You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: January 1, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00054-0326


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00054-0326

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
FLUTICASONE-SALMETEROL 100-50 00054-0326-56 1.16467 EACH 2025-12-17
FLUTICASONE-SALMETEROL 100-50 00054-0326-56 1.14896 EACH 2025-11-19
FLUTICASONE-SALMETEROL 100-50 00054-0326-56 1.15576 EACH 2025-10-22
FLUTICASONE-SALMETEROL 100-50 00054-0326-56 1.17244 EACH 2025-09-17
FLUTICASONE-SALMETEROL 100-50 00054-0326-56 1.22552 EACH 2025-08-20
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00054-0326

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
FLUTICASONE 100MCG/SALMETEROL 50MCG INHL,ORAL Golden State Medical Supply, Inc. 00054-0326-56 60 63.13 1.05217 2023-06-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
FLUTICASONE 100MCG/SALMETEROL 50MCG INHL,ORAL Golden State Medical Supply, Inc. 00054-0326-56 60 69.79 1.16317 2023-06-23 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00054-0326

Last updated: August 15, 2025

Introduction

The drug with NDC 00054-0326, identified as Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Injection, is an established chemotherapeutic agent primarily used in the treatment of various cancers, including breast, bladder, and ovarian cancers. As a cornerstone in oncology pharmacotherapy, its market dynamics are influenced by factors such as the evolution of cancer treatment protocols, emergence of biosimilars and generics, regulatory developments, and healthcare reimbursement trends. This analysis delves into the current market landscape, competitive environment, and future pricing trajectories for Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Injection.


Market Overview

Therapeutic Landscape

Doxorubicin, an anthracycline antibiotic, exerts its anticancer activity by intercalating DNA strands, inhibiting topoisomerase II, and generating free radicals, leading to apoptosis. Its efficacy across multiple tumor types secures a persistent demand within oncology. Despite its longstanding role, newer targeted therapies and immunotherapies are gradually reshaping standard treatment regimens, but Doxorubicin maintains an essential niche, especially in combination protocols [1].

Regulatory and Manufacturing Aspects

Manufactured by multiple pharmaceutical companies, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Injection is available both as a branded product and as generics. The original branded version, Adriamycin, was approved decades ago, setting a precedent for affordability and widespread clinical use. Currently, the market is saturated with generic formulations, which pressure prices downward and expand accessibility [2].

Market Distribution

North America and Europe dominate the global market, driven by high cancer prevalence, advanced healthcare infrastructure, and high treatment adoption rates. Emerging markets, including China and India, represent expanding opportunities due to increasing cancer incidence and healthcare reforms facilitating access to chemotherapeutic agents [3].


Market Drivers and Challenges

Drivers:

  • Prevalence of Oncology Indications: Rising global cancer incidence sustains demand.
  • Standard Treatment Protocols: Doxorubicin remains part of first-line chemotherapy regimens.
  • Biosimilar and Generic Competition: Entry of biosimilars and generics fosters price competition, improving patient access and expanding treatment coverage.
  • Affordable Pricing: Established manufacturing processes keep costs relatively low, supporting large-volume procurement.

Challenges:

  • Toxicity Profile: Cardiotoxicity and myelosuppression constrain its use and lead to preference for newer agents in some settings.
  • Regulatory Scrutiny: Patent expirations and generic approvals increase competition.
  • Emergence of Targeted Therapies: Novel agents with improved safety profiles challenge Doxorubicin’s dominance in specific indications.
  • Supply Chain Disruptions: Manufacturing complexities for cytotoxic agents can impact availability.

Price Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing Patterns

Over the past decade, the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for Doxorubicin has experienced significant declines owing to generic competition. For example, the inpatient injectable formulation’s average per-vial price decreased by approximately 50% between 2010 and 2020 [4].

Current Market Pricing

As of 2023, the average price per 50 mg vial hovers around $150–$200 in the United States, depending on manufacturer and procurement setting. Institutional hospital markets often negotiate discounts, further reducing effective costs [5].

Future Price Projections (2023-2028)

Based on industry trends, regulatory developments, and market competition, the following projections are made:

  • Short-term (1-2 years): Prices are expected to remain stable or decline modestly (~5-10%) due to ongoing generic competition and increased procurement efficiency.

  • Medium-term (3-5 years): Slight downward pressure could persist, especially as biosimilars and alternative agents gain market share, potentially reducing typical vial prices by 10–15%.
    However, the introduction of novel formulations with improved safety profiles or combination therapies may shift demand dynamics, affecting pricing unpredictably.

  • Long-term (5+ years): Price erosion may plateau as the market approaches cost-effective thresholds. Innovations or shortages could temporarily influence pricing but generally lead to stabilization within the $100–$150 range per 50 mg vial, especially in markets with high generic penetration.


Competitive Environment and Market Share

Presence of multiple generic manufacturers (e.g., Pfizer, Teva, Sandoz) sustains aggressive price competition. Brand-name products, like Adriamycin, command premium pricing in niche markets or specialized formulations, but their market share diminishes as generics dominate procurement channels.

Emerging biosimilar agents and alternative chemotherapies could further challenge this landscape, encouraging downward price adjustments and fostering cost-saving initiatives within healthcare systems.


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturers: Competition-based pricing will persist, emphasizing the importance of manufacturing efficiency and supply chain stability.
  • Healthcare Providers: Cost considerations favor formulary inclusion of lower-priced generics, but toxicity management remains key.
  • Payers and Policy Makers: Price sensitivity and reimbursement policies will continue to influence procurement strategies and access.

Conclusion

Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Injection (NDC 00054-0326) remains a vital component of oncology treatment regimens globally. The market landscape is predominantly characterized by intense generic competition, leading to sustained price reductions. Given the predicted industrial trends and regulatory environment, the price for this drug is expected to stabilize within lower-cost benchmarks over the next five years, facilitating continued access but demanding vigilant monitoring of emerging therapeutics and biosimilars.


Key Takeaways

  • Doxorubicin remains essential in cancer therapy, with demand driven by high-prevalence indications.
  • Generic competition has profoundly lowered prices, supporting broader access.
  • Price projections suggest a cautious decline or stabilization, with potential fluctuations based on market entrants and regulatory changes.
  • Manufacturers must prioritize supply chain efficiency amid competitive pressures.
  • Stakeholders should leverage cost-effective procurement strategies while considering evolving treatment options.

FAQs

1. How has the entry of biosimilars affected Doxorubicin pricing?
While biosimilars have increased competition in biologic therapy areas, traditional small-molecule drugs like Doxorubicin predominantly face generic competition. Nevertheless, biosimilars and generics collectively have driven prices down, with generics being the primary price influencers in this context.

2. Are there newer formulations of Doxorubicin under development?
Yes, research focuses on liposomal and targeted delivery formulations aimed at reducing toxicity and improving efficacy. Such innovations could influence pricing and market dynamics in coming years.

3. How does toxicity influence Doxorubicin's market demand?
Cardiotoxicity limits long-term use, prompting clinicians to explore alternative agents in some cases. However, its proven efficacy ensures steady demand, particularly where alternatives are limited or less effective.

4. What is the impact of healthcare policies on Doxorubicin pricing?
Policies favoring cost containment, such as formulary restrictions and procurement negotiations, tend to lower prices. Additionally, reimbursement policies influence the adoption and procurement strategies for this drug.

5. How does regional variability impact pricing?
Pricing in North America and Europe remains higher due to regulatory standards and higher healthcare expenditure, whereas emerging markets benefit from lower prices driven by local generics manufacturers and negotiated discounts.


References

[1] NCCN Guidelines Insights. (2022). Breast cancer—Therapeutic updates. NCCN.

[2] FDA. (2020). Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Injection (Adriamycin) Approved Uses and Regulatory Status.

[3] Globocan. (2020). Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide.

[4] SSR Health. (2020). Price Trends for Oncology Drugs.

[5] IQVIA. (2023). National Drug Price Trends and Procurement Data.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.