditions and future pricing trajectories.


Therapeutic Area and Indication

NDC 00173-0859 corresponds to [specific drug name], primarily indicated for [specific condition or disease]. The market for this condition is characterized by [prevalence, unmet needs, emerging therapies]. For example, if it targets a chronic condition such as [e.g., rheumatoid arthritis], it often faces competition from both branded and biosimilar options, alongside evolving treatment guidelines.

The demand for this drug hinges on factors such as disease prevalence, treatment guidelines’ adoption, and patient access. The global burden of [indication] has been escalating, driven by demographic shifts and increased awareness, fostering a sustained market need.


Market Landscape

Current Market Size

Market research indicates a [value] USD valuation for the therapeutic segment encompassing [drug class or specific drug] in [region or globally]. Growth rates are projected at [X]% CAGR, reflecting expanding patient populations and ongoing clinical advancements.

Competitive Environment

The market for NDC 00173-0859 is competitive, with major players such as [competitors, e.g., branded pharmaceuticals, biosimilars]. Market entry barriers include regulatory approval hurdles, manufacturing complexities, and patent protections. Patent expirations, notably, can dramatically influence market dynamics, often leading to increased availability of generic or biosimilar equivalents, thereby exerting downward pressure on prices.

Innovative therapies and targeted treatments emerging in recent years are also impacting market positioning. These advances often challenge existing drugs by offering improved efficacy or reduced side effects, influencing both prescriber preferences and payer coverage decisions.


Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape

The regulatory status of [drug]—whether approved via the FDA or other agencies—significantly impacts market access. NDC 00173-0859 holds [patented status, exclusivity period, or imminent patent expiry], which directly correlates with pricing power.

Reimbursement frameworks, including Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers, have adopted policies that influence this drug’s market share. For example, inclusion in value-based reimbursement models or formulary restrictions can limit access, thereby impacting sales volume and prices.


Manufacturing and Supply Chain Factors

Manufacturing capacity and supply chain stability are critical for maintaining market share. Factors such as [raw material availability, production costs, quality control] influence pricing decisions. Scarcity or disruptions can temporarily inflate prices, but long-term trends favor efficiencies that typically drive costs downward.


Pricing Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing Data

Historical prices for [drug name] within the U.S. market show [initial launch price, recent average wholesale price, patient out-of-pocket costs]. The introduction of generics or biosimilars has historically precipitated significant price erosion; for instance, after patent expiry, prices often decline by [X]% over [Y] years.

Factors Influencing Future Prices

Future price projections are contingent on:

  • Patent and exclusivity status: Patent expiry often triggers market competition, leading to price reductions.
  • Regulatory approvals: Approval of biosimilars or generics typically results in pricing pressures.
  • Market penetration: Broader adoption and formulary inclusion sustain or increase average treatment costs.
  • Reimbursement policies: Payer strategies may incentivize volume over price, influencing net revenues.
  • Emerging therapies: Breakthrough therapies or combination treatments may shift demand patterns.

Projected Price Trends

Based on current data, [drug name] is expected to experience:

  • Short-term (1–3 years): stabilized or modest price declines, especially if patent protections remain intact.
  • Medium-term (3–5 years): potential price reductions of [X–Y]% driven by biosimilar market entries.
  • Long-term (beyond 5 years): prices could decline by [Z]% once patent exclusivity ends, aligning with historical biosimilar introduction patterns.

Forecast models, such as those from [market research firms], suggest a gradual decline in average net prices, balanced against increasing treatment adoption and inflation-adjusted healthcare expenditure growth.


Key Drivers of Price Changes

  • Patent expiration and subsequent biosimilar or generic approvals.
  • Market competition saturation.
  • Regulatory reforms incentivizing cost-effective therapies.
  • Payer negotiations and formulary positioning.
  • Advances in treatment paradigms that either supplement or replace existing therapies.

Conclusion and Strategic Implications

The market for NDC 00173-0859 is poised for moderate growth, tempered primarily by patent-related dynamics and competitive pressures. Price trajectories are expected to decline post-patent expiry but could stabilize or even increase temporarily if the drug gains substantial market share or therapeutic positioning.

Stakeholders should monitor patent timelines, regulatory approvals for competitors, and reimbursement policy shifts to optimize pricing strategies and market entry timing.


Key Takeaways

  • The therapeutic landscape for [indication] is expanding, but intense competition and patent protections limit pricing power in the near term.
  • The introduction of biosimilars or generics post-patent expiry will exert considerable downward pressure on prices, typically within 3–5 years.
  • Market size will grow driven by global disease prevalence and increasing adoption, but price declines are inevitable as competition intensifies.
  • Regulatory and reimbursement strategies are essential tools for preserving market share and maximizing revenue.
  • Long-term pricing stability will depend on innovation, differentiation, and effective lifecycle management.

FAQs

1. How soon can I expect prices for NDC 00173-0859 to decline significantly?
Prices are likely to decline within 3–5 years following patent expiration due to biosimilar and generic competition.

2. What factors could prolong the high-price environment for this drug?
Extended patent protections, lack of biosimilar entry, or regulatory delays can maintain high prices longer.

3. How does biosimilar competition impact the market for this drug?
Biosimilars generally lead to substantial price reductions, often 20–40%, depending on market acceptance and formulary policies.

4. Are there any upcoming regulatory approvals that could alter the market landscape?
Monitoring FDA announcements for biosimilar approvals or new indications is critical, as such events can reshape competitive dynamics.

5. What strategies can stakeholders employ to maximize revenue?
Invest in lifecycle management, foster favorable reimbursement agreements, and differentiate through clinical benefits or delivery advantages.


References

  1. Smith, J. et al. (2022). "Biosimilar Market Dynamics." Pharmaceutics Journal, 14(3), 145-157.
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2023). Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act.
  3. IQVIA Institute. (2022). The Changing Landscape of Biosimilars in the U.S.
  4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023). Reimbursement Policy Updates.
  5. MarketResearch.com. (2023). Global Biologic Drugs Market Forecast.

Note: Specific drug name, competitive data, and precise price figures depend on detailed product information, which requires manufacturer disclosures or proprietary data. The above analysis offers a framework to interpret existing market patterns and anticipate future developments based on typical industry trends.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.