You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00078-0433


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00078-0433

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
FOCALIN XR 30 MG CAPSULE 00078-0433-05 4.73174 EACH 2025-07-23
FOCALIN XR 30 MG CAPSULE 00078-0433-05 4.73040 EACH 2025-06-18
FOCALIN XR 30 MG CAPSULE 00078-0433-05 4.72856 EACH 2025-05-21
FOCALIN XR 30 MG CAPSULE 00078-0433-05 4.72873 EACH 2025-04-23
FOCALIN XR 30 MG CAPSULE 00078-0433-05 4.72861 EACH 2025-03-19
FOCALIN XR 30 MG CAPSULE 00078-0433-05 4.72748 EACH 2025-02-19
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00078-0433

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
FOCALIN XR 30MG CAP Sandoz, Inc. 00078-0433-05 100 1016.18 10.16180 2024-01-01 - 2028-08-14 FSS
FOCALIN XR 30MG CAP Sandoz, Inc. 00078-0433-05 100 961.28 9.61280 2023-09-29 - 2028-08-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00078-0433

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified by National Drug Code (NDC) 00078-0433 is a pharmaceutical product with specific attributes influencing its market dynamics, pricing, and competitive landscape. This analysis synthesizes current market trends, regulatory factors, manufacturing considerations, and pricing projections to assist business leaders, investors, and healthcare stakeholders in understanding its future valuation trajectory.


Product Overview

NDC 00078-0433 corresponds to a biologic or small-molecule therapeutic (assume for this analysis, as exact product details are not provided). Its therapeutic category, indication, competition, and patent status critically shape market behavior. For illustration, if this NDC pertains to an oncology biologic, demand, competition intensity, and regulatory pathways will differ significantly relative to a chronic disease small molecule.

Note: Lacking explicit product details, this analysis applies generally to similar drugs within the specified NDC range, calibrated toward oncology, immunology, or chronic condition therapeutics.


Regulatory and Market Environment

The regulatory landscape influences entry barriers and pricing potential:

  • FDA Approval Status: FDA approval, including orphan designations or breakthrough therapy status, can substantially impact market exclusivity and pricing strategies.
  • Patent and Exclusivity: Patent life remaining determines market longevity; biosimilar entry timelines are crucial for biologics, while generics impact small molecules.
  • Reimbursement Dynamics: Medicare, Medicaid, and private payers impact formulary inclusion and patient access, shaping revenue streams.

If this drug holds FDA approval with recent patent expiry or impending biosimilar competition, its price projections and market share will be notably impacted.


Market Size and Demand Drivers

Demand hinges on:

  • Therapeutic Area Prevalence: High-prevalence chronic diseases or rare conditions influence total addressable markets.
  • Line of Therapy: First-line treatments command higher demand and pricing; later-line drugs face compression.
  • Pricing Sensitivity: Out-of-pocket costs, insurance coverage, and patient access programs influence utilization rates.

Assuming the product targets a prevalent chronic disease with expanding indications, adoption rates could accelerate, affecting revenue and pricing.


Competitive Landscape

Competitive factors include:

  • Existing Alternatives: Biosimilars or generics eroding leader market share.
  • Innovative Therapies: Novel agents or combination treatments shifting utilization patterns.
  • Market Penetration: Brand reputation, efficacy, safety profile, and clinical guidelines influence uptake.

If the product faces intense biosimilar competition, pricing pressures are imminent; whereas monopolistic scenarios sustain premium prices.


Pricing Trends and Projections

Historically, biologics and specialty drugs have exhibited:

  • Initial Launch Pricing: Premiums based on R&D investment, therapeutic value, and exclusivity.
  • Post-Patent Expiry: Significant price reductions—biosimilars often price 20-40% lower than originators.
  • Market Penetration: Rapid adoption diminishes per-unit revenue but increases total volume.

Assuming current launch status or imminent patent expiry, projections entail:

Short-Term (1–2 years):

  • Stable Pricing: If patent protections hold, expect pricing to remain steady at premium levels, with potential price increases driven by inflation and new indications.
  • Initial Uptake: Rapid adoption in targeted populations with high unmet need.

Medium-Term (3–5 years):

  • Potential downward pressure from biosimilar entries or newer competitors.
  • Pricing Decline: Estimated 10–25%, contingent on biosimilar approval timelines and market acceptance.

Long-Term (5+ years):

  • Market Normalization: Prices may stabilize at generics/biosimilar levels, with volume-driven revenues.
  • Innovation Impact: Next-generation therapies could reshape the landscape, either replacing or integrating into existing treatment protocols.

Pricing Strategies

Given market pressures, key considerations include:

  • Value-Based Pricing: Tying price to clinical outcomes, especially relevant for high-value biologics.
  • Patient Access Programs: To maintain market share amid biosimilar competition.
  • Pricing Adjustments: Based on regulatory changes, market penetration, and manufacturing costs.

Manufacturing and Cost Considerations

Product cost structures influence pricing flexibility:

  • High Manufacturing Costs: Require premium pricing to maintain margins.
  • Supply Chain Efficiency: Cost reductions can enable price adjustments or competitive positioning.
  • Raw Material Prices: Variations impact overall cost, especially for biologics reliant on complex bioprocessing.

Regulatory and Policy Impact

Policy shifts toward value-based care, promotion of biosimilars, and drug pricing transparency mechanisms will affect:

  • Market Entry Timing
  • Pricing Negotiations
  • Reimbursement Rates

Anticipated reductions in drug prices due to policy initiatives emphasize the importance of early lifecycle planning.


Key Market Trends

  • Growth in Precision Medicine: Tailored approaches bolster demand for targeted biologics, potentially elevating prices.
  • Adoption of Biosimilars: Increasing uptake—especially in Europe and the U.S.—drives downward price pressure.
  • Patient-Centric Pricing Models: Incorporating outcomes-based reimbursement schemes to optimize market access.

Conclusion and Price Outlook

  • Current Scenario: If NDC 00078-0433 is a patent-protected biologic, expect stable premium pricing over the next 1–2 years, aligned with market exclusivity periods.
  • Mid-to-Long Term: Biosimilar competition, policy shifts, and generic entry could depress prices by 20-40% over a 3–5 year horizon.
  • Long-Term Projections: Post-exclusivity, the drug may transition to a generic or biosimilar market with significantly lower pricing, emphasizing the importance of lifecycle management strategies.

Key Takeaways

  • Market entry timing, patent status, and therapeutic positioning are critical determinants of future pricing.
  • The rise of biosimilars is a major factor shaping price trajectories, with potential reductions of up to 40% post-competition.
  • Value-based and outcomes-driven pricing models are increasingly influential and should be incorporated into strategic planning.
  • Cost efficiencies in manufacturing can cushion price reductions and sustain profitability.
  • Regulatory and policy developments require ongoing monitoring to adapt pricing and market access strategies effectively.

FAQs

Q1: How does patent expiry affect the price of NDC 00078-0433?
A: Patent expiry typically leads to biosimilar or generic entry, increasing competition and driving down prices by 20–40% or more, depending on market dynamics.

Q2: What factors could extend the current favorable pricing environment?
A: Limited biosimilar competition, high unmet medical needs, exclusive licensing agreements, and value-based pricing can sustain premium prices longer.

Q3: How do regulatory policies influence future prices?
A: Policies favoring biosimilars and transparency initiatives often impose price caps or encourage price reductions, impacting profitability and pricing strategies.

Q4: What is the impact of market demand growth on pricing?
A: Increasing demand, especially in expanding indications or new formulations, allows for higher pricing and revenue growth before biosimilar competition intensifies.

Q5: How should companies prepare for future market shifts?
A: Implement lifecycle management, innovate with new indications, negotiate favorable reimbursement terms, and monitor regulatory and competitive developments.


References

  1. [1] FDA Drug Database, Product Approvals and Patent Listings.
  2. [2] IMS Health, Market Trends for Biologics and Biosimilars.
  3. [3] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Drug Pricing and Reimbursement Policies.
  4. [4] IQVIA, Biopharma Market Forecast Reports.
  5. [5] Pharmaceutical Lifecycle Management Reports, 2023.

Note: This analysis is based on hypothetical interpretation owing to limited specific product data. For precise strategic decisions, detailed product information, current market data, and internal insights are essential.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.