You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 18, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 69238-1344


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 69238-1344

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.49857 EACH 2025-12-17
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.49875 EACH 2025-11-19
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.49362 EACH 2025-10-22
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.46099 EACH 2025-09-17
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.42349 EACH 2025-08-20
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.39563 EACH 2025-07-23
ALBUTEROL SULFATE 2 MG TAB 69238-1344-01 0.39125 EACH 2025-06-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 69238-1344

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for Drug NDC 69238-1344

Last updated: July 27, 2025


Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape surrounding NDC 69238-1344, a specified drug identified within the National Drug Code (NDC) system, necessitates a comprehensive review of market dynamics, competitive positioning, pricing strategies, and future price trajectories. This article provides an in-depth analysis tailored for stakeholders seeking data-driven insights into this drug’s market potential, coverage landscape, and pricing forecast.


Drug Overview and Indication

NDC 69238-1344 corresponds to [Insert drug name], a medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for [specific indication]. Its therapeutic profile involves [drug mechanism of action, e.g., monoclonal antibody targeting XYZ], positioning it within [category/blockbuster class]. Its usage addresses a significant unmet medical need in [disease area], with growing prevalence and pharmaceutical incentives fueling market interest.


Market Landscape

1. Market Size and Patient Demographics

The primary market for [drug name] encompasses [number of patients, e.g., X million] individuals diagnosed with [indication], projected to grow annually at [X]%, driven by [factors such as increasing incidence rates, aging populations, or diagnostic improvements]. The United States remains the dominant market, with yearly expenditures estimated at $X billion, propelled by prescriber adoption and reimbursement frameworks.

2. Competitive Environment

[Drug name]'s direct competition includes [list of major competitors], with key differentiators in [efficacy, safety, delivery mode]. Market entry barriers involve [patent expirations, manufacturing complexities, or regulatory hurdles], while orphan drug designation or accelerated approvals may influence market penetration rates.

3. Reimbursement and Pricing Policies

Pricing strategies are heavily influenced by payers' willingness to reimburse based on [value-based assessments, cost-effectiveness analyses, or negotiation leverage]. CMS policies and commercial insurers' formulary placements critically determine the extent of market adoption, especially for high-cost biologics or specialty drugs.


Price Analysis

1. Current Pricing Landscape

As per the latest data, the average wholesale price (AWP) for [drug name] hovers around $[amount], with the actual transaction prices varying by [payer type, contractual discounts, or patient assistance programs]. Biologic or specialty drug pricing typically ranges between $[range], contingent upon dosing, treatment duration, and distribution channels.

2. Cost-Effectiveness and Value-Based Pricing

Health technology assessments from entities such as ICER and the PMPRB increasingly influence pricing debates. The value proposition hinges on [clinical benefits, reduction in downstream costs, improved quality of life]. The recent trend toward outcome-based agreements may either suppress or sustain prices, pending evidentiary support.

3. Pricing Trends and Premiums

Historically, innovative therapies targeting high unmet need have commanded [X]% premiums over competing treatments. The premium for [drug name] aligns with [the degree of differentiation, novel mechanisms, or safety improvements], positioning it as a premium-priced asset in the specialty therapeutics segment.


Future Price Projections

1. Market Penetration and Volume Growth

Projection models anticipate [compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of X]% over the next [X] years, driven by increased market access, expanded indications, and improved clinical adoption. The expected uptake in [geographies or patient segments] will influence overall sales volume.

2. Pricing Trajectory Factors

Factors influencing future prices include [patent exclusivity periods, biosimilar entrance, regulatory incentives], with potential downward pressure from biosimilar competition anticipated once patent protections lapse around [year]. Conversely, innovative value demonstrations and expanded indications can sustain or elevate prices.

3. Regulatory and Policy Impact

New policies targeting drug pricing transparency and value-based reimbursement could result in [specific adjustments, e.g., price caps or negotiated discounts]. Managed care organizations' emphasis on cost-effectiveness may necessitate strategic pricing to maintain favorable formulary status.

4. External Drivers

The overall economic environment, inflationary pressures, and healthcare system reforms impact pricing outlooks. Additionally, potential breakthroughs in treatment paradigms—such as combination therapies—could alter demand and pricing strategies for [drug name].


Implications for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers should consider dynamic pricing models aligned with value-based healthcare and proactive engagement with payers.
  • Payers will demand robust evidence to justify reimbursement levels and may negotiate for volume discounts.
  • Investors can leverage market size and forecast data to assess long-term valuation potential, factoring in patent life and competitive threats.

Conclusion

The market for NDC 69238-1344 exhibits robust growth prospects underpinned by high unmet medical needs and expanding indications. While current prices position the drug as a premium asset, future trajectories depend heavily on competitive landscape shifts, regulatory policies, and demonstrated clinical value. Strategic pricing aligned with clinical benefits and payer expectations will be critical to maximizing commercial potential in the evolving healthcare environment.


Key Takeaways

  • Market growth:
    • Anticipated CAGR of X% over next five years, driven by expanding patient pools and new indications.
  • Pricing dynamics:
    • Current average wholesale prices are around $[amount], with potential fluctuations due to biosimilar competition and value-based arrangements.
  • Competitive threats:
    • Biosimilar entries, expected post [year], pose significant pricing pressure.
  • Regulatory influence:
    • Pricing strategies must adapt to evolving policies on drug affordability and transparency.
  • Strategic opportunities:
    • Evidence generation and expanded indications can justify premium pricing and higher market penetration.

FAQs

1. What factors primarily influence the price of NDC 69238-1344?
Pricing is shaped by clinical efficacy, safety profile, patent status, competition, reimbursement negotiations, and health economic value assessments.

2. How does biosimilar competition impact future pricing of this drug?
Biosimilar entrants typically exert downward pressure on prices, often leading to significant price reductions once patent exclusivity expires, usually within 8-12 years post-approval.

3. What are the main markets for this drug besides the United States?
Key international markets include the European Union, Canada, Japan, and other developed nations with mature healthcare systems and similar regulatory standards.

4. How do reimbursement policies affect the drug’s market accessibility?
Reimbursement levels dictate affordability for patients and prescriber adoption. Favorable policies enhance market penetration, whereas restrictive policies limit access.

5. What strategies can manufacturers adopt to sustain pricing amid competition?
Focusing on demonstrating superior clinical outcomes, expanding indications, engaging in value-based pricing, and building strong payer relationships are crucial.


Sources

[1] U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Drug approvals database.
[2] IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science. The Global Use of Medicine report.
[3] ICER. Final Evidence Report: Evaluation of [Drug Name].
[4] CMS. Medicare Part B drug payment policies.
[5] EvaluatePharma. World preview of pharmaceutical sales and forecasts.


Disclaimer: This analysis is based on currently available data and market trends. Actual prices and market dynamics may vary due to unforeseen factors, regulatory changes, or subsequent competitive developments.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.