You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drug Price Trends for NDC 00093-0753


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Average Pharmacy Cost for 00093-0753

Drug Name NDC Price/Unit ($) Unit Date
ATENOLOL 100 MG TABLET 00093-0753-01 0.04435 EACH 2025-11-19
ATENOLOL 100 MG TABLET 00093-0753-05 0.04435 EACH 2025-11-19
ATENOLOL 100 MG TABLET 00093-0753-01 0.04480 EACH 2025-10-22
ATENOLOL 100 MG TABLET 00093-0753-05 0.04480 EACH 2025-10-22
ATENOLOL 100 MG TABLET 00093-0753-05 0.04274 EACH 2025-09-17
ATENOLOL 100 MG TABLET 00093-0753-01 0.04274 EACH 2025-09-17
>Drug Name >NDC >Price/Unit ($) >Unit >Date

Best Wholesale Price for NDC 00093-0753

These are wholesale prices available to the US Federal Government which, by law, must be the best prices available under comparable terms and conditions
Drug Name Vendor NDC Count Price ($) Price/Unit ($) Dates Price Type
ATENOLOL 100MG TAB AvKare, LLC 00093-0753-01 100 5.83 0.05830 2024-01-15 - 2028-06-14 FSS
>Drug Name >Vendor >NDC >Count >Price ($) >Price/Unit ($) >Dates >Price Type
Price type key: Federal Supply Schedule (FSS): generally available to all Federal Govt agencies / 'BIG4' prices: VA, DoD, Public Health & Coast Guard only / National Contracts (NC): Available to specific agencies

Market Analysis and Price Projections for NDC 00093-0753

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

NDC 00093-0753 identifies a specific pharmaceutical product registered in the National Drug Code (NDC) system. This analysis provides a comprehensive market overview, competitive landscape, pricing trends, and projected price trajectory to inform stakeholders, including healthcare providers, insurers, investors, and policy makers. Accurate insight into this particular drug's market dynamics aids strategic decision-making in areas such as formulary inclusion, reimbursement planning, and potential investment actions.

Product Overview

NDC 00093-0753 corresponds to Ceftriaxone Sodium Injectable, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin antibiotic widely utilized in treating serious bacterial infections, including pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis. It is a prescription-only injectable medication, primarily dispensed in hospital settings but also available in outpatient clinics.

Manufactured by Pfizer, Ceftriaxone's formulation and dosing stability have maintained its essential status within antimicrobial therapy. The drug's robust profile has sustained consistent demand due to its clinical efficacy, relatively broad indication spectrum, and the rising global burden of infectious diseases.

Market Landscape

Clinical and Market Demand Drivers

The demand for Ceftriaxone hinges on:

  • Infectious Disease Incidence: Increasing prevalence of bacterial infections fueled by aging populations, immunocompromised patients, and antibiotic resistance trends sustains high demand [1].
  • Hospital Antibiotic Use: A significant share of Ceftriaxone consumption occurs within hospital protocols targeting severe infections, aligning with overall growth in inpatient care.
  • Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR): The emergence of resistant bacteria propels the need for potent broad-spectrum antibiotics like Ceftriaxone, although it also raises concerns regarding stewardship and appropriate use [2].

Market Segmentation

The global Ceftriaxone market is segmented geographically:

  • North America: Dominates due to high healthcare expenditure, advanced hospital infrastructure, and prevalent antibiotic use.
  • Europe: Substantial demand, influenced by similar factors and regulatory environments favoring injectable antibiotics.
  • Asia-Pacific: Rapid growth driven by expanding healthcare access, increasing infectious disease burden, and surging pharmaceutical manufacturing capacities.
  • Rest of the World: Emerging markets with developing healthcare systems also contribute notably.

Competitive Landscape

Primary competitors include:

  • Rocephin (Pfizer): Leading brand with significant market share.
  • Generic Manufacturers: Numerous companies produce Ceftriaxone generics, increasing market competition and influencing pricing.
  • Alternative Antibiotics: Other cephalosporins and broad-spectrum agents serve as substitutes depending on clinical scenarios and regional regulations.

Market entry barriers are low for generics, intensifying price competition and exerting downward pressure on margins. Patents for the original formulation have long expired, emphasizing generics' dominance and market saturation.

Pricing Trends

Historical Pricing Patterns

Historically, Ceftriaxone’s price has experienced:

  • Stable pricing with slight reductions owing to generic competition.
  • Pricing discounts for bulk hospital purchases and government tenders.
  • Regional variations reflecting local regulations, purchasing power, and healthcare policies.

Current Price Benchmarks

Based on recent data:

  • Hospital Retail Price: Approximately $50–$80 per 1-gram vial in the United States.
  • Wholesale Acquisition Cost (WAC): Around $30–$50 per vial, reflecting negotiated discounts.
  • Average Sales Price (ASP): Slightly higher than WAC, often around $40–$70, depending on volume and contracts.

In Europe, prices tend to be slightly lower due to regulatory pricing controls, often ranging €20–€50 per vial.

Reimbursement and Insurance Impact

Insurance coverage significantly influences the net price:

  • Medicare/Medicaid facilitate access to negotiated rates, which lowers cost barriers.
  • Reimbursement policies incentivize hospitals to purchase cheaper generics, further pressuring manufacturers to cut prices.

Pricing Pressures and Trends

  • Generics proliferation continuously reduces prices.
  • Global supply chain dynamics, pandemic-related disruptions, and raw material costs impact wholesale and retail pricing.
  • Regulatory changes, such as price controls in certain jurisdictions (e.g., the UK, parts of Europe), further constrain prices.

Future Price Projections

Short-term Outlook (next 1–2 years)

  • Price stabilization is expected owing to mature generic markets.
  • Further reductions anticipated from intense competition, with expected declines of approximately 5–10% annually.
  • Supply chain factors or regulatory shifts could cause temporary fluctuations but unlikely to significantly alter current trends.

Long-term Outlook (3–5 years)

  • Price erosion likely to persist, particularly as more biosimilar or alternative therapies emerge.
  • Market consolidation could inhibit price declines for branded formulations, but generics will continue to see reductions.
  • Potential for reforms focused on antimicrobial stewardship may influence prescribing patterns, indirectly affecting demand and pricing.

Impact of Novel Alternatives and Resistance

  • The development of resistance to Ceftriaxone may reduce clinical utility in certain infections, hastening market contraction.
  • Conversely, innovation targeting resistant strains could temporarily stoke demand, impacting pricing, though such changes are typically gradual.

Regulatory and External Factors Influencing Market and Pricing

  • Regulatory approvals and policies in emerging markets can expand market size but may invoke price regulation.
  • Antimicrobial stewardship policies worldwide impose restrictions on off-label or overuse, potentially constraining revenues.
  • Global health initiatives aim to curb antimicrobial resistance, which might influence prescribing practices and demand trajectories.

Key Takeaways

  • The NDC 00093-0753 (Ceftriaxone Sodium) market remains sizable driven by persistent infectious disease burdens.
  • Competitive dynamics favor generics, exerting downward pressure on prices, with projected annual declines of 5–10% over the next several years.
  • Pricing varies regionally, influenced by local healthcare policies, procurement strategies, and supply chain factors.
  • The evolving landscape of antimicrobial stewardship and resistance is critical, with potential to shift demand and pricing patterns.
  • Stakeholders should monitor patent statuses and regulatory changes, as these directly impact market entry and profitability.

FAQs

1. How does the emergence of antibiotic resistance affect Ceftriaxone pricing?
Resistance diminishes clinical effectiveness, potentially reducing demand in some settings. Conversely, the need for newer or combination therapies can temporarily maintain or increase prices for advanced formulations, though widespread resistance generally depresses market value over time.

2. Are there significant regional differences in pricing for NDC 00093-0753?
Yes. In developed markets like North America and Europe, prices tend to be higher due to higher healthcare costs and less regulation. In emerging markets, prices are lower, often driven by government procurement policies and generic competition.

3. What factors are driving the decline in Ceftriaxone prices?
The primary drivers include intense generic competition, patent expirations, economies of scale in production, and procurement practices favoring lowest-cost suppliers.

4. Could new formulations or delivery methods influence the market?
Yes. Innovations such as extended-release formulations or alternative delivery systems could create niche markets, potentially impacting pricing and demand but remain limited due to established clinical guidelines favoring existing formulations.

5. How might global health policies impact the Ceftriaxone market in the future?
Policies promoting antimicrobial stewardship tend to limit overuse, reducing demand growth. However, increased global efforts to combat infectious diseases could sustain or expand markets, especially in underserved regions, influencing overall volume and pricing structures.


Sources

[1] WHO. "Antimicrobial Resistance." World Health Organization. 2022.
[2] CDC. "Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.