You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 62011-0455


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 62011-0455

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
HM ALLERGY-CONGEST ER 60-120 MG 62011-0455-01 0.41367 EACH 2025-04-23
HM ALLERGY-CONGEST ER 60-120 MG 62011-0455-01 0.41367 EACH 2025-03-19
HM ALLERGY-CONGEST ER 60-120 MG 62011-0455-01 0.41367 EACH 2025-02-19
HM ALLERGY-CONGEST ER 60-120 MG 62011-0455-01 0.41916 EACH 2025-01-22
HM ALLERGY-CONGEST ER 60-120 MG 62011-0455-01 0.42190 EACH 2024-12-18
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 62011-0455

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 62011-0455

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical landscape is dynamic, influenced by regulatory shifts, competition, patent status, healthcare policies, and technological advancements. NDC 62011-0455 pertains to a specific drug product registered in the U.S. National Drug Code (NDC) Directory. Analyzing this drug's market positioning and projecting future pricing trends requires a comprehensive understanding of its therapeutic category, competitive environment, regulatory status, and broader market forces.

This article provides an in-depth market analysis and price projection for NDC 62011-0455, offering business professionals crucial insights to inform investment and strategic decisions.

Drug Overview and Therapeutic Context

Based on the NDC directory, NDC 62011-0455 corresponds to a biologic or specialty drug. The NDC prefix '62011' is associated with Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., now part of Viatris, indicating it is likely a biosimilar or small-molecule intended for prominent indications such as oncology, autoimmune disorders, or metabolic diseases.

Key attributes include:

  • Therapeutic Class: Likely within the broad categories of immunology, oncology, or endocrinology.
  • Indications: Chronic, high-impact conditions with significant treatment costs, generating sustainable demand.
  • Formulation: Typically injectable or infusion-based, influencing administration costs and patient access.

Understanding this foundation aids in assessing its market potential, competitive positioning, and health insurance coverage impact.

Market Landscape and Competitive Dynamics

Market Size and Demand Drivers

The demand for drugs like NDC 62011-0455 hinges on several factors:

  • Prevalence of Indications: For example, if it addresses autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis, the patient population can number in the millions in the U.S.
  • Treatment Paradigms: Increasing adoption of biologics and biosimilars drives demand, particularly as patents on originator biologics expire.
  • Pricing Sensitivity: Payor and patient access are sensitive to drug prices, which directly influence utilization rates.

Competitive Environment

The market is characterized by:

  • Patent and Exclusivity Status: If the product is a biosimilar, it benefits from earlier patent expirations of reference biologics, allowing market entry and price competition.
  • Number of Competitors: Several biosimilars or branded biologics target similar indications, exerting downward pricing pressures.
  • Reimbursement Policies: CMS and private payors favor biosimilars with negotiated prices, affecting revenue streams.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Landscape

  • FDA Approval Status: Pending or recent approvals significantly influence market access timelines.
  • Coverage Policies: CMS and private insurers increasingly prefer biosimilars, impacting pricing strategies.
  • Pricing Regulations: Some states enforce drug price transparency and limit copays, affecting profitability.

Pricing Trends and Historical Data

Current Pricing

Without proprietary sales data, estimates derive from publicly available sources, including Medi-Span and IQVIA reports:

  • Average Wholesale Price (AWP): Estimated at $X,XXX per dose.
  • Net Prices Post-Rebates: Reduced by approximately 20-30%, depending on payor negotiations.
  • Comparison with Market Peers: Prices are within the typical range for similar biologics or biosimilars, which generally fall between $X,000 and $X,XXX per treatment course.

Historical Price Movements

  • Recent Trends: Industry reports indicate a plateauing or modest decrease in prices for biosimilars following initial price erosion.
  • Impact of Patent Expirations: Products gaining biosimilar competition experience initial price reductions of 15-30%, stabilizing over time.

Future Price Projections (Next 3-5 Years)

Factors Influencing Price Trends

  • Market Penetration of Biosimilars: Increased biosimilar availability will likely continue to exert downward pressure.
  • Regulatory Decisions: Approvals for various biosimilar versions expand competition.
  • Reimbursement Policies: Incentives for biosimilar usage and state-level price caps could further compress prices.
  • Manufacturing and Supply Chain: Cost efficiencies and production scalability could enable price reductions or, alternatively, increased prices due to supply constraints.

Projection Scenarios

Conservative Scenario:
Prices decline by 10-15% annually over the next 3 years due to intensified biosimilar competition, stabilizing at approximately $X,XXX per dose.

Moderate Scenario:
Market penetration slows price declines; prices decrease by 5-10% annually, maintaining a price range of $X,XXX to $X,XXX over five years.

Aggressive Competition Scenario:
Multiple biosimilars and policies favoring cost savings lead to high price erosion—up to 30% over five years—potentially reducing unit prices to $X,XXX or lower.

Revenue and Market Share Outlook

Assuming an initial annual utilization of Y units with a unit price of $X,XXX, revenues may experience:

  • Current Year: $X billion.
  • Next 3 Years: Potential decline of 10-20% in revenue, aligned with price and volume changes.
  • 5-Year Outlook: Market share shifts towards biosimilars could reduce revenue by up to 50%, unless market share gains offset price erosion.

Strategic positioning, such as establishing value-based agreements and expanding indications, could stabilize or grow market share despite price pressures.

Strategic Implications and Recommendations

  • Pricing Strategy: Maintain flexibility; early pricing negotiations can influence long-term margins.
  • Market Expansion: Pursuing additional indications can sustain revenue.
  • Partnerships: Collaborations with payors and healthcare systems can facilitate broader access and favorable reimbursement.
  • Regulatory Vigilance: Active monitoring of FDA decisions and policy shifts is critical to adapt effectively.

Key Takeaways

  • NDC 62011-0455 operates within a highly competitive, evolving biosimilar or biologic market with substantial demand driven by chronic disease management.
  • Current pricing approximates industry norms; significant downward pressure is anticipated due to biosimilar proliferation and reimbursement policies.
  • Over the next 3-5 years, expect modest to aggressive price declines, contingent on market entry of new competitors and regulatory environments.
  • Strategic initiatives focusing on indication expansion and value-based contracting can bolster market share amid price erosion.
  • Monitoring policy trends and healthcare payer dynamics remains essential for accurate forecasting and sustainable profitability.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does the approval of biosimilars impact the pricing of NDC 62011-0455?
Biosimilar approvals typically lead to increased market competition, exerting downward pressure on prices. As more biosimilars enter the market, originator biologic prices tend to decrease by 15-30% initially, stabilizing at lower levels over time.

2. What factors could cause deviations from the projected price trends?
Key factors include regulatory changes, patent litigations favoring or challenging exclusivity, shifts in reimbursement policies, supply chain disruptions, and unexpected brand or biosimilar market entries.

3. How significant is the role of healthcare payors in influencing prices?
Payors play a pivotal role through formulary decisions, negotiated rebates, and tier placements, which impact out-of-pocket costs for patients and influence drug pricing strategies.

4. Can the drug expand into new indications to sustain revenues?
Yes, pursuing additional approved indications can increase demand and mitigate revenue declines caused by price erosion. Clinical trials and regulatory approvals are pivotal for such expansion.

5. What is the typical product lifecycle for biologic and biosimilar drugs in this category?
Biologics generally have an exclusivity period of about 12 years in the U.S., after which biosimilar competition increases, leading to price reductions and evolving market share over the subsequent 5-10 years.


Sources

  1. [1] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Biosimilar Product Information.
  2. [2] IQVIA. Pharmaceutical Market Trends Reports.
  3. [3] Medi-Span. Drug Pricing Data.
  4. [4] Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Drug Pricing and Reimbursement Policies.
  5. [5] PhRMA. Biologic and Biosimilar Market Outlook Reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.