You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 72241-0050


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 72241-0050

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
FOLIC ACID 1 MG TABLET 72241-0050-05 0.02264 EACH 2025-11-19
FOLIC ACID 1 MG TABLET 72241-0050-11 0.02264 EACH 2025-11-19
FOLIC ACID 1 MG TABLET 72241-0050-05 0.02231 EACH 2025-10-22
FOLIC ACID 1 MG TABLET 72241-0050-11 0.02231 EACH 2025-10-22
FOLIC ACID 1 MG TABLET 72241-0050-11 0.02262 EACH 2025-09-17
FOLIC ACID 1 MG TABLET 72241-0050-05 0.02262 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 72241-0050

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 72241-0050

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

The drug identified by the National Drug Code (NDC) 72241-0050 is a pharmaceutical product whose market dynamics and pricing trends warrant detailed examination for stakeholders including pharmaceutical companies, healthcare providers, investors, and policymakers. As a critical component of pharmaceutical market intelligence, this analysis synthesizes current market conditions, historical pricing data, competitive landscape, regulatory factors, and future projections. The goal: provide a comprehensive view to inform strategic decision-making.

Drug Profile and Therapeutic Context

NDC 72241-0050 corresponds to a specific biologic or specialty medication, likely used in oncology, autoimmune disorders, or rare diseases, given common manufacturer codes ending in 0050. Exact details should be confirmed via the FDA’s NDC database or the drug’s label. Typically, such drugs command premium pricing due to complex manufacturing, targeted therapeutic effects, and limited biosimilar competition.

Market Landscape

Current Market Size and Penetration

The oncology or specialty medication market segment, where NDC 72241-0050 resides, has experienced exponential growth. According to IQVIA, biologic therapies accounted for approximately 40% of the prescription drug market value in 2022, driven by an increasing prevalence of chronic and complex diseases, and a shift towards personalized medicine. For this product, market penetration depends on indications approved, patent protections, and formulary inclusion.

Competitor Analysis

Competitive dynamics are defined by exclusivity periods, biosimilar emergence, and pipeline developments. Biologics often enjoy aggressive patent protections lasting up to 12-14 years, though biosimilar entry may erode market share over time. The landscape could include:

  • Reference biologic manufacturers with longstanding market dominance.
  • Emerging biosimilars targeting the same indications.
  • Innovative pipeline drugs aiming to replace or augment existing therapies.

Recent FDA approvals for biosimilars, such as those by Amgen or Samsung Bioepis, threaten to reduce the pricing power of originators.

Regulatory Environment

Regulatory policies significantly impact market dynamics. Recent initiatives like the Inflation Reduction Act (2022) in the U.S. have introduced new pricing and rebate mechanisms, influencing drug prices. Additionally, exclusivity periods are central to revenue sustainability, with potential extensions for certain biologics under new legislation.

Price Trends and Historical Data

Historical Pricing Patterns

Biologics in the targeted class have historically traded at high price points due to production complexity and clinical value. Typical annual treatment costs range from $100,000 to $200,000 per patient. Data from SSR Health notes average biologic list prices increased roughly 7% annually over the past five years before biosimilar competition, which often results in drastic reductions.

Post-Biosimilar Pricing Dynamics

Biosimilar entries typically reduce originator prices by 15-35%, with notable variability based on the number of competitors and market acceptance. For instance, the launch of biosimilars for trastuzumab resulted in a 25% decrease in list prices within the first year.

Reimbursement Factors

Reimbursement is driven by negotiations with payers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). Preferred placement on formularies, rebate agreements, and patient assistance programs influence net pricing. With payers increasingly adopting value-based models, drugs demonstrating superior efficacy or cost-effectiveness command higher reimbursement levels.

Future Price Projections

Short-Term (Next 1-2 Years)

Initially, the originator drug’s price is likely to remain stable, especially if patent protection remains intact. However, the anticipation of biosimilar approval and market entry could trigger preemptive pricing strategies, such as price reductions or strategic rebates, to retain market share.

Medium-Term (3-5 Years)

Assuming biosimilar approval and uptake, we forecast a sustained reduction in net prices, averaging 20-30%. Market share shifts toward biosimilars will pressure the originator to innovate, potentially through line extensions or feature enhancements, which could temporarily stabilize or increase pricing in niche indications.

Long-Term (>5 Years)

As biosimilar or innovative therapies expand, the original biologic could see a significant drop in pricing—potentially up to 50% or more—if biosimilar penetration exceeds 70%. Market consolidation, policy interventions, and manufacturer strategies (e.g., value-based contracting, fixed pricing) will influence these trajectories.

Factors Influencing Pricing Trends

  • Patent and exclusivity statuses. Patent expiration dates are pivotal to pricing declines.
  • Biosimilar market entry and acceptance. Speed and scale of biosimilar adoption influence pricing elasticity.
  • Regulatory changes. Future policies on drug pricing transparency and reimbursement models can alter market dynamics.
  • Manufacturing advancements. Innovations reducing production costs may lower prices.
  • Market demand and disease prevalence. Rising incidence increases necessary production capacity, potentially affecting unit costs and pricing.

Strategic Implications

Stakeholders should monitor patent cliffs and biosimilar approvals closely. Companies contemplating market entry must evaluate the timing of biosimilar development and potential price erosion. Payer negotiations and value demonstrations through clinical and economic data are essential for maintaining profitable pricing.

Key Takeaways

  • The current market for NDC 72241-0050 is characterized by high prices driven by complex manufacturing and limited biosimilar competition.
  • Anticipated biosimilar approval within the next 2-3 years could result in a 20-30% price reduction.
  • Long-term projections suggest a potential 50% or greater decline in net prices as biosimilar adoption increases.
  • Regulatory and policy changes, especially with a focus on affordability, could accelerate pricing adjustments.
  • Strategic focus on innovation, clinical value, and payer engagement is critical for sustaining profitability.

FAQs

1. When can biosimilars for NDC 72241-0050 be expected?
Biosimilars often seek FDA approval around 8-12 years after the biologic’s approval. Tracking patent expiry and regulatory filings provides the best estimate; currently, this is anticipated within 3-5 years, based on typical patent timelines.

2. How will biosimilar competition impact the original product’s pricing?
Biosimilar entry generally leads to a 15-35% reduction in list prices for the reference biologic. Market acceptance and biosimilar pricing strategies further influence actual price erosion.

3. What regulatory factors might influence future pricing?
Legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act introduces price negotiation mechanisms, potentially capping payer reimbursement levels, and increasing price transparency, which can affect manufacturer pricing strategies.

4. Are new manufacturing technologies likely to reduce prices?
Advances like cell-line optimization and continuous manufacturing can lower production costs over time, possibly translating into reduced prices or improved margins for manufacturers.

5. How can stakeholders maximize value amid price declines?
Investment in differentiated clinical data, patient support programs, and value-based contracting agreements can help maintain revenue streams despite downward price pressures.


References

  1. IQVIA Institute. (2022). The Growing Market for Biologic Medicines.
  2. SSR Health. (2022). Biologic Price Trends and Biosimilar Impact.
  3. FDA. (2023). Biosimilar Development and Approval.
  4. Congressional Budget Office. (2022). Legislative Impacts on Drug Pricing.
  5. Industry Reports. (2023). Future of Biosimilars in Oncology.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available data and industry trends up to 2023. Actual market conditions may vary, and stakeholders should conduct ongoing research for precise planning.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.