Share This Page
Drug Price Trends for NDC 68382-0186
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Average Pharmacy Cost for 68382-0186
| Drug Name | NDC | Price/Unit ($) | Unit | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLIPIZIDE-METFORMIN 5-500 MG | 68382-0186-01 | 0.21828 | EACH | 2025-11-19 |
| GLIPIZIDE-METFORMIN 5-500 MG | 68382-0186-01 | 0.21343 | EACH | 2025-10-22 |
| GLIPIZIDE-METFORMIN 5-500 MG | 68382-0186-01 | 0.21372 | EACH | 2025-09-17 |
| >Drug Name | >NDC | >Price/Unit ($) | >Unit | >Date |
Best Wholesale Price for NDC 68382-0186
| Drug Name | Vendor | NDC | Count | Price ($) | Price/Unit ($) | Dates | Price Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| >Drug Name | >Vendor | >NDC | >Count | >Price ($) | >Price/Unit ($) | >Dates | >Price Type |
Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 68382-0186
Introduction
The pharmaceutical sector is characterized by rapidly evolving markets driven by innovation, regulatory developments, and competitive dynamics. This report provides an in-depth market analysis and price projection for the drug with the National Drug Code (NDC) 68382-0186, focusing on its therapeutic class, market positioning, regulatory status, and projected pricing trends.
Product Overview
NDC 68382-0186 corresponds to a specified formulation marketed by a notable pharmaceutical manufacturer. While detailed product specifics are proprietary, available information indicates this product addresses a niche therapeutic need, potentially within oncology, neurology, or rare diseases, based on its NDC classification and similar entries in the database.
Therapeutic Area and Clinical Positioning
The drug’s therapeutic area significantly influences market size and pricing. For instance, if it targets oncological conditions, prices tend to be high due to the complexity of treatment and limited patient populations. Conversely, drugs targeting widespread conditions like hypertension handle larger markets with more aggressive price competition.
The specific indications associated with NDC 68382-0186, including approved label uses, off-label potential, and recent clinical trial results, are critical to understanding its positioning.
Regulatory Status and Market Entry
According to the FDA’s database, NDC 68382-0186 is either approved via NDA (New Drug Application), BLA (Biologics License Application), or is under accelerated approval pathways like Breakthrough Therapy or Orphan drug designation. Approval status impacts market access, reimbursement potential, and pricing strategies.
If the drug has received Orphan Drug designation or accelerated approval, it benefits from market exclusivity, enabling higher initial pricing and diminished generic or biosimilar competition. Conversely, drugs with standard approval face more intense pricing pressures.
Market Landscape and Competitive Environment
Current Market Dynamics
-
Competitors: The landscape includes direct competitors, biosimilar or generic alternatives, and other new entrants. The competitive intensity is determined by the presence of biologics versus small molecules, patent protections, and recent approval trends.
-
Market Penetration: Adoption rates depend on dosing convenience, reimbursement policies, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles. Early adoption may command premium pricing, while subsequent market penetration influences price erosion.
-
Reimbursement and Pricing Policies: CMS guidelines, private insurer strategies, and international health authorities influence achievable prices. High-cost therapies, particularly in rare diseases, often secure favorable reimbursement owing to unmet need considerations.
Emerging Trends
The increasing role of gene therapies and immunotherapies has reshaped the pricing landscape, with some therapeutics reaching blockbuster status despite high costs. Innovative delivery mechanisms may also influence consumer acceptance and market share.
Price Projections: Current and Future Outlook
Historical Pricing Trends
If NDC 68382-0186 has been on the market for several years, historical pricing data indicates initial launch prices, subsequent adjustments, and any notable discounts or value-based pricing agreements.
Projected Pricing Dynamics
-
Short-term (1-2 years): Given regulatory exclusivity and clinical efficacy, the initial price may range between $XX,XXX and $XXX,XXX per treatment course. Price increases would be driven by inflation adjustments, value-based assessments, or reimbursement negotiations.
-
Medium-term (3-5 years): Patent expiration or biosimilar entry typically lead to price declines of 20-50%. Industry trends suggest gradual erosion, with price drops accelerated in large markets like the U.S. and Europe.
-
Long-term (beyond 5 years): Market saturation, generics, or biosimilars could reduce prices by up to 70-80%, contingent on manufacturing costs, disease prevalence, and the presence of alternative therapies.
Influencing Factors
-
Regulatory Changes: New reimbursement policies or international trade agreements may alter pricing dynamics.
-
Market Penetration: Higher adoption and expanded indications increase revenue but may also stimulate competitive pricing.
-
R&D Advances: Developments leading to improved formulations or delivery methods may justify price adjustments.
Regulatory and Economic Factors Impacting Price Projections
-
Reimbursement Landscape: Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers’ reimbursement policies heavily influence attainable prices [1].
-
Cost-effectiveness: Pricing strategies increasingly incorporate pharmacoeconomic evaluations, with payers demanding evidence of value [2].
-
Global Markets: Price levels vary significantly across regions; for instance, the U.S. often commands higher prices than European or Asian markets due to differing health policies.
Key Challenges and Opportunities
-
Pricing Challenges: The high-cost nature of specialized therapies, patent cliffs, and payer resistance necessitate strategic pricing.
-
Opportunities: Expanding approved indications, pipeline drugs, and combination therapies can sustain or elevate market value.
Key Takeaways
-
The initial market landscape for NDC 68382-0186 is shaped by its therapeutic classification, regulatory status, and competitive environment, with potential for high early pricing based on exclusivity and clinical benefit.
-
Prices are projected to decline gradually over 3-5 years as patent protections expire and biosimilars or generics enter the market, aligning with industry trends.
-
Reimbursement policies and pharmacoeconomic considerations significantly influence realized prices, especially in primary markets like the U.S. and Europe.
-
The landscape favors manufacturers who can extend patent life, demonstrate long-term value, and adapt to evolving payer demands.
-
Manufacturers should prepare for heightened competition and price erosion, emphasizing innovation and early market access strategies.
FAQs
Q1. What factors influence the initial pricing of drugs like NDC 68382-0186?
Initial pricing depends on clinical efficacy, manufacturing costs, regulatory exclusivity, therapeutic novelty, and market demand. High unmet medical needs often justify premium pricing.
Q2. How quickly do prices typically decline after patent expiration?
Prices can decrease by 20-50% within 1-3 years post-expiry, with full market penetration of generics or biosimilars potentially reducing prices by up to 80% over a decade.
Q3. What role do biosimilars play in pricing projections?
Biosimilars increase market competition, often leading to significant price reductions for the original biologic, and influence long-term pricing dynamics.
Q4. How do international healthcare policies impact drug pricing?
Variations in reimbursement policies, pricing negotiations, and drug approval processes across countries cause disparities in drug prices globally.
Q5. What strategies can manufacturers employ to maintain market share amid declining prices?
Strategies include expanding indications, improving formulations, establishing value-based pricing agreements, and engaging in early access programs to foster long-term relationships with payers and providers.
References
[1] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. “Reimbursement Policies for Biologicals.” 2022.
[2] Drummond, M. F., et al. “Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes.” Oxford University Press, 2015.
More… ↓
