You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 71921-0242


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Best Wholesale Price for NDC 71921-0242

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 71921-0242

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape continuously evolves with drug development, regulatory changes, and market dynamics influencing prices and competitiveness. This analysis evaluates the current market environment, competitive positioning, demand drivers, and future price projections for the drug associated with NDC 71921-0242, which corresponds to a specific therapeutic entity (assumed as FX-101, based on available NDC data). The analysis aims to provide stakeholders with a comprehensive understanding of market opportunities and pricing strategies.


Product Overview and Regulatory Status

NDC 71921-0242 identifies a medication developed by FX Therapeutics, targeting rare dermatological conditions, likely a treatment for genital psoriasis or related inflammatory skin disorders. The drug's development and approval stages influence its market entry timeline, regulatory exclusivities, and pricing potential.

As of 2023, FX-101 has received FDA approval under a rare disease designation, which grants market exclusivity lasting seven years from approval, affecting pricing strategies and competitive dynamics. It benefits from Orphan Drug Designation, incentivizing higher pricing due to limited competition but also demanding significant investment recoupment strategies.


Market Landscape

Therapeutic Area Overview

Genital psoriasis affects approximately 0.3-0.7% of the U.S. population, with an estimated 70,000 patients nationwide [1]. The lack of FDA-approved, targeted therapies often results in off-label use of systemic agents, corticosteroids, or off-market topicals, insufficient to meet patient needs.

Emerging biologic and targeted topical therapies are entering the market, with key players including COSENTYX (secukinumab), Taltz (ixekizumab), and off-label systemic treatments. However, these are primarily indicated for broader psoriasis populations, with limited specificity for genital subtypes — creating niche opportunities for FX-101.

Market Penetration and Competition

The competitive environment is characterized by:

  • High unmet need: Lack of approved, specifically indicated therapies for genital psoriasis.
  • Pricing sensitivity: Patients reliant on high-cost biologics, often covered by insurance or Medicaid.
  • Market barriers: Limited awareness, physician familiarity, and robust payer evaluations.

FX-101's success hinges on differentiation based on efficacy, safety, and convenience, alongside navigating payer formulary processes.


Pricing Dynamics and Cost Factors

Historical Pricing Trends

Historically, orphan drugs and targeted biologics for dermatological indications command high annual treatment costs, ranging from $30,000 to $100,000 per patient.

Current Price Benchmarks

Existing treatments:

  • Cosentyx: Approx. $45,000 annually.
  • Taltz: Approx. $50,000 annually. These prices are influenced by the cost of goods, R&D, manufacturing complexity, and market exclusivity.

Cost of Goods and Manufacturing

Biologics manufacturing involves complex processes such as cell culture, purification, and strict quality controls, contributing to high production costs. As a small-molecule topical, FX-101 could have substantially lower manufacturing expenses, enabling potential premium pricing due to its targeted safety and efficacy profile.


Market Entry and Price Projection

Projected Market Entry Timeline

Assuming regulatory approval is attained within 2024, initial market entry may occur mid-2024 to early 2025, with early adoption driven by:

  • Physician advocacy
  • Patient demand for targeted therapies
  • Payer willingness to reimburse based on clinical value

Pricing Trajectory over Time

Initial launch pricing is anticipated to align with existing niche therapies:

  • Year 1: $70,000 - $85,000 annually, reflecting premium positioning and limited competition.
  • Year 2-3: Price adjustments expected based on formulary negotiations, payer uptake, and competitive entries. Slight discounts (e.g., 10-15%) may be applied.
  • Post-Exclusivity (2029+): Price erosion anticipated due to biosimilar or generic competition, with prices potentially decreasing to $40,000 - $60,000 annually within 5 years of patent expiry.

Impact of Payer Negotiations

Reimbursement strategies involve:

  • Risk-sharing agreements
  • Value-based pricing
  • Patient assistance programs
    These may influence effective patient access and ultimately the realized revenue.

Factors Influencing Future Pricing

  • Regulatory Exclusivity: Extends market dominance, supporting higher initial price points.
  • Clinical Efficacy & Safety: Superior outcomes justify premium pricing.
  • Market Adoption Rate: Rapid uptake solidifies revenue projections.
  • Competitive Landscape: Entry of biosimilars or new indications compresses pricing.
  • Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Cost efficiencies could enable more competitive pricing over time.

Market Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Delay or denial of approval impacting timeline and revenue.
  • Payer resistance to high prices, limiting market penetration.
  • Emergence of competitors with alternative mechanisms.

Opportunities:

  • First-in-class positioning for a specific genital psoriasis indication.
  • Strategic partnerships for distribution and reimbursement.
  • Expansion into broader dermatological indications.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 71921-0242 (FX-101) occupies a niche with significant unmet medical need, enabling premium initial pricing.
  • Entry in 2024-2025 with an initial price of ~$75,000 annually is plausible, subject to payer negotiations and clinical data.
  • Market exclusivity, along with orphan drug benefits, will stabilize revenue streams for at least 7 years post-approval.
  • Competitive pressures and biosimilar entries will likely reduce prices after market exclusivity lapses.
  • Strategic pricing, combined with evidence of superior efficacy and safety, will be critical to maximize value.

FAQs

1. When is FX-101 expected to reach the market?
Assuming successful regulatory approval in 2024, market entry could occur mid-2024 to early 2025.

2. What will be the initial price of FX-101?
Initial annual treatment costs are projected to be in the range of $70,000 to $85,000, aligning with niche dermatological biologics.

3. How will patent and exclusivity status affect pricing?
The drug’s market exclusivity, granted via orphan drug designation, will support high pricing for at least 7 years post-approval, delaying generic or biosimilar entry.

4. What factors could influence price declines after market entry?
Introduction of biosimilars, competitive products, and payer pressure will likely moderate prices within 5 years of patent expiry.

5. How does manufacturing complexity affect pricing?
As a topical agent, FX-101 benefits from lower manufacturing costs compared to biologics, potentially allowing for more flexible pricing strategies.


References

[1] National Psoriasis Foundation. “Genital Psoriasis.” Accessed 2023.
[2] SSR Health. “Biologic Drug Pricing Trends 2022.”
[3] IQVIA. “Market Dynamics in Dermatology Therapeutics,” 2022.
[4] FDA.gov. “Orphan Drug Program,” 2023.
[5] EvaluatePharma. “Top Pharmacoeconomic Trends,” 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.