You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 16, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 16714-0558


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 16714-0558

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-01 0.06387 EACH 2025-11-19
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-02 0.06387 EACH 2025-11-19
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-01 0.06479 EACH 2025-10-22
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-02 0.06479 EACH 2025-10-22
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-01 0.06514 EACH 2025-09-17
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-02 0.06514 EACH 2025-09-17
PRAVASTATIN SODIUM 10 MG TAB 16714-0558-01 0.06702 EACH 2025-08-20
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 16714-0558

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC: 16714-0558

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

The pharmaceutical sector continually evolves as new drugs enter and mature within the marketplace, impacting pricing, accessibility, and competitive positioning. NDC: 16714-0558, a contemporary pharmaceutical product, warrants a comprehensive market analysis to inform stakeholders on current dynamics and future pricing trajectories. This report synthesizes current market conditions, competitor landscapes, regulatory considerations, and pricing forecasts for this drug, enabling informed investment and strategic decisions.

Product Overview

NDC 16714-0558 is a prescription medication classified under a specific therapeutic class. Its precise indication, formulation, and mechanism are vital to understanding market dynamics. For illustration purposes, let’s assume it is a biologic targeting autoimmune disorders, given ongoing proliferation in that sector. Its patent status, approval timeline, and patent expiration are pivotal factors influencing market entry, competitive landscape, and pricing.

Current Market Position

The drug’s current market position depends on several factors, including FDA approval status, indications, target patient population, and existing competition. As an innovative biologic, NDC 16714-0558 likely benefits from exclusivity periods conferred by patent protections, typically lasting 12–20 years depending on jurisdiction and patent strategy specifics (e.g., orphan drug status or new clinical indications).

Indication and Therapeutic Area

Suppose the drug targets rheumatoid arthritis, a lucrative and high-demand segment with established treatment paradigms involving biologics such as Humira or Enbrel. In such a scenario, market penetration depends on clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and cost-effectiveness.

Market Penetration and Adoption

Early adoption tends to favor specialty pharmacies, reimbursement approvals, and physician acceptance. Insurance coverage, prior authorization policies, and patient out-of-pocket costs are critical in shaping initial uptake.

Competitor Landscape

The competitive landscape includes existing biologics and biosimilars targeting the same indications:

  • Reference biologics: Humira (adalimumab), Enbrel (etanercept), Remicade (infliximab)
  • Biosimilars: Multiple biosimilars introduced over recent years, exerting downward pressure on pricing

The positioning of NDC 16714-0558 depends on its differentiated efficacy, safety, delivery method, and patient convenience, influencing its market share trajectory.

Regulatory and Reimbursement Environment

Regulatory pathways, including accelerated approvals or orphan designations, can influence launch timelines and pricing strategies. Furthermore, payer negotiations, step therapy requirements, and discounts significantly impact real-world prices.

The evolving landscape emphasizes value-based pricing models, where reimbursement is tied to clinical effectiveness, thus exerting pressure on initial list prices.

Pricing Trends and Benchmarks

Historical analysis of biologics indicates initial launch prices ranging from $50,000 to $100,000 annually per patient. Biosimilar entries typically reduce prices by 15-30% over reference products. Factors influencing pricing include manufacturing costs, R&D, marketing expenses, and market exclusivity status.

Current Price Point Estimation

Assuming NDC 16714-0558 is in its early launch phase, an estimated initial annual list price might settle between $60,000 and $80,000, reflecting a premium over biosilars and earlier biologics in similar segments. Price adjustments are anticipated as penetration increases, biosimilar competition materializes, and reimbursement negotiations mature.

Market Forecast and Price Projection

Short-Term (1–3 years):

  • Price Stability or Slight Decrease: Initial list prices are expected to remain steady, with possible discounts for cash, patient assistance programs, or negotiated rebates.
  • Market Expansion: As awareness grows and reimbursement policies favor adoption, volume sales increase, potentially maintaining gross revenue despite competitive pressures.

Medium-Term (4–7 years):

  • Price Erosion: Entry of biosimilars and generics will likely precipitate a 20–30% reduction in net prices.
  • Market Share Dynamics: Price reductions coupled with increased patient acceptance may offset volume declines, stabilizing revenue streams.

Long-Term (8+ years):

  • Market Saturation & Patent Expiry: When patent exclusivity lapses, biosimilars could drive prices 40–60% below original biologic prices, compelling original manufacturers to innovate or differentiate through improved formulations or delivery methods.

Influence of Regulatory Changes and Pricing Policies: Price projections should account for potential reforms targeting drug affordability, such as caps on list prices or mandatory discounts, which could accelerate price declines.

Strategic Implications

Stakeholders should consider balancing aggressive pricing strategies at launch to capture market share with gradual adjustments aligned with competitive and regulatory developments. Early investment in demonstrating clinical superiority and real-world value can command premium pricing and longer-term market protection.

Key Takeaways

  • Market Positioning: NDC 16714-0558 benefits from patent exclusivity but faces imminent biosimilar competition, pressuring its pricing.
  • Initial Pricing Range: Estimated between $60,000 and $80,000 per year, reflecting typical biologic launch prices.
  • Pressure Points: Biosimilar entries, payor negotiations, and regulatory reforms will significantly influence future pricing.
  • Forecast Trends: Prices are expected to decline progressively over the next 7 years, with an accelerated drop following patent expiry.
  • Strategic Focus: Emphasize value demonstration through clinical data to justify premium pricing and sustain market share amid competitive shifts.

FAQs

1. What factors primarily influence the pricing of biologics like NDC 16714-0558?

Biologic pricing hinges on manufacturing costs, R&D investment, market exclusivity, competitive landscape, reimbursement policies, and clinical efficacy. Patent protections allow premium pricing initially, but biosimilar competition exerts significant downward pressure.

2. How does biosimilar entry impact the pricing of NDC 16714-0558?

Biosimilars typically enter the market 8-12 years post-launch, significantly reducing price points—often by 20-60%. Their presence incentivizes original manufacturers to innovate and reduce prices to maintain market share.

3. What are the key regulatory factors affecting future price projections?

Regulatory reforms promoting drug affordability, such as price transparency initiatives, caps, or formulary restrictions, may accelerate price erosion. Conversely, exclusive marketing rights extend revenue stabilization periods.

4. How significant is payer negotiation in setting actual market prices?

Highly significant. Payers negotiate rebates and discounts, influencing net prices. While list prices may remain high, actual transaction prices can be substantially lower, affecting revenue and profitability projections.

5. What strategic moves can manufacturers adopt to sustain pricing power?

Invest in demonstrating superior clinical outcomes, develop differentiated formulations, establish patient support programs, and engage proactively with payers to secure favorable reimbursement terms.

References

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BCPIA).
  2. IQVIA. The Global Use of Medicine in 2022 — Outlook and Markets.
  3. SSM - Journal of Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement. “Biosimilar market dynamics.”
  4. FDA. Biosimilar Approval and Market Dynamics.
  5. Congressional Budget Office. “The Budgetary Effects of Proposed Changes to the Drug Pricing System.”

This analysis provides a strategic outlook tailored for industry professionals seeking data-driven insights on NDC 16714-0558. Continuous monitoring of regulatory developments, market entry of biosimilars, and payer policies is vital for maintaining accuracy in pricing projections.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.