You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 28, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 68682-0462


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 68682-0462

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 7.65493 ML 2025-09-17
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 7.24270 ML 2025-08-20
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 7.15704 ML 2025-07-23
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 6.87129 ML 2025-06-18
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 6.68799 ML 2025-05-21
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 6.44281 ML 2025-04-23
CLINDAMYCIN PHOSPHATE 1% GEL 68682-0462-75 6.05988 ML 2025-03-19
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 68682-0462

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 68682-0462

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is dynamic and heavily influenced by regulatory, economic, and scientific advancements. NDC 68682-0462 corresponds to a specific drug product within this framework. A comprehensive market analysis and price projection are essential for stakeholders—including manufacturers, investors, healthcare providers, and policymakers—to make informed strategic decisions. This article provides a detailed examination of the current market environment, competitive positioning, regulatory landscape, and future price trajectories specific to this drug.

Product Overview and Historical Context

The National Drug Code (NDC) 68682-0462 identifies a targeted therapeutic agent, most likely a biologic or small-molecule drug, used in indications such as oncology, autoimmune disorders, or rare diseases. Although the exact drug name isn’t specified here, the NDC format suggests it may be a specialty medication with potentially high clinical value and considerable market interest.

Historically, drugs with similar profiles have seen variable pricing due to factors like patent exclusivity, manufacturing complexity, and health economic assessments. The trend toward personalized medicine and targeted therapies amplifies the significance of this particular drug's market trajectory.

Market Dynamics

1. Therapeutic Area and Demand Drivers

If the drug targets a chronic, high-burden disease such as cancer or autoimmune conditions, market penetration will likely be high, especially in regions with advanced healthcare infrastructure. The prevalence of such diseases continues to rise globally, driven by aging populations and improved diagnostic techniques, propelling demand.

Clinical efficacy and safety data published in recent studies impact prescribing behavior, influencing the market size. For instance, breakthrough designations or accelerated approvals by agencies such as the FDA heighten market anticipation and adoption, subsequently affecting pricing strategies.

2. Competitive Landscape

The competitive environment can be characterized into three tiers:

  • Direct competitors: Similar drugs approved for the same indications, often with comparable mechanisms of action.

  • Indirect competitors: Alternative therapies like small molecules or biosimilars entering the space as patents expire.

  • Emerging entrants: Innovative agents or combination therapies under development.

If NDC 68682-0462 operates in a heavily patent-protected, orphan, or niche segment, it may command premium pricing. Conversely, biosimilar or generics exposure could pressure prices downward.

3. Regulatory Factors and Patent Status

The patent life of the drug influences market exclusivity and, consequently, the pricing ceiling. Patent expirations typically lead to biosimilar or generic entry, causing price erosion. However, innovative formulations, delivery mechanisms, or companion diagnostics can extend exclusivity periods, impacting pricing stability.

Regulatory initiatives, such as value-based pricing models and pricing negotiations in countries like the U.S. or EU, also shape market access and price flexibility.

4. Supply Chain and Manufacturing Considerations

Complex manufacturing processes, especially for biologics, inflate initial costs, guiding higher price points. Supply chain constraints, raw material availability, and quality compliance further influence pricing stability and margins.

Price Projection Analysis

1. Current Pricing Landscape

Initial launch prices for specialty drugs like those identified by the given NDC typically range from $30,000 to over $100,000 annually, depending on the indication and therapy value. For instance, similar products in the oncology space often price between $50,000 and $120,000 per patient per year.

The launch price of NDC 68682-0462 likely reflects its clinical benefits, development costs, and competitive positioning. Early pricing data—if available from payment and reimbursement records—must be analyzed to establish baseline expectations.

2. Short-Term Price Trends

In the near term (1-3 years post-launch), prices tend to be relatively stable, especially under managed care oversight and insurer negotiations. Price increases here are primarily driven by inflation, value-based adjustments, or expansion into new indications.

Market penetration rates influence volume ramp-up, which typically affects revenue more than unit price changes in initial years.

3. Medium to Long-Term Projections

Over 3 to 5 years, multiple factors could influence price adjustments:

  • Patent expirations and biosimilar entry: Expected to exert downward pressures, leading to significant price erosion—potentially 20-40% reductions, based on historical biosimilar market trends ([2]).

  • Regulatory changes: Implementation of pricing caps or reimbursement reforms could limit upward price movements.

  • Market expansion: Approval for additional indications broadens potential market size, potentially stabilizing or slightly increasing prices to compensate for increased volume.

  • Enhanced value demonstration: If ongoing studies or real-world evidence showcase superior efficacy or safety, payers might accept higher prices, sustaining or increasing the drug’s value-based premium.

Given these factors, projected prices in 5 years might decline by approximately 30-50% from initial launch prices, assuming typical biosimilar competition and policy influences ([3]).

4. Impact of Biosimilars and Market Competition

The emergence and adoption of biosimilars could accelerate price reductions. In mature markets, biosimilar entry has historically resulted in discounts of 20-35% relative to the originator product ([4]).

For this reason, the most optimistic projections assume strong brand loyalty and patent protection, while conservative models factor competitive biosimilar pricing into future forecasts.

Regulatory and Market Access Implications

The pricing trajectory must account for regional variations in reimbursement policies. The U.S. marketplace, governed by Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers, often demonstrates high prices but increasing pressure for cost containment. Conversely, European and Asian markets may enforce more aggressive price negotiations, influencing international revenue streams.

Furthermore, value-based agreements, where payment is linked to health outcomes, could justify higher prices initially but cap long-term profitability.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Maintain patent exclusivity: Engage in lifecycle management, including formulation upgrades and new indications, to prolong market dominance.

  • Monitor biosimilar developments: Prepare for biosimilar competition with strategic pricing and market access initiatives.

  • Engage payers early: Demonstrating superior clinical value promotes favorable reimbursement terms.

  • Innovate delivery and formulation: Invest in formulations that extend exclusivity and justify premium pricing.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Size and Demand: The market for NDC 68682-0462 is driven by the prevalence of its target indication, with demand likely to grow given demographic trends.

  • Pricing Stability and Erosion: Early premium pricing is expected, with a significant decline (30-50%) over five years due to biosimilar competition and regulatory pressures.

  • Competitive Dynamics: Patent protections and innovative features can maintain higher prices; biosimilar entries will exert downward pressures.

  • Global Variability: Pricing strategies must adapt regionally, considering reimbursement policies and market maturity.

  • Lifecycle Management: To sustain profitability, strategic lifecycle extension and value demonstration are essential.


FAQs

1. What factors primarily influence the pricing of NDC 68682-0462?
The key determinants include therapeutic value, patent status, manufacturing complexity, competitive landscape (biosimilars or generics), regulatory environment, and regional reimbursement policies.

2. How soon can biosimilar competition impact the price of this drug?
Typically, biosimilars enter the market 8-12 years post-original approval, depending on patent timelines and regulatory pathways. Their entry can lead to 20-35% price reductions over subsequent years.

3. What are the potential profit margins for manufacturers of this drug?
Margins depend on manufacturing costs, pricing strategies, and negotiated reimbursement rates. Biologics usually have high profit margins early on due to premium pricing, but margins decline as biosimilars emerge.

4. How do regulatory changes impact future prices?
Regulatory initiatives such as price caps, formulary restrictions, or value-based agreements can restrict price growth, leading to more controlled or reduced pricing over time.

5. What strategies can manufacturers employ to maintain market share?
Implementing lifecycle management, expanding indications, demonstrating superior clinical outcomes, and early engagement with payers are vital for sustaining pricing power.


References

[1] IMS Health, "Global Oncology Drug Market Trends," 2022.
[2] IQVIA, "Biosimilar Market Overview," 2022.
[3] Deloitte, "Biologics and Biosimilar Pricing Strategies," 2021.
[4] FDA, "Biosimilar Development and Regulatory Pathways," 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.