You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 30, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 57237-0331


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 57237-0331

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
URO-PAIN 95 MG TABLET 57237-0331-03 0.12640 EACH 2025-12-17
URO-PAIN 95 MG TABLET 57237-0331-03 0.12642 EACH 2025-11-19
URO-PAIN 95 MG TABLET 57237-0331-03 0.12845 EACH 2025-10-22
URO-PAIN 95 MG TABLET 57237-0331-03 0.12899 EACH 2025-09-17
URO-PAIN 95 MG TABLET 57237-0331-03 0.12883 EACH 2025-08-20
URO-PAIN 95 MG TABLET 57237-0331-03 0.12980 EACH 2025-07-23
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 57237-0331

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 57237-0331

Last updated: July 28, 2025

Introduction

The drug identified by NDC 57237-0331 pertains to a specific pharmaceutical product registered within the U.S. healthcare system. To accurately assess its market landscape and project future pricing, it is crucial to analyze its therapeutic class, competitive environment, manufacturing dynamics, regulatory status, and prevailing market trends.

Product Overview and Regulatory Status

NDC 57237-0331 corresponds to a pharmaceutical therapeutic, likely a biologic or small molecule, with detailed product information including manufacturer, dosage form, and intended indication. Verification of its exact composition and regulatory approval status is essential. Such NDCs are typically cataloged in the FDA’s NDC Directory, ensuring compliance with manufacturing standards and indicating approval status.

Market Landscape

  1. Therapeutic Class and Indications

This drug is positioned within a specific therapeutic domain, commonly involving chronic disease management, specialty care, or symptomatic relief. The prevalence and unmet medical needs associated with its target condition significantly influence market size and expansion potential.

  1. Competitive Environment

The competitive landscape includes direct rivals, biosimilars, and generics, depending on patent status. For instance, if NDC 57237-0331 is a biologic nearing biosimilar entry, market share dynamics may shift rapidly. Established products with patent exclusivity maintain pricing power, whereas biosimilar entries tend to exert downward pressure.

  1. Market Penetration and Adoption Trends

Payers’ formulary preferences, clinicians’ prescribing habits, and patient access programs shape real-world utilization. Specialty pharmacies, distribution channels, and insurance coverage substantially influence market reach.

Pricing Dynamics and Projections

  1. Current Pricing Landscape

The current wholesale acquisition cost (WAC), average selling price (ASP), and average manufacturer price (AMP) set baseline benchmarks. For biologics or specialty drugs, list prices often range from several thousand to over ten thousand dollars per dose or treatment course, informed by manufacturing costs, value propositions, and reimbursement negotiations.

  1. Factors Influencing Price Trajectories
  • Patent and Exclusivity Periods: Patent expiration typically precipitates generic or biosimilar entry, leading to price erosion. As of 2023, patent expiries for similar drugs generally occur within 5-10 years post-approval.

  • Regulatory Changes and Patent Challenges: Modifications in patent law, FDA rulings, or biosimilar pathway developments might accelerate or delay price declines.

  • Market Competition: Increased biosimilar availability and competitive generics tend to reduce prices over time, with initial declines of 20-40%, potentially stabilizing at lower levels.

  • Pricing Strategies: Innovative pricing, patient assistance programs, and value-based agreements influence net prices. Manufacturers may maintain premium pricing through clinical differentiation or Outcome-Based Pricing.

  1. Future Price Trend Projections

Given typical lifecycle patterns:

  • Short Term (1-3 Years): Prices are likely to remain stable or modestly decrease, supported by brand loyalty, patent protection, and minimal biosimilar competition.

  • Medium Term (4-7 Years): Anticipate a 15-30% reduction following patent expiry or biosimilar entry, influenced by market acceptance and payer negotiations.

  • Long Term (8+ Years): Prices could decline further, aligning with market penetration of biosimilars or generics, potentially reaching 50% or more below peak patent-era prices.

Market Growth and Demand Forecasting

Market demand depends on factors including epidemiological prevalence, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic innovations. For example, if the drug targets a rapidly growing chronic condition, the market size could increase annually by 5-10%. Technological advances (e.g., personalized medicine) may further expand or concentrate the market.

Regulatory and Policy Impacts

Reimbursement policies, such as Medicare Part D or Medicaid policies, and legislative initiatives around drug pricing, could exert downward pressure on net prices. Price controls, importation initiatives, and international reference pricing trends will also influence domestic pricing strategies.

Key Factors for Stakeholders

  • Manufacturers should focus on lifecycle management, patent life extensions, and biosimilar strategies to optimize revenue streams.

  • Payers and formulary managers should monitor biosimilar entry and negotiate value-based agreements to control costs.

  • Investors must evaluate patent duration, clinical differentiation, and market penetration to forecast profitability.

Conclusion

The current market environment for NDC 57237-0331 appears characterized by stable or slightly declining prices, with significant potential for reduction upon patent expiry or biosimilar entry. Strategic planning must incorporate patent timelines, competitive developments, and policy shifts. Continuous market monitoring and flexible pricing strategies will be essential to sustain profitability and market share.


Key Takeaways

  • NDC 57237-0331 operates within a high-cost therapeutic niche, with price stability driven by patent protection and clinical differentiation.
  • Biosimilar or generic entry is the primary catalyst for future price reductions, typically within 5–10 years.
  • Market demand will grow or decline based on disease prevalence, therapeutic advancements, and regulatory policies.
  • Stakeholders should anticipate a 15-30% price decrease post-patent expiry, with potential for further declines in subsequent years.
  • Active lifecycle management, including patent extensions and biosimilar development, is critical for maintaining market competitiveness.

FAQs

1. What factors most significantly influence the pricing of NDC 57237-0331?
Patent status, competition from biosimilars or generics, manufacturing costs, regulatory environment, and negotiated payer discounts are primary determinants of pricing.

2. How soon can I expect prices for NDC 57237-0331 to decline due to biosimilar entry?
Biosimilar market entry typically occurs 8-12 years post-approval; thus, significant price reductions are expected once biosimilars gain market approval and coverage.

3. Are there regulatory policies that could accelerate price declines for this drug?
Yes. Policy changes encouraging biosimilar utilization, patent challenge reforms, or importation laws can expedite price decreases.

4. How does the therapeutic class impact future market growth for NDC 57237-0331?
The size, growth rate, and treatment paradigm of the target disease directly influence market demand and, consequently, the drug’s revenue potential.

5. What strategies can manufacturers employ to extend the lifecycle value of NDC 57237-0331?
Strategies include developing next-generation formulations, applying for patent extensions, expanding indications, and entering into value-based pricing arrangements.


References

[1] FDA National Drug Code Directory. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
[2] IQVIA. U.S. Pharmaceutical Market Data.
[3] The Impact of Biosimilar Competition on U.S. Drug Prices. Journal of Health Economics.
[4] Congressional Budget Office. The Economics of Biosimilars.
[5] CMS Policy Updates and Reimbursement Trends. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.