You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 28, 2026

Drug Price Trends for NDC 72603-0166


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 72603-0166

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 72603-0166

Last updated: March 13, 2026

What is the Drug?

NDC 72603-0166 refers to Teprotumumab-trbw (Tepezza), approved by the FDA in January 2020 for the treatment of thyroid eye disease (TED). It is a monoclonal antibody targeting the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R). Its indication is limited to TED, a rare but severe orbital condition associated with Graves' disease.

Market Size and Demand

Addressable Patient Population

  • Thyroid eye disease prevalence: 16 per 100,000 adults in the U.S. (~53,300 diagnosed cases in a population of 330 million).
  • Severity subset: Approximately 30-50% of TED patients require systemic therapy; about 16,000-26,500 patients are market-ready annually in the U.S.
  • Global estimates: Limited, but comparable trends suggest a multi-thousand patient base in Europe and Japan.

Market Adoption

  • Tepezza gained substantial adoption post-approval; initial sales reached approximately $218 million in 2020.
  • Rising awareness among ophthalmologists and endocrinologists is expanding usage.
  • The treatment regimen involves eight IV infusions over 22 weeks, with some patients requiring retreatment, supporting ongoing demand.

Competitive Landscape

Key Competitors

  • Off-label treatments: Corticosteroids, radiotherapy, orbital decompression surgery.
  • Emerging therapies: Other monoclonal antibodies targeting pathways involved in TED, but none approved.

Market Share

  • Tepezza holds near-exclusive rights for systemic TED treatment.
  • Limited competition leads to high pricing power.

Barriers to Entry

  • Orphan disease status with small patient pool.
  • High development costs for biosimilars or alternative biologics.
  • Regulatory and reimbursement hurdles are significant but manageable.

Pricing Strategies and Reimbursement

Current Price Points

  • The average wholesale price (AWP) per infusion in the U.S. is approximately $10,000.
  • Total treatment cost ranges from $80,000 to $125,000 per course, depending on dosing adjustments.

Reimbursement Trends

  • Commercial insurers and Medicare Part B provide coverage.
  • Coverage policies are generally favorable due to FDA approval and clinical efficacy.

Price Trajectory Projections

Year Estimated Average Price per Infusion Assumed Number of Infusions Total Cost per Patient Notes
2023 $10,000 8 $80,000 Base case; current market price
2024 $10,200 8 $81,600 2% annual increase
2025 $10,404 8 $83,232 2% increase
2026 $10,612 8 $84,896 2% increase

Assumptions include modest annual price increases aligned with inflation and payor negotiations.

Price Drivers

  • Increased demand as awareness grows.
  • Potential negotiations with payors to reduce costs.
  • Competitive developments could pressure prices downward.

Future Market Outlook

  • Volume growth depends on broader awareness and increased diagnosis.
  • The small patient pool constrains revenue but sustains high per-patient pricing.
  • The entry of biosimilars is unlikely in the next 5-7 years due to the complexity and costs associated with biologic production.

Risks and Uncertainties

  • Regulatory changes affecting coverage or labeling.
  • Off-label competition or future approvals for alternative treatments.
  • Potential reductions in price resistance due to healthcare policy shifts.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 72603-0166 (Tepezza) dominates the systemic TED treatment landscape with high pricing, driven by small but significant patient demand.
  • Market size remains limited; total revenue hinges on volume management and pricing strategies.
  • Price projections suggest steady increases, contingent on demand growth and market dynamics.
  • Reimbursement environment remains supportive, yet subject to policy change.
  • Competitive threats are minimal in the near term; biosimilar entry remains unlikely soon.

FAQs

1. Is there a significant pipeline for treatments competing with Tepezza?
Current pipeline candidates are limited; systemic TED treatments are scarce, and Tepezza retains a strong market position for the near term.

2. How might biosimilars impact prices?
Biosimilar development faces scientific and regulatory barriers, making early entry unlikely. Competition may emerge after 2027, potentially reducing prices.

3. What are the key factors influencing reimbursement?
FDA approval, demonstrated clinical efficacy, and payer coverage policies influence reimbursement levels and price negotiations.

4. Will the price per infusion increase significantly?
Annual increases are projected at 2%, primarily driven by inflation and payor negotiations, barring new market disruptions.

5. How does international pricing compare?
Pricing outside the U.S. tends to be lower due to pricing regulations, negotiations, and healthcare system differences.

References

[1] IQVIA. (2022). Revolutionary Growth in Rare Disease Biologics.
[2] FDA. (2020). FDA approves Tepezza to treat thyroid eye disease.
[3] EvaluatePharma. (2022). Biologic drug pricing trends and forecasts.
[4] Medicare.gov. (2023). Coverage policies for biologic therapies.
[5] Healthcare Market Intelligence. (2022). Market dynamics in ophthalmic biologics.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.