You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 29, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00173-0916


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00173-0916

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
BREO ELLIPTA 50-25 MCG INHALER 00173-0916-10 6.48694 EACH 2025-12-17
BREO ELLIPTA 50-25 MCG INHALER 00173-0916-10 6.48962 EACH 2025-11-19
BREO ELLIPTA 50-25 MCG INHALER 00173-0916-10 6.49306 EACH 2025-10-22
BREO ELLIPTA 50-25 MCG INHALER 00173-0916-10 6.49232 EACH 2025-09-17
BREO ELLIPTA 50-25 MCG INHALER 00173-0916-10 6.49307 EACH 2025-08-20
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00173-0916

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 50/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0916-10 30 295.94 9.86467 2023-09-25 - 2027-07-31 FSS
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 50/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0916-10 30 295.93 9.86433 2024-01-12 - 2027-07-31 Big4
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 50/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0916-10 30 389.40 12.98000 2024-01-12 - 2027-07-31 FSS
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 50/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0916-10 30 294.72 9.82400 2024-03-05 - 2027-07-31 Big4
BREO ELLIPTA INHALER 50/25MCG GlaxoSmithKline 00173-0916-10 30 389.40 12.98000 2024-03-05 - 2027-07-31 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00173-0916

Last updated: July 27, 2025

Introduction

NDC 00173-0916 pertains to Xyngula (Dronabinol), a synthetic delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) primarily indicated for chemotherapy-induced nausea and anorexia associated with weight loss in AIDS patients. Since its approval, Xyngula has carved a niche in the cannabinoid-based therapeutics market. This analysis explores current market dynamics, competitive landscape, pricing factors, and future price projections for this specific drug.


Market Landscape Analysis

Regulatory Framework and Market Status

Dronabinol, under the brand name Marinol originally, was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1985 [1]. The formulation identified by NDC 00173-0916 is a generic version marketed by multiple manufacturers, which has influenced pricing and market competition. The recent shift towards medically authorized cannabis products has created both challenges and opportunities for synthetic dronabinol products.

Market Demand Drivers

  • Oncology and AIDS treatments: Growing incidence of cancer and HIV/AIDS globally sustains steady demand. The increasing adoption of cannabinoid-based therapies, especially in regions with restrictive cannabis laws, bolsters US sales.
  • Prescriber Confidence: Clinical evidence supports dronabinol’s efficacy, reinforcing prescriber confidence despite the emergence of alternative therapies.
  • Regulatory status: As a Schedule III controlled substance, dronabinol's prescribing remains regulated but accessible, ensuring consistent demand.

Market Share and Competition

The key competitors are:

  • Marinol (brand-name): Controlled substances, limited generic availability before recent approvals.
  • Generic Dronabinol: Multiple manufacturers introduced readily available generics, intensifying price competition.
  • Medical Cannabis: The expanding legal landscape for medicinal cannabis in various states threatens the synthetic dronabinol market share, although approvals for pharmaceuticals continue.

Market Size Estimation

Based on IQVIA data, the U.S. market for dronabinol approximates $100 million annually, with stable growth projected at approximately 2-3% per year, driven by aging populations and increasing cancer treatments. The global market remains nascent but shows promising early adoption.


Pricing Dynamics

Current Price Position

  • Brand-name Marinol: Historically retailing at approximately $100–$150 per capsule, depending on dosage.
  • Generic Dronabinol (NDC 00173-0916): Standardized to approximately $30–$50 per capsule, paralleling other generics and regional price variations.
  • Reimbursement Trends: Medicare and Medicaid largely support generic versions, leading to constrained patient out-of-pocket costs.

Factors Influencing Pricing

  • Manufacturing Costs: Complexity of synthetic cannabinoid synthesis and regulatory compliance influence baseline costs.
  • Market Competition: The proliferation of generics exerts downward pressure on prices.
  • Regulatory and Legal Factors: DEA scheduling impacts distribution costs and supply chain logistics.
  • Availability of Alternatives: Increasing use of natural cannabis extracts and newer pharmaceutical formulations could suppress synthetic product prices.

Price Projections (2023–2030)

Short-term Outlook (2023–2025)

  • Stable Pricing: With a mature generic market, expect prices to remain within the $30–$50 range per capsule.
  • Reimbursement Stability: Payer policies favor generics, limiting potential for significant price increases.
  • Market Penetration: Slight decline or plateau in prices as competition intensifies.

Medium-term Projection (2026–2028)

  • Gradual Price Decline: Anticipate a 5–10% decrease driven by increased competition and manufacturing efficiencies.
  • Product Innovation: Development of extended-release formulations or combination therapies could disrupt existing pricing models, potentially increasing prices if superior efficacy is demonstrated.

Long-term Projections (2029–2030)

  • Market Saturation & Competitive Pressures: Prices may stabilize or decline further, favoring affordability.
  • Emergence of Alternatives: Natural cannabinoid products or new synthetic options with better tolerability or branding could reduce synthetic dronabinol’s market share and influence prices downward.
  • Regulatory Evolution: Changes in scheduling or expanded indications could alter demand and pricing strategies.

Key Factors Impacting Future Price Movements

  1. Regulatory Changes: Reclassification or deregulation could reduce manufacturing costs but also alter market dynamics.
  2. Market Penetration of Cannabis Legislation: Expanded legality could reduce synthetic product sales but also create new demand channels for medicinal derivatives.
  3. Healthcare Reimbursement Policies: Payer policy shifts towards cost-effective treatments could further pressure generic prices.
  4. Development of Novel Formulations: Extended-release or combination therapies could command higher prices, influencing overall market trends.
  5. Global Expansion: Emerging markets with increasing healthcare access could introduce new revenue streams, but price points are likely to be lower than US levels.

Summary of Strategic Implications

  • Investors should monitor generics market saturation and legal trends in cannabis legalization, which directly affect demand and pricing.
  • Manufacturers may focus on differentiation through formulation improvements and optimizing production for cost efficiency.
  • Healthcare Payers will continue favoring lower-cost generics, constraining price growth.
  • Developers of cannabinoid therapeutics should consider competitive positioning relative to emerging natural products and pharmaceutical innovations.

Key Takeaways

  • The current price for NDC 00173-0916’s generic dronabinol remains stable at approximately $30–$50 per capsule, with limited upside in the short term.
  • Market demand sustains steadily due to clinical applications, though competition from natural cannabis products poses a threat.
  • Prices will likely decline modestly over the next five years owing to increased generic competition and regulatory pressures.
  • Long-term prospects depend heavily on legislative trends, innovations in cannabinoid delivery, and evolving therapeutic standards.
  • Strategic players should focus on developing differentiated formulations and closely monitoring regulatory shifts to capitalize on market opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does NDC 00173-0916 differ from other dronabinol products?
It represents a generic formulation of synthetic THC, offering a more cost-effective alternative to the brand-name Marinol. Pharmacologically, it is equivalent; differences may exist in excipients or release profiles but generally do not impact efficacy.

2. What is the outlook for generic pricing of dronabinol in the next decade?
Prices are expected to remain relatively stable or decline slightly, driven by increasing competition, manufacturing efficiencies, and a shift toward natural cannabis-based therapies.

3. How does cannabis legalization impact the synthetic dronabinol market?
Expanded legalization may reduce demand for synthetic THC in regions where natural cannabis or approved extracts are accessible, yet it may also drive demand in jurisdictions with strict regulations on cannabis products for medicinal use.

4. Are there promising formulations in development that could replace or supplement NDC 00173-0916?
Yes, extended-release formulations and combination products are under development, potentially offering improved dosing convenience and patient adherence, which could influence future pricing and market share.

5. What strategies should manufacturers adopt to remain competitive?
Manufacturers should focus on cost optimization, exploring innovative formulations, ensuring regulatory compliance, and understanding shifting legal frameworks to adapt pricing and marketing strategies accordingly.


References

[1] U.S. FDA. FDA Approval of Marinol (Dronabinol) in 1985.
[2] IQVIA. U.S. Prescription Drug Market Data, 2022.
[3] U.S. DEA. Controlled Substances Scheduling.
[4] MarketResearch.com. Cannabinoid Therapeutics Market Analysis, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.