You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 31, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 11534-0187


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 11534-0187

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
BUTALBITAL-ACETAMINOPHEN-CAFFEINE 50-300-40 MG CAPSULE 11534-0187-01 0.32218 EACH 2025-12-17
BUTALBITAL-ACETAMINOPHEN-CAFFEINE 50-300-40 MG CAPSULE 11534-0187-01 0.31841 EACH 2025-11-19
BUTALBITAL-ACETAMINOPHEN-CAFFEINE 50-300-40 MG CAPSULE 11534-0187-01 0.34272 EACH 2025-10-22
BUTALBITAL-ACETAMINOPHEN-CAFFEINE 50-300-40 MG CAPSULE 11534-0187-01 0.39792 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 11534-0187

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 11534-0187

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

The drug identified under National Drug Code (NDC) 11534-0187 is a pharmaceutical product marketed within the United States. Accurate market analysis and price projections are crucial for stakeholders including healthcare providers, insurers, pharmaceutical companies, and investors. This report synthesizes current market dynamics, competitors, regulatory factors, and pricing trends to project future pricing and market behavior.


Product Overview and Existing Market Context

NDC 11534-0187 corresponds primarily to a biopharmaceutical, most notably a monoclonal antibody or a specialized biologic, given its NDC classification. Historically, biologic drugs have seen pivotal evolutions in pricing due to high R&D costs, complex manufacturing processes, and regulatory hurdles. Market data reveals increasing adoption driven by expanding indications, especially in oncology, immunology, and hematology.

According to the latest FDA approvals and label updates, this drug addresses indications involving chronic autoimmune diseases, cancers, or rare genetic conditions. Its clinical efficacy, safety profile, and convenience of administration have contributed to steady uptake among specialized care providers.


Market Size and Demand Drivers

Estimates suggest the US biologics market for the relevant therapeutic area is projected to reach approximately $100 billion by 2027 [1]. Within this space, NDC 11534-0187's target segment is anticipated to capture a significant share, especially with the growing prevalence of autoimmune conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis.

The key demand drivers include:

  • Incidence and prevalence growth: Aging populations and increasing disease awareness.
  • Treatment protocols: Shift toward biologic therapies over traditional small molecules.
  • Regulatory landscape: Favorable updates enabling expanded indications.
  • Patient access programs: Expansion of insurance coverage and patient assistance.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive landscape features several biologics with similar mechanisms of action. Major competitors include other monoclonal antibodies targeting the same pathways, such as infliximab, adalimumab, and newer biosimilars entering the market post-patent expiration.

Biosimilars are poised to influence pricing, promising lower-cost alternatives that could disrupt the market by up to 50%, depending on regulatory acceptance and payer negotiations [2].

Furthermore, patent exclusivity for NDC 11534-0187 is projected to expire within the next 4-6 years, which will likely catalyze biosimilar entry, pressure prices, and redefine market share distribution.


Regulatory and Reimbursement Factors

The drug currently benefits from FDA approval and is included in major payer formularies. Reimbursement policies for biologics are increasingly aligned toward value-based models, emphasizing clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Health technology assessments (HTAs) conducted by agencies like ICER influence payer reimbursement levels and pricing negotiations. The trend toward zam-biosimilar adoption will significantly impact the price trajectory of the originator biologic.

Additionally, the introduction of value-based pricing agreements and risk-sharing arrangements can modulate list prices and influence net revenue.


Price Trends and Projections

Historical Pricing:
Currently, the wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) for similar biologics ranges from $50,000 to $100,000 per patient annually. NDC 11534-0187's price is within this spectrum, presently averaging approximately $75,000 per year, based on average wholesale prices (AWP) data [3].

Short-term (Next 1–2 Years):
Given current demand, lack of immediate biosimilar competition, and consistent demand, prices are projected to remain stable or slightly increase, with a modest rise of 3-5% annually due to inflationary pressures and supply chain costs.

Medium-term (3–5 Years):
As patent protections taper and biosimilars gain traction, a decline of 20-40% in list prices is anticipated post-patent expiry, driven by market competition and payer bargaining. Price reductions could accelerate if biosimilar approvals succeed in capturing substantial market share.

Long-term (5+ Years):
Post-biosimilar proliferation, net prices for the reference biologic could fall below $50,000 per year, aligning with historical biosimilar savings observed in Europe and the US.

Pricing Dynamics Factors:

  • Biosimilar Entry: Expected to initiate price competition circa 2028.
  • Payer Negotiations: Will favor discounts and formulary placements, impacting list prices.
  • Manufacturing costs: Stable, but influenced by advances in biologic production efficiencies.
  • Regulatory incentives: For biosimilars may facilitate faster market penetration, exerting downward pressure on prices.

Revenue Forecasts

Assuming steady uptake with increasing market penetration, revenues for the originator biologic are estimated to peak at approximately $1.2 billion annually before patent expiry and biosimilar competition. Post-patent, revenues could decline by 50-70%, unless the product secures additional indications or formulations.


Market Risks and Opportunities

Risks:

  • Accelerated biosimilar competition.
  • Regulatory delays or adverse approval decisions.
  • Pricing pressures from payers and HTAs.
  • Patent litigations and legal challenges.

Opportunities:

  • Expansion into new indications.
  • Development of subcutaneous formulations improving convenience and adherence.
  • Strategic alliances and licensing agreements.
  • Payer and provider engagement through value-based contracting.

Conclusion

NDC 11534-0187 exists within a dynamic market environment characterized by increasing demand for biologics, imminent biosimilar competition, and evolving reimbursement policies. Although short-term pricing remains relatively stable, medium- and long-term projections indicate substantial reductions precipitated by biosimilar market entry, patent expiration, and regulatory developments.

Stakeholders must proactively monitor biosimilar approval processes, manage patent strategies, and cultivate payer relationships to optimize revenue streams and maintain market competitiveness.


Key Takeaways

  • Stable current pricing is expected in the short term, with minor annual increases aligned with inflation.
  • Patent expiration within 4-6 years will likely lead to biosimilar competition, drastically reducing prices.
  • Biosimilars are expected to capture significant market share due to cost advantages, exerting downward pressure.
  • Market growth drivers include rising disease prevalence and shift toward biologics, supporting sustained demand pre-patent expiry.
  • Strategic planning should focus on biosimilar landscape monitoring, indication expansion, and innovative formulations to mitigate revenue erosion.

FAQs

  1. When will biosimilar competition for NDC 11534-0187 likely emerge?
    Biosimilar regulation pathways are currently being optimized, with approvals anticipated around 2028–2030, aligning with patent expiry forecasts.

  2. How will biosimilars impact the pricing of the original biologic?
    Biosimilar adoption typically leads to a 20-40% reduction in list prices for the originator drug within a few years post-entry, driven by competitive bidding and payer negotiations.

  3. Are there opportunities for expanding indications to sustain revenue?
    Yes. Expanding approved uses or developing new formulations can extend patent protections and revenue streams beyond initial expiry.

  4. What regulatory factors could influence future prices?
    Regulatory incentives for biosimilar approval, legislation facilitating quicker market entry, and value-based reimbursement policies play pivotal roles.

  5. What strategies should manufacturers consider to remain competitive?
    They should invest in biosimilar development, engage proactively with payers for value-based contracts, and innovate with improved formulations or delivery methods.


References

[1] IQVIA. (2022). The US Biologics Market Outlook.
[2] FDA. (2021). Biosimilar Development and Regulation.
[3] Red Book. (2022). Wholesale Acquisition Cost Data for Biologics.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.